Skip Navigation


AOBPreview originally published online on October 28, 2004
Annals of Botany 2004 94(6):865-874; doi:10.1093/aob/mch214
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
94/6/865    most recent
mch214v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by GALLEGO, L.
Right arrow Articles by DISTEL, R. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by GALLEGO, L.
Right arrow Articles by DISTEL, R. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by GALLEGO, L.
Right arrow Articles by DISTEL, R. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


Annals of Botany 94/6, © Annals of Botany Company 2004; all rights reserved

Phytolith Assemblages in Grasses Native to Central Argentina

LUCRECIA GALLEGO and ROBERTO A. DISTEL*

Departamento de Agronomía, Universidad Nacional del Sur and CERZOS, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas de la República Argentina, San Andrés 800, 8000 – Bahía Blanca, Argentina

* For correspondence. E-mail cedistel{at}criba.edu.ar

Received: 16 April 2004    Returned for revision: 11 June 2004    Accepted: 24 August 2004    Published electronically: 28 October 2004

Background and Aims Phytolith reference collections are a prerequisite for accurate interpretation of soil phytolith assemblages aimed at reconstructing past vegetation. In this study a phytolith reference collection has been developed for several grasses native to central Argentina: Poa ligularis, Piptochaetium napostaense, Stipa clarazii, Stipa tenuis, Stipa tenuissima, Stipa eriostachya, Stipa ambigua, Stipa brachychaeta, Pappophorum subbulbosum, Digitaria californica, Bothriochloa edwardsiana and Aristida subulata.

Methods For each species, phytoliths present in the leaf blades were classified into 47 morphotypes, and their relative frequency determined by observing 300–400 phytoliths per sample (n = 5). Data were analyzed by complete linkage cluster analysis, using the Morisita Index as measure of association.

Key Results The results showed differentiation among phytolith assemblages at species level or at plant functional type level. Cluster analysis separated C3 from C4 species and palatable from non-palatable species.

Conclusions This study highlights the possibility of reconstructing past vegetation in central Argentina grasslands through the analysis of soil phytolith assemblages.

Key words: Poaceae, native grasses, Argentina, phytolith assemblages, grass phytoliths


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
J. Mercader, T. Bennett, C. Esselmont, S. Simpson, and D. Walde
Phytoliths in woody plants from the Miombo woodlands of Mozambique
Ann. Bot., July 1, 2009; 104(1): 91 - 113.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.