Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Content Snapshot
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by WONG, C.
Right arrow Articles by GAN, Y. Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by WONG, C.
Right arrow Articles by GAN, Y. Y.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by WONG, C.
Right arrow Articles by GAN, Y. Y.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Annals of Botany 90: 231-238, 2002
© 2002 Annals of Botany Company

Assessment of the Validity of the Sections in Musa (Musaceae) using AFLP

CAROL WONG1, RUTH KIEW2, GEORGE ARGENT3, OHN SET2, SING KONG LEE1 and YIK YUEN GAN*,1

1 Natural Sciences Academic Group, National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, 1 Nanyang Walk, 637616 Singapore, 2 Singapore Botanic Gardens, 1 Cluny Road, 259569 Singapore, 3 Royal Botanic Garden, Edinburgh EH3 5LR, UK

* For correspondence. Fax +65 8969445, e-mail yygan{at}nie.edu.sg

Received: 15 November 2001; Returned for revision: 7 January 2002; Accepted: 22 April 2002

Musa L. (Musaceae) is currently separated into five sections (Musa, Rhodochlamys, Callimusa, Australimusa and Ingentimusa) based on chromosome numbers and morphological characters. However, the validation of this classification system is questioned due to the common occurrence of hybridizations across sections and the system not accommodating anomalous species. This study employed amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) in a phenetic examination of the relationships among four sections (material of sect. Ingentimusa was not available) to evaluate whether their genetic differences justify distinction into separate groups. Using eight primer combinations, a total of 276 bands was scored, of which 275 were polymorphic. Among the monomorphic bands, 11 unique markers were identified that revealed the distinct separation of the 11-chromosome species from the 10-chromosome species. AFLP results suggest that species of sect. Rhodochlamys should be combined into a single section with species of sect. Musa, and likewise for species of sect. Australimusa to be merged with those of sect. Callimusa.

Key words: Banana, Musa, Musaceae, section, Rhodochlamys, Callimusa, Australimusa, AFLP, DNA fingerprinting.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
J. S. Heslop-Harrison and T. Schwarzacher
Domestication, Genomics and the Future for Banana
Ann. Bot., October 1, 2007; 100(5): 1073 - 1084.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.