Skip Navigation


AOBPreview originally published online on August 5, 2002
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Content Snapshot
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
90/3/315    most recent
mcf190v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by FAN, X. H.
Right arrow Articles by RENGEL, Z.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by FAN, X. H.
Right arrow Articles by RENGEL, Z.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by FAN, X. H.
Right arrow Articles by RENGEL, Z.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Annals of Botany 90: 315-323, 2002
© 2002 Annals of Botany Company

Nitrate Uptake, Nitrate Reductase Distribution and their Relation to Proton Release in Five Nodulated Grain Legumes

X. H. FAN1,2, C. TANG*,1 and Z. RENGEL1

1 Department of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia and 2 Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, P. R. China

* For correspondence. Fax +61 8 8380 1050, e-mail cxtang{at}cyllene.uwa.edu.au

Received: 28 February 2002; Returned for revision: 25 April 2002; Accepted: 27 May 2002    Published electronically: 5 August 2002

Nitrate uptake, nitrate reductase activity (NRA) and net proton release were compared in five grain legumes grown at 0·2 and 2 mM nitrate in nutrient solution. Nitrate treatments, imposed on 22-d-old, fully nodulated plants, lasted for 21 d. Increasing nitrate supply did not significantly influence the growth of any of the species during the treatment, but yellow lupin (Lupinus luteus) had a higher growth rate than the other species examined. At 0·2 mM nitrate supply, nitrate uptake rates ranged from 0·6 to 1·5 mg N g–1 d–1 in the order: yellow lupin > field pea (Pisum sativum) > chickpea (Cicer arietinum) > narrow-leafed lupin (L. angustifolius) > white lupin (L. albus). At 2 mM nitrate supply, nitrate uptake ranged from 1·7 to 8·2 mg N g–1 d–1 in the order: field pea > chickpea > white lupin > yellow lupin > narrow-leafed lupin. Nitrate reductase activity increased with increased nitrate supply, with the majority of NRA being present in shoots. Field pea and chickpea had much higher shoot NRA than the three lupin species. When 0·2 mM nitrate was supplied, narrow-leafed lupin released the most H+ per unit root biomass per day, followed by yellow lupin, white lupin, field pea and chickpea. At 2 mM nitrate, narrow-leafed lupin and yellow lupin showed net proton release, whereas the other species, especially field pea, showed net OH release. Irrespective of legume species and nitrate supply, proton release was negatively correlated with nitrate uptake and NRA in shoots, but not with NRA in roots.

Key words: Distribution, nitrate uptake, nitrate reductase, N2 fixation, proton release, species variation.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
J. Niu, F. Chen, G. Mi, C. Li, and F. Zhang
Transpiration, and Nitrogen Uptake and Flow in Two Maize (Zea mays L.) Inbred Lines as Affected by Nitrogen Supply
Ann. Bot., January 1, 2007; 99(1): 153 - 160.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.