Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (23)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by CROOK, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by ENNOS, A. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by CROOK, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by ENNOS, A. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by CROOK, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by ENNOS, A. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Annals of Botany 77: 197-202, 1996
© 1996 Annals of Botany Company

Mechanical Differences Between Free-standing and Supported Wheat Plants, Triticum aestivum L.

M. J. CROOK+ and A. R. ENNOS

School of Biological Sciences, Stopford Building, University of Manchester,, Oxford Road,, Manchester, M13 9PT, U.K.

July 5, 1995 ; August 28, 1995

The effect of wind sway on the mechanical characteristics of the anchorage roots and the stem was investigated in mature winter wheat (Triticum aestivumL., cv. Hereward). Wheat plants were field-grown, either supported by a frame, which prevented wind sway, or unsupported (free-standing) and the morphology and mechanical properties of the stems and the anchorage, ‘coronal ’, roots were measured.

Wind sway had little influence on either the stem height or ear weight of the plants but did affect the mechanical properties of the stem. Stems of supported plants were weaker and more flexible than the stems of free-standing plants. There were also differences in the anchorage systems between the treatments: supported plants had just under half as many ‘coronal ’ anchorage roots as the free-standing plants. This reduced the anchorage strength of supported plants by a third.

These differences in mechanical structure meant that the free-standing plants were more resistant to stem buckling and more resistant to anchorage failure. However, considering the difference in the need for mechanical strength in plants from the two regimes, these differences were small. This suggests that wheat has inherent mechanical integrity and, as a monocotyledon with no secondary thickening, it differs little structurally between environments.

Triticum aestivumL.; thigmomorphogenesis; anchorage; safety factor; mechanical stimulation


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Tree PhysiolHome page
L. Martin, N. Leblanc-Fournier, W. Azri, C. Lenne, C. Henry, C. Coutand, and J.-L. Julien
Characterization and expression analysis under bending and other abiotic factors of PtaZFP2, a poplar gene encoding a Cys2/His2 zinc finger protein
Tree Physiol, January 1, 2009; 29(1): 125 - 136.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
S. Puijalon, J.-P. Lena, and G. Bornette
Interactive Effects of Nutrient and Mechanical Stresses on Plant Morphology
Ann. Bot., November 1, 2007; 100(6): 1297 - 1305.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
M. Oladokun and A. Ennos
Structural development and stability of rice Oryza sativa L. var. Nerica 1
J. Exp. Bot., September 1, 2006; 57(12): 3123 - 3130.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
S. Puijalon and G. Bornette
Phenotypic plasticity and mechanical stress: biomass partitioning and clonal growth of an aquatic plant species
Am. J. Botany, August 1, 2006; 93(8): 1090 - 1099.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
S. Puijalon, G. Bornette, and P. Sagnes
Adaptations to increasing hydraulic stress: morphology, hydrodynamics and fitness of two higher aquatic plant species
J. Exp. Bot., February 1, 2005; 56(412): 777 - 786.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
V. C. Smith and A. R. Ennos
The effects of air flow and stem flexure on the mechanical and hydraulic properties of the stems of sunflowers Helianthus annuus L.
J. Exp. Bot., February 1, 2003; 54(383): 845 - 849.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Cell PhysiolHome page
A. Uchida and K. T. Yamamoto
Effects of Mechanical Vibration on Seed Germination of Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh.
Plant Cell Physiol., June 15, 2002; 43(6): 647 - 651.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.