Skip Navigation



AOBPreview published online on December 19, 2002

Annals of Botany, doi:10.1093/aob/mcg029
© 2002 by Annals of Botany Company
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
91/3/361    most recent
mcg029v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by YIN, X.
Right arrow Articles by SPIERTZ, H. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by YIN, X.
Right arrow Articles by SPIERTZ, H. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by YIN, X.
Right arrow Articles by SPIERTZ, H. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Submitted on June 21, 2002
Revised on August 30, 2002
Accepted on November 6, 2002

A Flexible Sigmoid Function of Determinate Growth

XINYOU YIN1*, JAN GOUDRIAAN1, EGBERT A. LANTINGA1, JAN VOS1, and HUUB J. SPIERTZ1

Affiliation of the authors: 1 Department of Plant Sciences, Wageningen University, PO Box 430, 6700 AK Wageningen, The Netherlands

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: Xinyou.Yin{at}wur.nl.

A new empirical equation for the sigmoid pattern of determinate growth, ‘the beta growth function', is presented. It calculates weight (w) in dependence of time, using the following three parameters: tm, the time at which the maximum growth rate is obtained; te, the time at the end of growth; and wmax, the maximal value for w, which is achieved at te. The beta growth function was compared with four classical (logistic, Richards, Gompertz and Weibull) growth equations, and two expolinear equations. All equations described successfully the sigmoid dynamics of seed filling, plant growth and crop biomass production. However, differences were found in estimating wmax. Features of the beta function are: (1) like the Richards equation it is flexible in describing various asymmetrical sigmoid patterns (its symmetrical form is a cubic polynomial); (2) like the logistic and the Gompertz equations its parameters are numerically stable in statistical estimation; (3) like the Weibull function it predicts zero mass at time zero, but its extension to deal with various initial conditions can be easily obtained; (4) relative to the truncated expolinear equation it provides more reasonable estimates of final quantity and duration of a growth process. In addition, the new function predicts a zero growth rate at both the start and end of a precisely defined growth period. Therefore, it is unique for dealing with determinate growth, and is more suitable than other functions for embedding in process-based crop simulation models to describe the dynamics of organs as sinks to absorb assimilates. Because its parameters correspond to growth traits of interest to crop scientists, the beta growth function is suitable for characterization of environmental and genotypic influences on growth processes. However, it is not suitable for estimating maximum relative growth rate to characterize early growth that is expected to be close to exponential.


Key words: Growth duration, modelling, non-linear regression, sigmoid curve.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
A. Mathieu, P. H. Cournede, V. Letort, D. Barthelemy, and P. de Reffye
A dynamic model of plant growth with interactions between development and functional mechanisms to study plant structural plasticity related to trophic competition
Ann. Bot., June 1, 2009; 103(8): 1173 - 1186.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
A. Vocanson and M.-H. Jeuffroy
Agronomic Performance of Different Pea Cultivars Under Various Sowing Periods and Contrasting Soil Structures
Agron. J., May 7, 2008; 100(3): 748 - 759.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
A. M. Bastidas, T. D. Setiyono, A. Dobermann, K. G. Cassman, R. W. Elmore, G. L. Graef, and J. E. Specht
Soybean Sowing Date: The Vegetative, Reproductive, and Agronomic Impacts
Crop Sci., March 19, 2008; 48(2): 727 - 740.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
J. B. EVERS, J. VOS, B. ANDRIEU, and P. C. STRUIK
Cessation of Tillering in Spring Wheat in Relation to Light Interception and Red : Far-red Ratio
Ann. Bot., April 1, 2006; 97(4): 649 - 658.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
J. E. SHEEHY, P. L. MITCHELL, and A. B. FERRER
Bi-Phasic Growth Patterns in Rice
Ann. Bot., December 1, 2004; 94(6): 811 - 817.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.