Skip Navigation



AOBPreview published online on October 8, 2003

Annals of Botany, doi:10.1093/aob/mcg201
© 2003 by Annals of Botany Company
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
92/6/771    most recent
mcg201v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by GROSS, C. L.
Right arrow Articles by MULLIGAN, D. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by GROSS, C. L.
Right arrow Articles by MULLIGAN, D. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by GROSS, C. L.
Right arrow Articles by MULLIGAN, D. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Submitted on May 14, 2003
Revised on July 11, 2003
Accepted on September 2, 2003

Floral Structure, Breeding System and Fruit-set in the Threatened Sub-shrub Tetratheca juncea Smith (Tremandraceae)

C. L. GROSS1*, F. V. BARTIER2, and D. R. MULLIGAN2

Affiliation of the authors: 1 Ecosystem Management, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia and; 2 Centre for Mined Land Rehabilitation, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: cgross{at}metz.une.edu.au.

Tetratheca juncea Smith (Tremandraceae) has undergone a range contraction of approx. 50 km in the last 100 years and is now listed as a vulnerable sub-shrub restricted to the central and north coast regions of New South Wales, Australia. There are approx. 250 populations in a 110 km north-south distribution and populations are usually small with fewer than 50 plants/clumps. The reproductive ecology of the species was studied to determine why seed-set is reportedly rare. Flowers are bisexual, odourless and nectarless. Flowers are presented dependentally and there are eight stamens recurved around the pistil. Anthers are poricidal, contain viable pollen and basally contain a deep-red tapetal fluid that is slightly oily. Thus flowers are presented for buzz pollinators, although none were observed at flowers during our study. The species was found to be facultatively xenogamous with only one in 50 glasshouse flowers setting seed autogamously, i.e. without pollinator assistance. Field studies revealed fertile fruit in 24 populations but production varied significantly across sites from exceedingly low (0·6 fruits per plant clump) to low (17 fruits per plant clump). Fruit-set ranged from 0 to 65 %, suggesting that pollen vectors exist or that autogamy levels in the field are variable and higher than glasshouse results. Fruit production did not vary with population size, although in three of the five populations in the south-west region more than twice as much fruit was produced as in populations elsewhere. A moderately strong relationship between foliage volume and fruit : flower ratios suggests that bigger plants may be more attractive than smaller plants to pollinators. A review of Tetratheca pollination ecology revealed that several species are poorly fecund and pollinators are rare. The habitat requirements for Tetratheca, a genus of many rare and threatened species, is discussed.


Key words: Poricidal anthers, reproductive success, population size, range decline, plant size, threatened species, Tetratheca juncea, Tremandraceae.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
C. L. Gross and H. A. R. Caddy
Are differences in breeding mechanisms and fertility among populations contributing to rarity in Grevillea rhizomatosa (Proteaceae)?
Am. J. Botany, December 1, 2006; 93(12): 1791 - 1799.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.