Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bennett, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Hanson, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bennett, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Hanson, L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Bennett, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Hanson, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Annals of Botany 82 (Supplement A): 121-134, 1998
© 1998 Annals of Botany Company

DNA Amounts in Two Samples of Angiosperm Weeds

Michael D. Bennett 1, Ilia J. Leitch 1, and Lynda Hanson 1

1 Jodrell Laboratory, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 3DS, UK

Fax 0181 332 5310, m.bennett{at}rbgkew.org.uk

Of the world's 250000 angiosperm species, only about 200 are recognized as important weeds. 4C nuclear DNA amounts were estimated for 39 such species. Success for many important weeds is suggested to reflect several traits known to correlate with low DNA C-value, so such weeds may have smaller DNA C-values than other species. Our work tests this hypothesis, comparing DNA amounts in 156 species recognized as important world weeds or British garden weeds, with 2685 other species. DNA amounts did not differ significantly between the two weed samples, but weeds showed highly significant differences from other species. For example, nuclear DNA amount in weeds (mean 11·74 pg) was smaller than in other species (mean 28·13 pg), and restricted to the lowest 20% of their range. Similarly, DNA amount per genome in weeds (mean 3·79 pg) was smaller than in other species (mean 12·14 pg), and restricted to the lowest 10% of their range. As significant differences between weeds and other species remain for almost all sub-samples tested, this contrast is widely distributed. So it is important to ask how selection against high nuclear DNA amount and genome size in weeds operates. The probability of a species being a weed fell significantly with increasing nuclear 4C DNA amount, and mean genome size, reaching zero just above 100 pg, and 19 pg, respectively. Moreover, polyploidy was significantly more frequent in weeds (51%) than in other species (27%), increasing with nuclear DNA amount in both, reaching 100% in weeds with the highest 4C DNA amounts, but only 41% in other species. Thus, selection for polyploidy in weeds may partly reflect their increased genetic variability, independent of DNA amount. However, such selection pressure grows strongly with rising nuclear DNA amount, and this may act mainly on correlated factors including faster development.

Angiosperm DNA amounts, DNA C-values, genome size, important world weeds, British garden weeds, polyploidy

Submitted on August 3, 1998
Revised on September 15, 1998
Accepted on September 21, 1998


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
S. Lavergne, N. J. Muenke, and J. Molofsky
Genome size reduction can trigger rapid phenotypic evolution in invasive plants
Ann. Bot., November 3, 2009; (2009) mcp271v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
J. Chrtek Jr, J. Zahradnicek, K. Krak, and J. Fehrer
Genome size in Hieracium subgenus Hieracium (Asteraceae) is strongly correlated with major phylogenetic groups
Ann. Bot., July 1, 2009; 104(1): 161 - 178.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
J. Greilhuber
Cytochemistry and C-values: The Less-well-known World of Nuclear DNA Amounts
Ann. Bot., April 1, 2008; 101(6): 791 - 804.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
C. A. Knight and J. M. Beaulieu
Genome Size Scaling through Phenotype Space
Ann. Bot., April 1, 2008; 101(6): 759 - 766.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
I. J. Leitch and M. F. Fay
Plant Genome Horizons: Michael Bennett's Contribution to Genome Research
Ann. Bot., April 1, 2008; 101(6): 737 - 746.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
T. GARNATJE, S.ÒN. GARCIA, R. VILATERSANA, and J. VALLES
Genome Size Variation in the Genus Carthamus (Asteraceae, Cardueae): Systematic Implications and Additive Changes During Allopolyploidization
Ann. Bot., March 1, 2006; 97(3): 461 - 467.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
H. Weiss-Schneeweiss, J. Greilhuber, and G. M. Schneeweiss
Genome size evolution in holoparasitic Orobanche (Orobanchaceae) and related genera
Am. J. Botany, December 1, 2005; 93(1): 148 - 156.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
M. D. BENNETT and I. J. LEITCH
Nuclear DNA Amounts in Angiosperms: Progress, Problems and Prospects
Ann. Bot., January 1, 2005; 95(1): 45 - 90.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
J. GREILHUBER
Intraspecific Variation in Genome Size in Angiosperms: Identifying its Existence
Ann. Bot., January 1, 2005; 95(1): 91 - 98.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
T. R. GREGORY
The C-value Enigma in Plants and Animals: A Review of Parallels and an Appeal for Partnership
Ann. Bot., January 1, 2005; 95(1): 133 - 146.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
T. CAVALIER-SMITH
Economy, Speed and Size Matter: Evolutionary Forces Driving Nuclear Genome Miniaturization and Expansion
Ann. Bot., January 1, 2005; 95(1): 147 - 175.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
C. A. KNIGHT, N. A. MOLINARI, and D. A. PETROV
The Large Genome Constraint Hypothesis: Evolution, Ecology and Phenotype
Ann. Bot., January 1, 2005; 95(1): 177 - 190.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
M. F. FAY, R. S. COWAN, and I. J. LEITCH
The Effects of Nuclear DNA Content (C-value) on the Quality and Utility of AFLP Fingerprints
Ann. Bot., January 1, 2005; 95(1): 237 - 246.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
J. GREILHUBER, J. DOLEZEL, M. A. LYSAK, and M. D. BENNETT
The Origin, Evolution and Proposed Stabilization of the Terms 'Genome Size' and 'C-Value' to Describe Nuclear DNA Contents
Ann. Bot., January 1, 2005; 95(1): 255 - 260.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
D. C. ALBACH and J. GREILHUBER
Genome Size Variation and Evolution in Veronica
Ann. Bot., December 1, 2004; 94(6): 897 - 911.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
S. S. Jakob, A. Meister, and F. R. Blattner
The Considerable Genome Size Variation of Hordeum Species (Poaceae) Is Linked to Phylogeny, Life Form, Ecology, and Speciation Rates
Mol. Biol. Evol., May 1, 2004; 21(5): 860 - 869.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
D. E. Soltis, P. S. Soltis, M. D. Bennett, and I. J. Leitch
Evolution of genome size in the angiosperms
Am. J. Botany, November 1, 2003; 90(11): 1596 - 1603.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
A. E. Hall, A. Fiebig, and D. Preuss
Beyond the Arabidopsis Genome: Opportunities for Comparative Genomics
Plant Physiology, August 1, 2002; 129(4): 1439 - 1447.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
U. Johanson, M. Karlsson, I. Johansson, S. Gustavsson, S. Sjovall, L. Fraysse, A. R. Weig, and P. Kjellbom
The Complete Set of Genes Encoding Major Intrinsic Proteins in Arabidopsis Provides a Framework for a New Nomenclature for Major Intrinsic Proteins in Plants
Plant Physiology, August 1, 2001; 126(4): 1358 - 1369.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant CellHome page
J. S. Heslop-Harrison
Comparative Genome Organization in Plants: From Sequence and Markers to Chromatin and Chromosomes
PLANT CELL, May 1, 2000; 12(5): 617 - 636.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.