Skip Navigation

Annals of Botany 2005 95(2):261-262; doi:10.1093/aob/mci064
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jackson, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jackson, M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Jackson, M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


Annals of Botany 95/2 © Annals of Botany Company 2005; all rights reserved

On-line Working and Open Access Publishing

Mike Jackson, Chief Editor

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.

If there is a theme to this year's editorial it is dealing with change as the technological, commercial and political climate in which we operate continues to evolve rapidly. This time last year, I was optimistic about replacing our existing, largelye-mail based, procedures for manuscript submission and evaluation with the latest version of a well-known web-based system. This anticipated change to our working practice was expected to bring advantages to authors, referees and to the Journal itself, not least because of its potential to shorten the time taken for evaluation work and for accepted papers to be published. But, for very good reasons, a year on finds us still using our old system; a situation that . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?