Skip Navigation


AOBPreview originally published online on September 10, 2003
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Content Snapshot
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
92/5/679    most recent
mcg188v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LÖTSCHER, M.
Right arrow Articles by SCHNYDER, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by LÖTSCHER, M.
Right arrow Articles by SCHNYDER, H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by LÖTSCHER, M.
Right arrow Articles by SCHNYDER, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Annals of Botany 92: 679-688, 2003
© 2003 Annals of Botany Company

Vertical Leaf Nitrogen Distribution in Relation to Nitrogen Status in Grassland Plants

MARKUS LÖTSCHER*,1, KATHARINA STROH1 and HANS SCHNYDER1

1 Lehrstuhl für Grünlandlehre, Technische Universität München, D-85350 Freising, Germany

* For correspondence. E-mail loetscher{at}wzw.tum.de

Received: 2 July 2003;; Returned for revision: 11 July 2003. Accepted: 28 July 2003; Published electronically: 10 September 2003

Vertical gradients of leaf nitrogen (N) per unit leaf area (NLA) are viewed as plastic responses that optimize N utilization with respect to carbon assimilation. However, it has been shown that plant species, sowing density and N availability affect the steepness of the NLA gradient relative to the photon flux density (PFD) gradient. This paper tests the hypothesis that such variation is related to the N status of the plant. The N status was analysed using the concept of the critical N concentration (Ncrit) in which shoot N per unit dry mass (NSM) decreases with shoot mass, and a negative deviation of actual NSM from Ncrit indicates N shortage in the plant. The hypothesis was tested with contrasting grassland species Medicago sativa, Dactylis glomerata and Taraxacum officinale by varying PFD and N availability, plant density and hierarchical positions of individuals within stands. Combinations of all treatments showed a general negative correlation between the N allocation coefficient (i.e. the slope of the NLA–PFD relationship) and NSM for all three species. Thus, NLA, relative to PFD, gradients became steeper with increasing shoot mass and increasing N shortage in the plant. These data are consistent with the view that internal N availability is an important factor in modifying the NLA gradient.

Key words: Dactylis glomerata, grassland species, light profile, leaf nitrogen distribution, Medicago sativa, plant nitrogen status, size hierarchy, Taraxacum officinale.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
J. Bertheloot, P. Martre, and B. Andrieu
Dynamics of Light and Nitrogen Distribution during Grain Filling within Wheat Canopy
Plant Physiology, November 1, 2008; 148(3): 1707 - 1720.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
T. L. PONS and Y. E. M. de JONG-VAN BERKEL
Species-specific Variation in the Importance of the Spectral Quality Gradient in Canopies as a Signal for Photosynthetic Resource Partitioning
Ann. Bot., November 1, 2004; 94(5): 725 - 732.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.