Skip Navigation


AOBPreview originally published online on August 28, 2008
Annals of Botany 2008 102(5):835-843; doi:10.1093/aob/mcn161
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow ContentSelect
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
102/5/835    most recent
mcn161v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in Ann Bot
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gutjahr, S.
Right arrow Articles by Lapointe, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gutjahr, S.
Right arrow Articles by Lapointe, L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Gutjahr, S.
Right arrow Articles by Lapointe, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Carbon Dioxide Enrichment Does Not Reduce Leaf Longevity or Alter Accumulation of Carbon Reserves in the Woodland Spring Ephemeral Erythronium americanum

Sylvain Gutjahr and Line Lapointe*

Département de biologie et Centre d'étude de la forêt, Université Laval, Québec (Québec), Canada G1V 0A6

* For correspondence. E-mail Line.Lapointe{at}bio.ulaval.ca

Received: 29 May 2008    Returned for revision: 21 July 2008    Accepted: 29 July 2008    Published electronically: 29 August 2008

Background and Aims: Woodland spring ephemerals exhibit a relatively short epigeous growth period prior to canopy closure. However, it has been suggested that leaf senescence is induced by a reduction in the carbohydrate sink demand, rather than by changes in light availability. To ascertain whether a potentially higher net carbon (C) assimilation rate could shorten leaf lifespan due to an accelerated rate of storage, Erythronium americanum plants were grown under ambient (400 ppm) and elevated (1100 ppm) CO2 concentrations.

Methods: During this growth-chamber experiment, plant biomass, bulb starch concentration and cell size, leaf phenology, gas exchange rates and nutrient concentrations were monitored.

Key Results: Plants grown at 1100 ppm CO2 had greater net C assimilation rates than those grown at 400 ppm CO2. However, plant size, final bulb mass, bulb filling rate and timing of leaf senescence did not differ.

Conclusions Erythronium americanum: fixed more C under elevated than under ambient CO2 conditions, but produced plants of similar size. The similar bulb growth rates under both CO2 concentrations suggest that the bulb filling rate is dependant on bulb cell elongation rate, rather than on C availability. Elevated CO2 stimulated leaf and bulb respiratory rates; this might reduce feed-back inhibition of photosynthesis and avoid inducing premature leaf senescence.

Key words: Source–sink relations, assimilation rates, growth rates, CO2 enrichment, respiration, spring ephemeral, leaf senescence, bulbous plant, carbohydrate storage, Erythronium americanum


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Related articles in Ann Bot:

ContentSnapshots

Ann Bot 2008 102: NP. [Extract] [Full Text]  

John Bryant takes a closer look at some of this month's Original Articles
J. A. Bryant
Ann Bot 2008 102: NP. [Extract] [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
M. Lundmark, V. Hurry, and L. Lapointe
Low temperature maximizes growth of Crocus vernus (L.) Hill via changes in carbon partitioning and corm development
J. Exp. Bot., May 1, 2009; 60(7): 2203 - 2213.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.