Skip Navigation



AOBPreview published online on July 18, 2003

Annals of Botany, doi:10.1093/aob/mcg148
© 2003 by Annals of Botany Company
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
92/3/365    most recent
mcg148v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MARTÍNEZ, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by LÓPEZ-PORTILLO, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by MARTÍNEZ, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by LÓPEZ-PORTILLO, J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by MARTÍNEZ, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by LÓPEZ-PORTILLO, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Submitted on October 21, 2002
Revised on April 1, 2003
Accepted on May 20, 2003

Growth and Architecture of Small Honey Mesquites under Jackrabbit Browsing: Overcoming the Disadvantage of being Eaten

ARMANDO J. MARTÍNEZ1 and JORGE LÓPEZ-PORTILLO2*

Affiliation of the authors: 1 Laboratorio de Ecología del Comportamiento, Centro de Investigaciones Fisiológicas, Universidad Autónoma de Tlaxcala, carr. Tlaxcala-Puebla km 1·5 s/n Tlaxcala,Tlaxcala 90070 Tlaxcala, México; 2 Instituto de Ecología, AC Departamento de Ecología Vegetal, Apartado Postal 63 Xalapa 91000 Veracruz, México

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: lopez-p{at}ecologia.edu.mx.

Browsing is an important mortality factor in seedlings and small plants. However, the induced changes in the architecture of plant survivors may influence subsequent browsing, opening the possibility of compensating for the damage done. How jackrabbit (Lepus californicus) browsing affects the growth and architecture of small individuals of honey mesquite, Prosopis glandulosa var. torreyana, a tree/shrub that produces spines at every node, was explored. Naturally established mesquites of unknown age were selected in one site, and 2-year-old mesquites were transplanted in another site. In both cases, half of them were exposed to jackrabbits and the other half were excluded as controls. After 4 years, shoot production (height, length and number of derived shoots) and plant growth (height and cover) increased 1·4-2·5-fold in naturally established controls relative to exposed plants, depending on the measured variable. In the transplant experiment, the increases were 2·8-7·1-fold in controls relative to exposed plants 2 years after initiation of the experiment. The net loss of biomass in treatment vs. control plants in these experiments suggests a negative response to browsing which has been defined as under-compensation. Alternative architectures in honey mesquites were evident at the end of the exclusion experiments: controls had long branches and an extended crown cover, while exposed plants had short branches and a compact crown cover. Results indicated that mesquites were able to grow under browser pressure by packing many stems in a compact matrix armed with spines and producing one or more shoots tall and wide enough to escape from jackrabbits.


Key words: Exclusion treatments, honey mesquite, jackrabbit browsing, Lepus californicus, spines as mechanical defences, plant architecture and growth, Prosopis glandulosa var. torreyana, semi-arid communities, stem modular demography.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
H. F. Causin, T. W. Rufty, and J. F. Reynolds
Gas exchange and carbon metabolism in two Prosopis species (Fabaceae) from semiarid habitats: effects of elevated CO2, N supply, and N source
Am. J. Botany, May 1, 2006; 93(5): 716 - 723.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.