Skip Navigation


AOBPreview originally published online on March 20, 2007
Annals of Botany 2007 99(5):1017-1021; doi:10.1093/aob/mcm026
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
99/5/1017    most recent
mcm026v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Grime, J. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Grime, J. P.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Grime, J. P.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

The Scale–Precision Trade-off in Spacial Resource Foraging by Plants: Restoring Perspective

J. P. Grime

Unit of Comparative Plant Ecology, Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, The University, Sheffield, S10 2TN, UK

For correspondence. E-mail j.p.grime{at}sheffield.ac.uk

Received: 22 November 2006    Returned for revision: 13 December 2006    Accepted: 11 January 2007    Published electronically: 20 March 2007

Background and Aims: From the results of a comparative study using quantitative standardized assays of the scale and precision of responses of root and shoot systems to resource patchiness, Campbell et al. (1991; Oecologia 87: 532–538) proposed a mechanism of species coexistence in herbaceous communities involving a dynamic equilibrium between, respectively, the coarse- and fine-scale foraging of dominant and subordinate species. The purpose of this paper is to reject a recent assertion that with respect to root systems the scale–precision hypothesis has been falsified.

Discussion and Conclusion: Reference to the original papers confirms that the scope of the hypothesis was confined to circumstances (eg. mown meadows) where the vigour of potential dominants is restricted by intermittent removal of biomass. This qualification in the original hypothesis is a crucial omission from the meta-analysis conducted by Kembel and Cahill (2005; American Naturalist 166: 216–230). The original papers also contain examples that illustrate the operation of forms of selection that prevent the development of precise foraging below ground; these also appear to have escaped the attention of recent participants in this field of research.

Key words: Resource foraging, scale/precision trade-off, nutrient supply


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
G. G. McNickle and J. F. Cahill Jr.
Plant root growth and the marginal value theorem
PNAS, March 24, 2009; 106(12): 4747 - 4751.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
S. W. Kembel, H. De Kroon, J. F. Cahill Jr., and L. Mommer
Improving the Scale and Precision of Hypotheses to Explain Root Foraging Ability
Ann. Bot., June 1, 2008; 101(9): 1295 - 1301.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
B. Shipley
Comparative Plant Ecology as a Tool for Integrating Across Scales
Ann. Bot., May 1, 2007; 99(5): 965 - 966.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.