Skip Navigation



AOBPreview published online on September 4, 2002

Annals of Botany, doi:10.1093/aob/mcf208
© 2002 by Annals of Botany Company
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
90/4/437    most recent
mcf208v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by ZOTZ, G.
Right arrow Articles by VALLADARES, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by ZOTZ, G.
Right arrow Articles by VALLADARES, F.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by ZOTZ, G.
Right arrow Articles by VALLADARES, F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Submitted on March 15, 2002
Revised on June 3, 2002
Accepted on June 18, 2002

A Simulation Study on the Importance of Size-related Changes in Leaf Morphology and Physiology for Carbon Gain in an Epiphytic Bromeliad

GERHARD ZOTZ1*, PETER REICHLING2, and FERNANDO VALLADARES3

Affiliation of the authors: 1 Institute of Botany, University of Basel, Switzerland,; Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Balboa, Panama,; 2 Lehrstuhl für Botanik II der Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany and; 3 Centro de Ciencias Medioambientales, CSIC, Serrano 115, E-28006 Madrid, Spain

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: Gerhard.zotz{at}unibas.ch.

This study addresses the question of how size-related changes in leaf morphology and physiology influence light absorption and carbon gain of the epiphytic bromeliad Vriesea sanguinolenta. A geometrically based computer model, Y-plant, was used for the three-dimensional reconstruction of entire plants and for calculation of whole plant light interception and carbon gain. Plants of different sizes were reconstructed, and morphological and physiological attributes of young and old leaves, and small and large plants were combined to examine the individual effects of each factor on light absorption and carbon gain of the plant. The influence of phyllotaxis on light absorption was also explored. Departure of measured divergence angles between successive leaves from the ideal 137·5° slightly decreased light absorption. The only morphological parameter that consistently changed with plant size was leaf shape: larger plants produced more slender foliage, which substantially reduced self-shading. Nevertheless, self-shading increased with plant size. While the maximum rate of net CO2 uptake of leaves increased linearly with plant size by a factor of two from the smallest to the largest individual, the potential plant carbon gain (based on total foliage area) showed a curvilinear relationship, but with similar numerical variation. We conclude that leaf physiology has a greater impact on plant carbon gain than leaf and plant morphology in this epiphytic bromeliad.


Key words: Crown architecture, ecophysiology, epiphytes, light capture, modelling, photosynthesis, plant size, scaling, Vriesea sanguinolenta.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
M. Onate and S. Munne-Bosch
Influence of plant maturity, shoot reproduction and sex on vegetative growth in the dioecious plant Urtica dioica
Ann. Bot., October 1, 2009; 104(5): 945 - 956.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
G. ZOTZ and A. RICHTER
Changes in Carbohydrate and Nutrient Contents Throughout a Reproductive Cycle Indicate that Phosphorus is a Limiting Nutrient in the Epiphytic Bromeliad, Werauhia sanguinolenta
Ann. Bot., May 1, 2006; 97(5): 745 - 754.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.