Skip Navigation

Annals of Botany 2005 95(1):111-118; doi:10.1093/aob/mci006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by NOIROT, M.
Right arrow Articles by DE KOCHKO, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by NOIROT, M.
Right arrow Articles by DE KOCHKO, A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by NOIROT, M.
Right arrow Articles by DE KOCHKO, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


Annals of Botany 95/1 © Annals of Botany Company 2005; all rights reserved

Investigation on the Causes of Stoichiometric Error in Genome Size Estimation Using Heat Experiments: Consequences on Data Interpretation

MICHEL NOIROT1,*, PHILIPPE BARRE1, CHRISTOPHE DUPERRAY2, SERGE HAMON1 and ALEXANDRE DE KOCHKO1

1 UMR DGPC, Centre IRD de Montpellier, BP 64501, 34394 Montpellier Cedex 5, France and 2 INSERM Unité 291, 99 rue du P. Villa, 34090 Montpellier, France

* For correspondence. E-mail noirot{at}mpl.ird.fr

Received: 29 January 2004    Returned for revision: 23 February 2004    Accepted: 28 April 2004   

Background and Aims In microdensitometry and flow cytometry, estimation of nuclear DNA content in a sample requires a standard with a known nuclear DNA content. It is assumed that dye accessibility to DNA is the same in the sample and standard nuclei. Stoichiometric error arises when dye accessibility is not proportional between the sample and standard. The aim of the present study was to compare the effects of standardization (external–internal) on nuclear fluorescence of two Coffea species and petunia when temperature increases, and the consequences on genome size estimation.

Methods Two coffee tree taxa, C. liberica subsp dewevrei (DEW) and C. pseudozanguebarieae (PSE), and Petunia hybrida were grown in a glasshouse in Montpellier, France. Nuclei were extracted by leaf chopping and at least 2 h after nuclei extraction they were stained with propidium iodide for approx. 3 min just before cytometer processing. In the first experiment, effects of heat treatment were observed in mixed (DEW + petunia) and unmixed extracts (petunia and DEW in separate extracts). Nine temperature treatments were carried out (21, 45, 55, 60, 65, 70, 75, 80 and 85 °C). In a second experiment, effects of heating on within-species genome size variations were investigated in DEW and PSE. Two temperatures (21 and 70 °C) were selected as representative of the maximal range of chromatin decondensation.

Key Results and Conclusions In coffee trees, sample and standard nuclei reacted differently to temperature according to the type of standardization (pseudo-internal vs. external). Cytosolic compounds released in the filtrate would modify chromatin sensitivity to decondensation. Consequently, the ‘genome size’ estimate depended on the temperature. Similarly, intraspecific variations in genome size changed between estimations at 21 °C and 70 °C. Consequences are discussed and stoichiometric error detection methods are proposed, along with proposals for minimizing them.

Key words: Flow cytometry, genome size, stoichiometric error, phenols, intraspecific variation


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
J. Greilhuber
Cytochemistry and C-values: The Less-well-known World of Nuclear DNA Amounts
Ann. Bot., April 1, 2008; 101(6): 791 - 804.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
M. D. Bennett, H. J. Price, and J. S. Johnston
Anthocyanin Inhibits Propidium Iodide DNA Fluorescence in Euphorbia pulcherrima: Implications for Genome Size Variation and Flow Cytometry
Ann. Bot., April 1, 2008; 101(6): 777 - 790.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
J. Loureiro, E. Rodriguez, J. Dolezel, and C. Santos
Two New Nuclear Isolation Buffers for Plant DNA Flow Cytometry: A Test with 37 Species
Ann. Bot., October 1, 2007; 100(4): 875 - 888.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
J. LOUREIRO, E. RODRIGUEZ, J. DOLEZEL, and C. SANTOS
Flow Cytometric and Microscopic Analysis of the Effect of Tannic Acid on Plant Nuclei and Estimation of DNA Content
Ann. Bot., September 1, 2006; 98(3): 515 - 527.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
P. SMARDA and P. BURES
Intraspecific DNA Content Variability in Festuca pallens on Different Geographical Scales and Ploidy Levels
Ann. Bot., September 1, 2006; 98(3): 665 - 678.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
M. D. BENNETT and I. J. LEITCH
Plant Genome Size Research: A Field In Focus
Ann. Bot., January 1, 2005; 95(1): 1 - 6.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
M. D. BENNETT and I. J. LEITCH
Nuclear DNA Amounts in Angiosperms: Progress, Problems and Prospects
Ann. Bot., January 1, 2005; 95(1): 45 - 90.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
J. GREILHUBER
Intraspecific Variation in Genome Size in Angiosperms: Identifying its Existence
Ann. Bot., January 1, 2005; 95(1): 91 - 98.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
M. W. CHASE, L. HANSON, V. A. ALBERT, W. M. WHITTEN, and N. H. WILLIAMS
Life History Evolution and Genome Size in Subtribe Oncidiinae (Orchidaceae)
Ann. Bot., January 1, 2005; 95(1): 191 - 199.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.