Skip Navigation


AOBPreview originally published online on October 17, 2003
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Content Snapshot
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
92/6/795    most recent
mcg203v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (16)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by ÅGREN, G. I.
Right arrow Articles by FRANKLIN, O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by ÅGREN, G. I.
Right arrow Articles by FRANKLIN, O.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by ÅGREN, G. I.
Right arrow Articles by FRANKLIN, O.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Annals of Botany 92: 795-800, 2003
© 2003 Annals of Botany Company

Root : Shoot Ratios, Optimization and Nitrogen Productivity

GÖRAN I. ÅGREN*,1 and OSKAR FRANKLIN1

1 Department of Ecology and Environmental Research, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, PO Box 7072, SE-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden

* For correspondence. E-mail Goran.Agren{at}eom.slu.se

Received: 25 April 2003; Returned for revision: 21 July 2003; Accepted: 3 September 2003    Published electronically: 17 October 2003

Plants respond to nitrogen availability by changing their root : shoot ratios. One hypothesis used to explain this allocation is that plants optimize their behaviour by maximizing their relative growth rate. The consequences of this hypothesis were investigated by formulating two models for root : shoot allocation, with and without explicit inclusion of maintenance respiration. The models also took into account that relative growth rate is a linear function of plant nitrogen concentration. The model without respiration gave qualitatively reasonable results when predictions were compared with observed results from growth experiments with birch and tomato. The explicit inclusion of maintenance respiration improved considerably the agreement between prediction and observation, and for birch was within the experimental accuracy. Further improvements will require additional details in the description of respiratory processes and the nitrogen uptake function. Plants growing under extreme nutrient stress may also optimize their behaviour with respect to other variables in addition to relative growth rate.

Key words: Birch, Betula pendula, tomato, Lycopersicon esculentum, respiration, nitrogen.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J. A. Langley, K. L. McKee, D. R. Cahoon, J. A. Cherry, and J. P. Megonigal
Elevated CO2 stimulates marsh elevation gain, counterbalancing sea-level rise
PNAS, April 14, 2009; 106(15): 6182 - 6186.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
D. J. Greenwood, J. M. T. Mckee, D. P. Fuller, I. G. Burns, and B. J. Mulholland
A Novel Method of Supplying Nutrients Permits Predictable Shoot Growth and Root : Shoot Ratios of Pre-transplant Bedding Plants
Ann. Bot., January 1, 2007; 99(1): 171 - 182.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
M. ANDREWS, J. A. RAVEN, P. J. LEA, and J. I. SPRENT
A Role for Shoot Protein in Shoot-Root Dry Matter Allocation in Higher Plants
Ann. Bot., January 1, 2006; 97(1): 3 - 10.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
Y. OSONE and M. TATENO
Applicability and Limitations of Optimal Biomass Allocation Models: A Test of Two Species from Fertile and Infertile Habitats
Ann. Bot., June 1, 2005; 95(7): 1211 - 1220.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.