Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (19)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BELESKY, D. P.
Right arrow Articles by FEDDERS, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by BELESKY, D. P.
Right arrow Articles by FEDDERS, J. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by BELESKY, D. P.
Right arrow Articles by FEDDERS, J. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Annals of Botany 78: 499-505, 1996
© 1996 Annals of Botany Company

Does Endophyte Influence Regrowth of Tall Fescue?

D. P. BELESKY+ and J. M. FEDDERS

USDA-ARS, Appalachian Soil and Water Conservation Research Laboratory, P.O. Box 400, Beaver, West Virginia, 25813, USA

February 6, 1996 ; May 10, 1996

The influence of ecological and environmental factors on the response of the mutualistic symbionts Acremonium coenophialum (Morgan-Jones and Gams), and tall fescue ( Festuca arundinacea, Schreb.) has received substantial attention. However, much of what is known about developmental and physiological responses has been obtained from static or mature canopies and the influence of defoliation on the symbiota has not been considered in detail. A controlled environment experiment was conducted to assess the influence of defoliation and endophyte on the regrowth and development of two tall fescue genotypes and their respective endophytes, known to differ in morphology and alkaloid production capacity. The response of endophyte infected relative to non-infected plants was evaluated for measured and calculated parameters for each defoliation. While the influence of genotype was substantial on virtually all parameters, endophyte interacted with genotype and defoliation resulting in enhanced plasticity of mutualists as a response to varying conditions. Endophyte infection influenced leaf mass depending upon genotype, while the relative benefit of endophyte on pseudostem mass was affected by defoliation. Endophyte interacted with genotype to influence relative growth rate and productivity relative to nitrogen concentration when canopies were clipped, but was less important when canopies remained uncut. In some instances endophyte gave growth and size advantage to the host and did not in others. Generalities regarding symbiont response to extrinsic factors may be misleading, since responses depend upon the specific mutualism considered and conditions imposed.

Acremonium coenophialum ; Festuca arundinacea ; non-structural carbohydrate; relative growth rate


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
S. Rasmussen, A. J. Parsons, K. Fraser, H. Xue, and J. A. Newman
Metabolic Profiles of Lolium perenne Are Differentially Affected by Nitrogen Supply, Carbohydrate Content, and Fungal Endophyte Infection
Plant Physiology, March 1, 2008; 146(3): 1440 - 1453.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
M. J. SPIERING, D. H. GREER, and J. SCHMID
Effects of the Fungal Endophyte, Neotyphodium lolii, on Net Photosynthesis and Growth Rates of Perennial Ryegrass (Lolium perenne) are Independent of In Planta Endophyte Concentration
Ann. Bot., August 1, 2006; 98(2): 379 - 387.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.