Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (42)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Weiner, J.
Right arrow Articles by Fishman, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Weiner, J.
Right arrow Articles by Fishman, L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Weiner, J.
Right arrow Articles by Fishman, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Annals of Botany 73: 263-271, 1994
© 1994 Annals of Botany Company

Competition and Allometry in Kochia scoparia

Jacob Weiner and Lila Fishman

Department of Biology, Swarthmore College, Swarthmore, PA 19081-1397, USA

Comparisons between crowded and uncrowded Kochia scoparia individuals demonstrate pronounced effects of competition on plant allometry as well as on the distributions of different aspects of size. Non-destructive measurements of height and stem diameter and, for a subset of the populations, the number and length of leaves and branches, were taken at three times, and the plants were harvested after the third measurement. The sequential measurements afforded the opportunity to obtain information of the effects of competition on allometric growth trajectories of individuals, as well as on static inter-individual allometric relationships.

The distributions of most size measures appeared to be normal for the uncrowded population. Crowded populations developed a negatively-skewed height distribution and a high-inequality mass distribution, whereas the diameter distributions remained normal. Plants grown without neighbours showed simple allometric relationships between height, diameter and weight. For isolated plants, the 'static' allometric relationship between plants of different sizes and the allometric growth trajectory of individuals were similar. Crowded populations showed complex allometry; the static inter-individual relationships between height, diameter and weight were curvilinear (on log-log scale). There were large differences in the allometric growth slopes of uncrowded vs. crowded plants. Allometric relationships between stem diameter and plant mass, and between total length of leaves and total length of branches, did not seem to be altered by competition.

The data suggest that height was the most important aspect of size influencing future growth of individuals in the crowded population. Only plants above a certain height were able to continue to grow from the second to third measurement in the crowded population. This supports the hypothesis that asymmetric competition for light is the cause of the allometric changes and of the increase in size variability due to competition.Copyright 1994, 1999 Academic Press

Allometric growth, allometry, competition, growth, Kochia


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
K. J. Niklas, D. A. DeMason, and E. D. Cobb
Genetic effects on the biomass partitioning and growth of Pisum and Lycopersicon
Am. J. Botany, April 1, 2008; 95(4): 424 - 433.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
C. R. C. VEGA and V. O. SADRAS
Size-Dependent Growth and the Development Of Inequality in Maize, Sunflower and Soybean
Ann. Bot., June 1, 2003; 91(7): 795 - 805.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.