Skip Navigation


AOBPreview originally published online on July 4, 2006
Annals of Botany 2006 98(3):503-514; doi:10.1093/aob/mcl136
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
98/3/503    most recent
mcl136v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by ACKERMANN, M.
Right arrow Articles by WEIGEND, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by ACKERMANN, M.
Right arrow Articles by WEIGEND, M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by ACKERMANN, M.
Right arrow Articles by WEIGEND, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Nectar, Floral Morphology and Pollination Syndrome in Loasaceae subfam. Loasoideae (Cornales)

MARKUS ACKERMANN* and MAXIMILIAN WEIGEND

Institut für Biologie der Freien Universität Berlin, Systematische Botanik und Pflanzengeographie, Altensteinstraße 6, 14195 Berlin, Germany

* For correspondence. E-mail ackermal{at}zedat.fu-berlin.de

Received: 21 February 2006    Returned for revision: 20 March 2006    Accepted: 19 May 2006    Published electronically: 4 July 2006

Background and Aims Loasaceae subfam. Loasoideae are mostly distributed in South America (sea level to over 4500 m) with a wide range of animals documented as pollinators. The aim was to investigate correlations between nectar parameters, flower morphology, pollination syndrome and phylogeny.

Methods Nectar was collected from 29 species from seven genera in the subfamily. Concentration and volumes were measured and the amount of sugar calculated. Correlations of nectar data were plotted on a ternary graph and nectar characteristics compared with flower visitors, floral morphology and phylogenetic data.

Key Results Sugar concentrations are generally higher than reported for most plant families in the literature. The species investigated can be roughly grouped as follows. Group I: plants with approx. 1·5(–3·5) µL nectar with (40–)60–80 % sugar and 0·19–2 mg sugar flower–1; with small, white, star-shaped corollas, pollinated by short-tongued bees. Groups II, III and IV: plants with mostly orange, balloon-, saucer-, bowl- or bell-shaped corollas. Group II: plants with approx. 9–14 µL nectar with 40–60 % sugar and 4–10 mg sugar flower–1; mostly visited by long-tongued bees and/or hummingbirds. Group III: plants with 40–100 µL nectar with 30–40 % sugar and 14–36 mg sugar flower–1, mostly visited by hummingbirds. Group IV: geoflorous plants with 80–90 µL with 10–15 % sugar and 8·5–12 mg sugar flower–1, presumably visited by small mammals. Groups II and III include species visited by bees and/or hummingbirds.

Conclusions Pollinator switches from short-tongued bees via long-tongued bees to hummingbirds appear to have taken place repeatedly in the genera Nasa, Loasa and Caiophora. Changes in nectar amount and concentration appear to evolve rapidly with little phylogenetic constraint.

Key words: Nectar, pollination, Caiophora, Loasa, Nasa, Loasaceae, short-tongued bees, long-tongued bees, Colletidae, Apidae, Anthophoridae, rodents, ornithophily


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
M. Ackermann, M. Achatz, and M. Weigend
Hybridization and crossability in Caiophora (Loasaceae subfam. Loasoideae): Are interfertile species and inbred populations results of a recent radiation?
Am. J. Botany, September 1, 2008; 95(9): 1109 - 1121.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.