AOBPreview published online on February 23, 2004
Annals of Botany, doi:10.1093/aob/mch054
© 2004 by Annals of Botany Company
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Submitted on July 31, 2003
Affiliation of the authors:
1 UMR 1098 Biologie du développement des Espèces Pérennes Cultivées, INRA-ENSAM-IRD-CIRAD, Equipe ‘Architecture et Fonctionnement des Espèces Fruitières’, 2 Place Viala, 34060 Montpellier Cedex 1, France
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: talmeras{at}hotmail.com.
• Background and Aims Stem shape in angiosperms depends on several growth traits such as elongation direction, amount and position of axillary loads, stem dimensions, wood elasticity, radial growth dynamics and active re-orientation due to tension wood. This paper analyses the relationship between these biomechanical factors and stem shape variability. • Methods Three apricot tree varieties with contrasting stem shape were studied. Growth and bending dynamics, mechanical properties and amount of tension wood were measured on 40 1-year-old stems of each variety during one growth season. Formulae derived from simple biomechanical models are proposed to quantify the relationship between biomechanical factors and re-orientation of the stems. The effect of biomechanical factors is quantified combining their mechanical sensitivity and their actual variability. • Key results Re-orientations happened in three main periods, involving distinct biomechanical phenomena: (a) passive bending due to the increase of shoot and fruit load at the start of the season; (b) passive uprighting at the fall of fruits; (c) active uprighting due tension wood production at the end of the season. Differences between varieties mainly happened during periods (a) and (b). • Conclusions The main factors causing differences between varieties are the length/diameter and the load/cross-sectional area ratios during period (a). Wood elasticity does not play an important role because of its low inter-variety variability. Differences during period (b) are related to the dynamics of radial growth: varieties with early radial growth bend weakly upward because the new wood layers tend to set them in a bent position. The action of tension wood during period (c) is low when compared with passive phenomena involved in periods (a) and (b).
Revised on November 3, 2003
Accepted on December 3, 2003
Identification of Biomechanical Factors Involved in Stem Shape Variability between Apricot Tree Varieties
TANCREDE ALMÉRAS1*,
Key words: Biomechanics, modelling, tree architecture, stem shape, growth dynamics, re-orientation, Prunus armeniaca.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  B. Moulia and M. Fournier The power and control of gravitropic movements in plants: a biomechanical and systems biology view J. Exp. Bot., February 1, 2009; 60(2): 461 - 486. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. Martin, N. Leblanc-Fournier, W. Azri, C. Lenne, C. Henry, C. Coutand, and J.-L. Julien Characterization and expression analysis under bending and other abiotic factors of PtaZFP2, a poplar gene encoding a Cys2/His2 zinc finger protein Tree Physiol, January 1, 2009; 29(1): 125 - 136. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. Jaouen, T. Almeras, C. Coutand, and M. Fournier How to determine sapling buckling risk with only a few measurements Am. J. Botany, October 1, 2007; 94(10): 1583 - 1593. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H.-Hee. Han, C. Coutand, H. Cochard, C. Trottier, and P.-E. Lauri Effects of shoot bending on lateral fate and hydraulics: invariant and changing traits across five apple genotypes J. Exp. Bot., October 1, 2007; 58(13): 3537 - 3547. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. Louarn, Y. Guedon, J. Lecoeur, and E. Lebon Quantitative Analysis of the Phenotypic Variability of Shoot Architecture in Two Grapevine (Vitis vinifera) Cultivars Ann. Bot., March 1, 2007; 99(3): 425 - 437. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. W. Telewski A unified hypothesis of mechanoperception in plants Am. J. Botany, October 1, 2006; 93(10): 1466 - 1476. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|