Skip Navigation


AOBPreview originally published online on May 30, 2006
Annals of Botany 2006 98(2):431-437; doi:10.1093/aob/mcl119
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
98/2/431    most recent
mcl119v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by GLAETTLI, M.
Right arrow Articles by GOUDET, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by GLAETTLI, M.
Right arrow Articles by GOUDET, J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by GLAETTLI, M.
Right arrow Articles by GOUDET, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Proximity-dependent Pollen Performance in Silene vulgaris

MÉLANIE GLAETTLI1,*, LUCA PESCATORE2 and JÉRÔME GOUDET2

1 Department of Botany, University of Toronto, 25 Willcocks Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 3B2 and 2 Department of Ecology and Evolution, Biology Building, University of Lausanne, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland

* For correspondence. E-mail glaettli{at}botany.utoronto.ca

Received: 22 October 2005    Returned for revision: 15 March 2006    Accepted: 11 April 2006    Published electronically: 30 May 2006

Background and Aims Pollen and seed dispersal in herbaceous insect-pollinated plants are often restricted, inducing strong population structure. To what extent this influences mating within and among patches is poorly understood. This study investigates the influence of population structure on pollen performance using controlled pollinations and genetic markers.

Methods Population structure was investigated in a patchily distributed population of gynodioecious Silene vulgaris in Switzerland using polymorphic microsatellite markers. Experimental pollinations were performed on 21 hermaphrodite recipients using pollen donors at three spatial scales: (a) self-pollination; (b) within-patch cross-pollinations; and (c) between-patch cross-pollinations. Pollen performance was then compared with respect to crossing distance.

Key Results The population of S. vulgaris was characterized by a high degree of genetic sub-structure, with neighbouring plants more related to one another than to distant individuals. Inbreeding probably results from both selfing and biparental inbreeding. Pollen performance increased with distance between mates. Between-patch pollen performed significantly better than both self- and within-patch pollen donors. However, no significant difference was detected between self- and within-patch pollen donors.

Conclusions The results suggest that population structure in animal-pollinated plants is likely to influence mating patterns by favouring cross-pollinations between unrelated plants. However, the extent to which this mechanism could be effective as a pre-zygotic barrier preventing inbred mating depends on the patterns of pollinator foraging and their influence on pollen dispersal.

Key words: Population structure, microsatellites, pollen performance, gynodioecy, Silene vulgaris


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
C. Jolivet and G. Bernasconi
Molecular and Quantitative Genetic Differentiation in European Populations of Silene latifolia (Caryophyllaceae)
Ann. Bot., July 1, 2007; 100(1): 119 - 127.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.