AOBPreview published online on April 3, 2003
Annals of Botany, doi:10.1093/aob/mcg081
© 2003 by Annals of Botany Company
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Submitted on October 15, 2002
Affiliation of the authors:
1 Facultad de Agronomía, UBA, Av. San Martín 4453, Buenos Aires, Argentina;
2 CSIRO Land & Water, Waite Campus, PMB 2 Glen Osmond 5065, Australia
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: clavega{at}mdp. edu. ar.
Links were investigated between allometry of plant growth and dynamics of size structure of well-fertilized, irrigated crops of soybean (Glycine max L.), sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) and maize (Zea mays L.) grown at standard plant-population densities (D), as in commercial crops (D = 30, 6 and 8·5 plants m-2, respectively), and at high densities (2D). Patterns of size-dependent growth of shoot and seed mass accumulation were distinctly different among species. In soybean and sunflower, non-linear relationships between size and subsequent growth led to strong hierarchical populations in terms of both shoot and seed biomass. Curvilinear (soybean) and sigmoid (sunflower) size-dependent growth determined strongly asymmetrical (soybean) and bimodal (sunflower) frequency distributions of shoot biomass indicating predominantly size asymmetrical competition among individuals. In comparison, a lower plant-to-plant variation coupled with a typical linear allometry of growth to plant size indicated symmetrical two-sided plant interference in maize. Despite the weak development of hierarchies in shoot biomass, a strong inequality in reproductive output developed in crowded populations of maize indicating an apparent breakage of reproductive allometry.
Revised on December 19, 2002
Accepted on February 4, 2003
Size-Dependent Growth and the Development Of Inequality in Maize, Sunflower and Soybean
C. R. C. VEGA1* and V. O. SADRAS2
Key words: Helianthus annuus L., Zea maize L., Glycine max L. Merrill, size inequality, reproductive allometry, bimodality, mode of competition, asymmetry, barrenness, growth functions.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  W. Liu and M. Tollenaar Response of Yield Heterosis to Increasing Plant Density in Maize Crop Sci., September 1, 2009; 49(5): 1807 - 1816. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Borras, J. P. Astini, M. E. Westgate, and A. D. Severini Modeling Anthesis to Silking in Maize Using a Plant Biomass Framework Crop Sci., May 11, 2009; 49(3): 937 - 948. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. L. Martin, P. J. Hodgen, K. W. Freeman, R. Melchiori, D. B. Arnall, R. K. Teal, R. W. Mullen, K. Desta, S. B. Phillips, J. B. Solie, et al. Plant-to-Plant Variability in Corn Production Agron. J., November 17, 2005; 97(6): 1603 - 1611. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. H. Andrade and P. E. Abbate Response of Maize and Soybean to Variability in Stand Uniformity Agron. J., July 13, 2005; 97(4): 1263 - 1269. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|