Skip Navigation


AOBPreview originally published online on February 14, 2009
Annals of Botany 2009 103(9):1379-1383; doi:10.1093/aob/mcp030
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
103/9/1379    most recent
mcp030v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in Ann Bot
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Karron, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Mitchell, R. J.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Karron, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Mitchell, R. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Karron, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Mitchell, R. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

This article appears in the following Annals of Botany issue: Special Issue: Plant-Pollinator Interactions [View the issue table of contents]

Pollinator visitation patterns strongly influence among-flower variation in selfing rate

Jeffrey D. Karron1,{dagger},*, Karsten G. Holmquist2,{dagger}, Rebecca J. Flanagan1 and Randall J. Mitchell3

1 Department of Biological Sciences, PO Box 413, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI 53201, USA
2 USDA Agriculture Research Service, Vegetable Crops Research Unit, Department of Horticulture, University of Wisconsin-Madison, WI 53706, USA
3 Department of Biology, University of Akron, Akron, OH 44325, USA

* For correspondence: E-mail: karron{at}uwm.edu

Received: 28 October 2008    Returned for revision: 21 November 2008    Accepted: 5 January 2009    Published electronically: 14 February 2009

Background and Aims: Adjacent flowers on Mimulus ringens floral displays often vary markedly in selfing rate. We hypothesized that this fine-scale variation in mating system reflects the tendency of bumble-bee pollinators to probe several flowers consecutively on multiflower displays. When a pollinator approaches a display, the first flower probed is likely to receive substantial outcross pollen. However, since pollen carryover in this species is limited, receipt of self pollen should increase rapidly for later flowers. Here the first direct experimental test of this hypothesis is described.

Methods: In order to link floral visitation sequences with selfing rates of individual flowers, replicate linear arrays were established, each composed of plants with unique genetic markers. This facilitated unambiguous assignment of paternity to all sampled progeny. A single wild bumble-bee was permitted to forage on each linear array, recording the order of floral visits on each display. Once fruits had matured, 120 fruits were harvested (four flowers from each of five floral displays in each of six arrays). Twenty-five seedlings from each fruit were genotyped and paternity was unambiguously assigned to all 3000 genotyped progeny.

Key Results: The order of pollinator probes on Mimulus floral displays strongly and significantly influenced selfing rates of individual fruits. Mean selfing rates increased from 21 % for initial probes to 78 % for the fourth flower probed on each display.

Conclusions: Striking among-flower differences in selfing rate result from increased deposition of geitonogamous (among-flower, within-display) self pollen as bumble-bees probe consecutive flowers on each floral display. The resulting heterogeneity in the genetic composition of sibships may influence seedling competition and the expression of inbreeding depression.

Key words: Autogamy, bee, Bombus fervidus, floral display, geitonogamy, mating system, monkeyflower, Mimulus ringens, paternity analysis, pollen carryover, pollinator visitation sequence, self-fertilization


{dagger} These authors contributed equally to this work.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Related articles in Ann Bot:

ContentSnapshots

Ann Bot 2009 103: i. [Extract] [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
R. J. Mitchell, R. E. Irwin, R. J. Flanagan, and J. D. Karron
Ecology and evolution of plant-pollinator interactions
Ann. Bot., June 1, 2009; 103(9): 1355 - 1363.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.