Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by NIKLAS, K. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by NIKLAS, K. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by NIKLAS, K. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Annals of Botany 81: 23-34, 1998
© 1998 Annals of Botany Company

The Mechanical Roles of Clasping Leaf Sheaths: Evidence fromArundinaria técta(Poaceae) Shoots Subjected to Bending and Twisting Forces

KARL J. NIKLAS+,

Section of Plant Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, 14853, USA

April 23, 1997 ; July 25, 1997 .

Representative shoot segments of the grass speciesArundinaria téctaconsisting of one intact internode and its subtending node and clasping leaf sheath were tested to determine the mechanical influence of the leaf sheath on the ability of stems to resist bending and twisting forces. These segments were also used to measure shoot morphometry and composite tissue Young's and shear moduli (EandG,respectively) to simulate the global deformation patterns attending bending and twisting by means of finite element analyses. On average, leaf sheaths contributed 33% of the overall bending stiffness and 43% of the overall torsional stiffness of stem segments. Comparisons betweenEandGof isolated internodes and leaf sheaths indicated that sheaths were composed of stiffer tissues measured either in bending or twisting. Thus, leaf sheaths could act as an external cylindrical brace composed of stiffer materials than those of the internodes they enveloped. The magnitudes of internodalEandGwere correlated with internodal shape such that the ability of internodes to resist twisting relative to the ability to resist bending forces decreased as internodes became more slender or developed thinner walls (both of which occur in an acropetal direction from the base to the tip of shoots). Finite element simulations predicted that, in bending, the leaf sheath laterally braces internodal walls as they tend to ovalize in cross section and push against its inner surface which ovalizes to a lesser extent in the plane normal to the curvature of shoot flexure. In twisting, the successive ovalized transections of internodal walls assumed a helical pattern along the length of shoot segments. This helical deformation pattern was attended by an inner lateral contraction of internodal walls that was less developed in the leaf sheath that thus provided decreasing mechanical support to the internode as the lateral contraction of internodal walls amplified. The twisting of internodes and sheaths was also predicted to concentrate tensile and shear strains in the nodal diaphragm. Here stress intensities sufficient to produce tissue shear failure were concentrated at two opposing points on the surface of the diaphragm. Finite element analyses thus identified a potential weak point in the mechanical construction of hollow, septate shoots that are, nevertheless, more than adequately stiff to support their own weight, yet sufficiently flexible to twist without irreparable damage in normal winds.Copyright 1998 Annals of Botany Company

Plant stems; nodes; internodes; leaf sheaths; elastic moduli; wind lodging; biomechanics.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biol. Bull.Home page
S. A. Etnier
Twisting and Bending of Biological Beams: Distribution of Biological Beams in a Stiffness Mechanospace
Biol. Bull., August 1, 2003; 205(1): 36 - 46.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.