AOBPreview originally published online on September 26, 2005
Annals of Botany 2005 96(6):1085-1096; doi:10.1093/aob/mci260
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Isozyme Variation and Phylogenetic Relationships in Vicia subgenus Cracca (Fabaceae)
Department of Botany, Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Estonian Agricultural University, 181 Riia str., 51014 Tartu, Estonia
* E-mail vj{at}zbi.ee
Received: 14 February 2005 Returned for revision: 18 May 2005 Accepted: 26 July 2005 Published electronically: 26 September 2005
Background and Aims The phylogenetic relationships among 27 vetch species belonging to the subgenus Cracca of the genus Vicia were studied in comparison with three species of Lathyrus section Lathyrus on the basis of isozyme variation.
Methods Isozymes encoded by 15 putative loci of ten enzymes were resolved by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and isozyme variation was analysed by using parsimony and neighbour-joining methods.
Key Results The analyses revealed 63 parsimony-informative and 36 species-specific orthozymes. Of the latter, 23 are monomophic and are suitable for identification of V. benghalensis, V. palaestina, V. dumetorum, V. pisiformis, V. sylvatica, V. onobrychioides, V. cappadocica, V. cretica, V. articulata, V. tetrasperma, V. ervilia, V. hirsuta and V. loiseleurii. Polymorphism with heterozygous and homozygous isozyme genotypes was found for V. cracca, V. tenuifolia, V. ochroleuca, V. villosa, V. sylvatica, V. cassubica, V. sparsiflora, V. megalotropis, V. altissima, V. onobrychioides, V. cassia, V. cretica and L. heterophyllus, reflecting outcrossing in these species. By contrast, V. benghalensis, V. palaestina, V. disperma, V. dumetorum, V. pisiformis, V. orobus, V. pauciflora, V. tetrasperma and V. loiseleurii had only homozygous isozyme genotypes at polymorphic loci. Isozyme-based phylogenetic trees are presented.
Conclusions Sections Cracca, Ervum, Pedunculatae and Lenticula of traditional taxonomy are monophyletic groups, whereas sections Oroboideae (= Vicilla) and Panduratae appear polyphyletic and section Cassubicae is split into two species-couples linked at a low level of support. Treatment of ervoid species in a separate subgenus Ervum is not supported because of its polyphyly.
Key words: Vicia, subgenus Cracca, genetic diversity, isozymes, phylogenetic relationships, monophyletic groups, systematics