Skip Navigation


AOBPreview originally published online on June 6, 2006
Annals of Botany 2006 98(2):411-419; doi:10.1093/aob/mcl113
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
98/2/411    most recent
mcl113v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BRATTELER, M.
Right arrow Articles by WIDMER, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by BRATTELER, M.
Right arrow Articles by WIDMER, A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by BRATTELER, M.
Right arrow Articles by WIDMER, A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

QTL Analysis of Intraspecific Differences between Two Silene vulgaris Ecotypes

MARTIN BRATTELER, MATTHIAS BALTISBERGER and ALEX WIDMER*

ETH Zurich, Institute of Integrative Biology, Plant Ecological Genetics, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland

* For correspondence. E-mail alex.widmer{at}env.ethz.ch

Received: 2 December 2005    Returned for revision: 1 February 2006    Accepted: 24 March 2006    Published electronically: 6 June 2006

• Background and Aims Serpentine soils provide a highly selective substrate for plant colonization and growth and represent an ideal system for studying the evolution of plant-ecotypes. In the present study the aim was to identify the genetic architecture of morphological traits distinguishing serpentine and non-serpentine ecotypes of Silene vulgaris.

• Methods Using an F2 mapping population derived from an intraspecific cross between a serpentine and a non-serpentine ecotype of S. vulgaris, the genetic architecture of 12 morphological traits was explored using a quantitative trait locus (QTL) analysis.

• Key Results The QTL analysis identified a total of 49 QTLs, of which 24 were classified as major QTLs. The mean number of QTLs per trait category was found to correspond well with numbers reported in the literature for similar crosses. Clustering of QTLs for different traits was found on several linkage groups.

• Conclusions Morphological traits that differentiate the two ecotypes are strongly correlated, presumably as a consequence of the joint effects of extensive linkage of QTLs for different traits and directional selection. The signature of consistent directional selection was found for leaf and shoot trait divergence. Intraspecific ecotype differences in S. vulgaris were found to be distributed across the entire genome. The study shows that QTL analyses on non-model organisms can provide novel insights into the genetic basis of plant diversification.

Key words: AFLP, directional selection, ecological divergence, ecotype, habitat adaptation, intraspecific differences, linkage map, QTL, serpentine, Silene vulgaris


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Phil Trans R Soc BHome page
C. Lexer and A. Widmer
The genic view of plant speciation: recent progress and emerging questions
Phil Trans R Soc B, September 27, 2008; 363(1506): 3023 - 3036.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.