Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Content Snapshot
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (18)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by PUNTIERI, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by BARTHÉLÉMY, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by PUNTIERI, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by BARTHÉLÉMY, D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by PUNTIERI, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by BARTHÉLÉMY, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Annals of Botany 89: 665-673, 2002
© 2002 Annals of Botany Company

Preformation and Neoformation in Shoots of Nothofagus antarctica (G. Forster) Oerst. (Nothofagaceae) Shrubs from Northern Patagonia

J. G. PUNTIERI1,2, M. STECCONI*,1,2 and D. BARTHÉLÉMY3

1Departamento de Botánica, Centro Regional Universitario Bariloche, Universidad Nacional del Comahue, Quintral 1250, 8400 Bariloche, Argentina, 2Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Av. Rivadavia 1917, 1033 Buenos Aires, Argentina and 3Unité Mixte CIRAD–CNRS–EPHE–INRA–Université Montpellier 2 (AMAP), TA40/PS2, Boulevard de la Lironde, 34398 Montpellier Cedex 5, France

* For correspondence. E-mail stecconi{at}crub.uncoma.edu.ar

Received: 30 August 2001; Returned for revision: 30 November 2001; Accepted: 8 February 2002.

The size (length and diameter) and number of leaf primordia of winter buds of Nothofagus antarctica (G. Forster) Oerst. shrubs were compared with the size and number of leaves of shoots derived from buds in equivalent positions. Buds developed in two successive years were compared in terms of size and number of leaf primordia. Bud size and the number of leaf primordia per bud were greater for distal than for proximally positioned buds. Shoots that developed in the five positions closest to the distal end of their parent shoots had significantly more leaves than more proximally positioned shoots of the same parent shoots. The positive relationship between the size of a shoot and that of its parent shoot was stronger for proximal than for distal positions on the parent shoots. For each bud position on the parent shoots there were differences in the number of leaf primordia per bud between consecutive years. The correlations between the number of leaf primordia per bud and bud size, bud position and parent shoot size varied between years. Only shoots produced close to the distal end of a parent shoot developed neoformed leaves; more proximal sibling shoots consisted entirely of preformed leaves. Leaf neoformation, a process usually linked with high shoot vigour in woody plants, seems to be widespread among the relatively small shoots developed in N. antarctica shrubs, which may relate to the species’ opportunistic response to disturbance.

Key words: Bud structure, preformation, shoot growth, neoformation, branching, leaf primordia, Nothofagus antarctica, ñire.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
J. G. Puntieri, J. E. Grosfeld, and P. Heuret
Preformation and distribution of staminate and pistillate flowers in growth units of Nothofagus alpina and N. obliqua (Nothofagaceae)
Ann. Bot., February 1, 2009; 103(3): 411 - 421.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
T. M. Foster, A. N. Seleznyova, and A. M. Barnett
Independent Control of Organogenesis and Shoot Tip Abortion are Key Factors to Developmental Plasticity in Kiwifruit (Actinidia)
Ann. Bot., September 1, 2007; 100(3): 471 - 481.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
P.-E. Lauri
Differentiation and growth traits associated with acrotony in the apple tree (Malus xdomestica, Rosaceae)
Am. J. Botany, August 1, 2007; 94(8): 1273 - 1281.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
J. G. Puntieri, J. E. Grosfeld, M. Stecconi, C. Brion, and D. Barthelemy
Bud and growth-unit structure in seedlings and saplings of Nothofagus alpina (Nothofagaceae)
Am. J. Botany, August 1, 2007; 94(8): 1382 - 1390.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
D. Barthelemy and Y. Caraglio
Plant Architecture: A Dynamic, Multilevel and Comprehensive Approach to Plant Form, Structure and Ontogeny
Ann. Bot., March 1, 2007; 99(3): 375 - 407.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
Y. GUEDON, J. G. PUNTIERI, S. SABATIER, and D. BARTHELEMY
Relative Extents of Preformation and Neoformation in Tree Shoots: Analysis by a Deconvolution Method
Ann. Bot., October 1, 2006; 98(4): 835 - 844.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
S. PALACIO and G. MONTSERRAT-MARTI
Bud Morphology and Shoot Growth Dynamics in Two Species of Mediterranean Sub-shrubs Co-Existing in Gypsum Outcrops
Ann. Bot., May 1, 2005; 95(6): 949 - 958.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
E. COSTES
Winter Bud Content According to Position in 3-year-old Branching Systems of 'Granny Smith' Apple
Ann. Bot., October 1, 2003; 92(4): 581 - 588.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
S. SABATIER, D. BARTHELEMY, and I. DUCOUSSO
Periods of Organogenesis in Mono- and Bicyclic Annual Shoots of Juglans regia L. (Juglandaceae)
Ann. Bot., August 1, 2003; 92(2): 231 - 238.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.