Skip Navigation



AOBPreview published online on February 23, 2004

Annals of Botany, doi:10.1093/aob/mch053
© 2004 by Annals of Botany Company
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
93/4/399    most recent
mch053v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by POONNACHIT, U.
Right arrow Articles by DARNELL, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by POONNACHIT, U.
Right arrow Articles by DARNELL, R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by POONNACHIT, U.
Right arrow Articles by DARNELL, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Submitted on July 24, 2003
Revised on October 6, 2003
Accepted on December 12, 2003

Effect of Ammonium and Nitrate on Ferric Chelate Reductase and Nitrate Reductase in Vaccinium Species

U. POONNACHIT1 and R. DARNELL1*

Affiliation of the authors: 1 Horticultural Sciences Department, University of Florida, PO Box 110690, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: rld{at}ufl.edu.

Background and Aims Most Vaccinium species have strict soil requirements for optimal growth, requiring low pH, high iron availability and nitrogen primarily in the ammonium form. These soils are limited and are often located near wetlands. Vaccinium arboreum is a wild species adapted to a wide range of soils, including high pH, low iron, and nitrate-containing soils. This broader soil adaptation in V. arboreum may be related to increased efficiency of iron or nitrate uptake compared with the cultivated Vaccinium species.

Methods Nitrate, ammonium and iron uptake, and nitrate reductase (NR) and ferric chelate reductase (FCR) activities were compared in two Vaccinium species grown hydroponically in either nitrate or ammonia, with or without iron. The species studied were the wild V. arboreum and the cultivated V. corymbosum interspecific hybrid, which exhibits the strict soil requirements of most Vaccinium species.

Key Results Ammonium uptake was significantly greater than nitrate uptake in both species, while nitrate uptake was greater in the wild species, V. arboreum, compared with the cultivated species, V. corymbosum. The increased nitrate uptake in V. arboreum was correlated with increased root NR activity compared with V. corymbosum. The lower nitrate uptake in V. corymbosum was reflected in decreased plant dry weight in this species compared with V. arboreum. Root FCR activity increased significantly in V. corymbosum grown under iron-deficient conditions, compared with the same species grown under iron-sufficient conditions or with V. arboreum grown under either iron condition.

Conclusions. V. arboreum appears to be more efficient in acquiring nitrate compared with V. corymbosum, possibly due to increased NR activity and this may partially explain the wider soil adaptation of V. arboreum.


Key words: Ferric chelate reductase, iron uptake, nitrate reductase, nitrogen uptake, Vaccinium.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
C. W. Jin, S. T. Du, Y. S. Zhang, X. Y. Lin, and C. X. Tang
Differential regulatory role of nitric oxide in mediating nitrate reductase activity in roots of tomato (Solanum lycocarpum)
Ann. Bot., July 1, 2009; 104(1): 9 - 17.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
J. Ruan, J. Gerendas, R. Hardter, and B. Sattelmacher
Effect of Nitrogen Form and Root-zone pH on Growth and Nitrogen Uptake of Tea (Camellia sinensis) Plants
Ann. Bot., February 1, 2007; 99(2): 301 - 310.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.