Skip Navigation


AOBPreview originally published online on April 15, 2003
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Content Snapshot
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
91/7/905    most recent
mcg097v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by ISHIZAKI, S.
Right arrow Articles by HIROSE, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by ISHIZAKI, S.
Right arrow Articles by HIROSE, T.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by ISHIZAKI, S.
Right arrow Articles by HIROSE, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Annals of Botany 91: 905-914, 2003
© 2003 Annals of Botany Company

Increase in Leaf Mass Per Area Benefits Plant Growth at Elevated CO2 Concentration

SHINJIRO ISHIZAKI1, KOUKI HIKOSAKA1 and TADAKI HIROSE1

1 Graduate School of Life Sciences, Tohoku University, Aoba, Sendai 980-8578, Japan

* For correspondence. Fax +81 22 217 6699, e-mail hirose{at}mail.cc.tohoku.ac.jp

Received: 23 October 2002; Returned for revision: 17 December 2002; Accepted: 28 February 2003    Published electronically: 15 April 2003

An increase in leaf mass per area (MLA) of plants grown at elevated [CO2] is often accompanied by accumulation of non-structural carbohydrates, and has been considered to be a response resulting from source–sink imbalance. We hypothesized that the increase in MLA benefits plants by increasing the net assimilation rate through maintaining a high leaf nitrogen content per area (NLA). To test this hypothesis, Polygonum cuspidatum was grown at ambient (370 µmol mol–1) and elevated (700 µmol mol–1) [CO2] with three levels of N supply. Elevated [CO2] significantly increased MLA with smaller effects on NLA and leaf mass ratio (fLM). The effect of change in MLA on plant growth was investigated by the sensitivity analysis: MLA values observed at ambient and elevated [CO2] were substituted into a steady-state growth model to calculate the relative growth rate (R). At ambient [CO2], substitution of a high MLA (observed at elevated [CO2]) did not increase R, compared with R for a low MLA (observed at ambient [CO2]), whereas at elevated [CO2] the high MLA always increased R compared with R at the low MLA. These results suggest that the increase in MLA contributes to growth enhancement under elevated [CO2]. The optimal combination of fLM and MLA to maximize R was determined for different [CO2] and N availabilities. The optimal fLM was nearly constant, while the optimal MLA increased at elevated [CO2], and decreased at higher N availabilities. The changes in fLM of actual plants may compensate for the limited plasticity of MLA.

Key words: Elevated [CO2], growth model, leaf mass per area, leaf mass ratio, leaf nitrogen, optimal allocation, root: shoot ratio, sensitivity analysis.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
Y. OSONE and M. TATENO
Applicability and Limitations of Optimal Biomass Allocation Models: A Test of Two Species from Fertile and Infertile Habitats
Ann. Bot., June 1, 2005; 95(7): 1211 - 1220.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
Y. Onoda, K. Hikosaka, and T. Hirose
Seasonal change in the balance between capacities of RuBP carboxylation and RuBP regeneration affects CO2 response of photosynthesis in Polygonum cuspidatum
J. Exp. Bot., February 1, 2005; 56(412): 755 - 763.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.