Skip Navigation


AOBPreview originally published online on May 23, 2006
Annals of Botany 2006 98(2):351-360; doi:10.1093/aob/mcl105
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
98/2/351    most recent
mcl105v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by GOODWILLIE, C.
Right arrow Articles by KNIGHT, M. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by GOODWILLIE, C.
Right arrow Articles by KNIGHT, M. C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by GOODWILLIE, C.
Right arrow Articles by KNIGHT, M. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Inbreeding Depression and Mixed Mating in Leptosiphon jepsonii: A Comparison of Three Populations

CAROL GOODWILLIE* and MARY CATHERINE KNIGHT

Department of Biology, East Carolina University, Howell Science Complex, Greenville, NC 27858, USA

* For crrespondence. E-mail goodwilliec{at}mail.ecu.edu

Received: 21 December 2005    Returned for revision: 24 February 2006    Accepted: 24 March 2006    Published electronically: 23 May 2006

Background and Aims Inbreeding depression is thought to play a central role in the evolution and maintenance of cross-fertilization. Theory indicates that inbreeding depression can be purged with self-fertilization, resulting in positive feedback for the selection of selfing. Variation among populations of Leptosiphon jepsonii in the timing and rate of self-fertilization provides an opportunity to study the evolution of inbreeding depression and mating systems. In addition, the hypothesis that differences in inbreeding depression for male and female fitness can stabilize mixed mating in L. jepsonii is tested.

Methods In a growth room experiment, inbreeding depression was measured in three populations with mean outcrossing rates ranging from 0·06 to 0·69. The performance of selfed and outcrossed progeny is compared at five life history stages. To distinguish between self-incompatibility and early inbreeding depression, aborted seeds and unfertilized ovules were counted in selfed and outcrossed fruits. In one population, pollen and ovule production was quantified to estimate inbreeding depression for male and female fitness.

Key Results Both prezygotic barriers and inbreeding depression limited self seed set in the most outcrossing population. Cumulative inbreeding depression ranged from 0·297 to 0·501, with the lowest value found in the most selfing population. Significant inbreeding depression for early life stages was found only in the more outcrossing populations. Inbreeding depression was not significant for pollen or ovule production.

Conclusions The results provide modest support for the hypothesized relationship between inbreeding depression and mating systems. The absence of early inbreeding depression in the more selfing populations is consistent with theory on purging. Differences in male and female expression of inbreeding depression do not appear to stabilize mixed mating in L. jepsonii. The current estimates of inbreeding depression for L. jepsonii differ from those of previous studies, underscoring the effects of environmental variation on its expression.

Key words: Inbreeding depression, Leptosiphon jepsonii, male fitness, mating system, mixed mating, Polemoniaceae, self-incompatibility


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
W.-J. Liao, Y. Hu, B.-R. Zhu, X.-Q. Zhao, Y.-F. Zeng, and D.-Y. Zhang
Female reproductive success decreases with display size in monkshood, Aconitum kusnezoffii (Ranunculaceae)
Ann. Bot., December 1, 2009; 104(7): 1405 - 1412.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
J. Kochankova and B. Mandak
How do population genetic parameters affect germination of the heterocarpic species Atriplex tatarica (Amaranthaceae)?
Ann. Bot., June 1, 2009; 103(8): 1303 - 1313.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
J. J. Weber and C. Goodwillie
Timing of self-compatibility, flower longevity, and potential for male outcross success in Leptosiphon jepsonii (Polemoniaceae)
Am. J. Botany, August 1, 2007; 94(8): 1338 - 1343.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.