Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Birnie, R. V.
Right arrow Articles by MacDonald, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Birnie, R. V.
Right arrow Articles by MacDonald, A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Birnie, R. V.
Right arrow Articles by MacDonald, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Annals of Botany 85 (Supplement B): 53-62, 2000
© 2000 Annals of Botany Company

The Potential Distribution and Impact of Bracken in Upland Scotland: An Assessment using a GIS-based Niche Model

Richard V. Birnie 1, David R. Miller 1, Paula L. Horne 1, Susan Leadbeater 1, and Angus MacDonald 2

1 Macaulay Land Use Research Institute, Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen AB15 8QH, UK
2 Scottish Natural Heritage, 2 Anderson Place, Edinburgh EH6 5NP, UK

Fax +44(0)1224 311556, r.birnie{at}mluri.sari.ac.uk

Bracken spread could have very selective impacts on the vegetation of upland Scotland (UK). Information on this would be of value in targeting appropriate management measures. However, it is difficult to establish accurately the current distribution of bracken, so modelling bracken spread using process-based models is not possible at present. An alternative modelling approach is described which uses knowledge of the climatic, soil and topographic limits to the existing bracken distribution in upland Scotland. This knowledge is formalized as a rule-based model. This is applied through a geographical information system (GIS) to identify the maximum potential bracken niche over the whole of Scotland with a nominal spatial resolution of 1 ha. The model is validated against field data from 14 sites around Scotland. Between 64–97% of the existing bracken lies within the predicted bracken niche. Locally low accuracies are ascribed to scale-effects derived from the input datasets, the nature of the ground data, as well as the universality of the model rules. The bracken niche is differentiated into two types: continuous and discontinuous. The total area of the niche is 6036 km2 or 7·75% of the land area of Scotland with a broad 60:40 split between the continuous and discontinuous niche types, respectively. However, there is a strong regional bias in their distribution with the discontinuous niche type principally occurring in the west of Scotland. Overlaying the potential niche on the Land Cover of Scotland 1988 dataset shows that it impacts on 70% of the national area of ‘good rough grassland’ and 31% of the ‘poor rough grassland’ category. In addition, 16% of the national area of ‘heather moorland’ is impacted. There are strong regional variations in these impacts which may have implications for future bracken management. The limitations of the approach are discussed and the potential for linking it to dynamic models is identified.

Bracken, uplands, Scotland, ecological modelling, spatial modelling, GIS, impact assessment

Submitted on August 2, 1999
Revised on October 15, 1999
Accepted on January 16, 2000


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Progress in Physical GeographyHome page
L. Chapman and J. E. Thornes
The use of geographical information systems in climatology and meteorology
Progress in Physical Geography, September 1, 2003; 27(3): 313 - 330.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.