Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Park, S. E.
Right arrow Articles by Watkinson, A. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Park, S. E.
Right arrow Articles by Watkinson, A. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Park, S. E.
Right arrow Articles by Watkinson, A. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Annals of Botany 87: 523-536, 2001
© 2001 Annals of Botany Company

Predicting the Growth Interactions between Plants in Mixed Species Stands using a Simple Mechanistic Model

S. E. Park, L. R. Benjamin+, D. P. Aikman and A. R. Watkinson

Schools of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK HorticultureResearch International, Wellesbourne, Warwick, Warks., CV35 9EF, UK Arden Hill Cottage, Hooknell, Norton Lindsey, Warks., UK

Received: 23 October 2000 ; Returned for revision: 30 November 2000 . Accepted: 8 January 2001

The Conductance model is a simple mechanistic model used to predict the growth of species in monoculture or mixtures from parameter values derived from plants grown in isolation. In contrast to many mechanistic models that require extensive parameterization, the Conductance model is able to capture the growth of a broad range of species using a few simplified assumptions regarding plant growth and easily derived species-specific parameter values. We examine the assumptions within the Conductance model that total leaf area per plant is proportional to total plant weight, and that an isolated plant has a projected crown zone area that is proportional to the 2/3 power of its weight. Power rather than linear relations were found between weight and leaf area for Brassica oleracea, Daucus carota, Matricaria inodora, Solanum nigrum,Stellaria media , Trifolium repens and Veronica persica. For all seven species, the value of the power was less than unity. All species also exhibited a power relation between crown zone area and weight, with the slope of this relation being less than 2/3 for B. oleracea, D. carota and S. media. Although morphology type accounted for some of the variation in the parameter values relating to light interception, there were considerable differences between species within upright or prostrate foliage species groups. The Conductance model was used to predict yields of B. oleracea, S. nigrum and V. persica grown in both monoculture and binary weed-crop mixtures over a range of temporal and spatial scales. After calibrating the model to non-competing plants, the model was used to predict growth of the weed and crop species in contrasting densities and stand types. In some crop-weed combinations, predicted crop and weed weights were within 17% of observed values, with no systematic deviations. In others, systematic and large deviations occurred.Copyright 2001 Annals of Botany Company

Brassica oleracea L., Daucus carota L., Matricaria inodora L., Solanum nigrum L.,Stellaria media L., Trifolium repens L., Veronica persica L., competition, growth, leaf area, crown zone area, light, shoot morphology, canopy architecture


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
S. E. PARK, L. R. BENJAMIN, and A. R. WATKINSON
The Theory and Application of Plant Competition Models: an Agronomic Perspective
Ann. Bot., December 1, 2003; 92(6): 741 - 748.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.