AOBPreview published online on March 22, 2004
Annals of Botany, doi:10.1093/aob/mch079
© 2004 by Annals of Botany Company
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Submitted on October 13, 2003
Affiliation of the authors:
1 Department of Crop Production, University of Almería, Almería, Spain;
2 Department of Pomology, University of California, Davis, USA
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: vspolito{at}ucdavis.edu.
• Background and Aims Andromonoecy, as a breeding system, has generated a considerable body of theory in terms of sexual selection, but extended records comparing the performance of pollen grains from staminate versus hermaphrodite flowers are still sparse. The objective in this study was to elucidate the role of staminate flowers in the andromonoecious breeding system of olive (Olea europaea). • Methods To determine the meaning of staminate flowers, an evaluation was made of resource allocation to, and phenology of, staminate and hermaphrodite flowers in the cultivar ‘Mission’, and a comparison was made of the male function between both kinds of flowers. • Key Results Dry weight of hermaphrodite flowers was 19 % greater than dry weight of staminate flowers arising in comparable positions of the panicle. This difference was mainly due to pistil and petal weight; there were no significant differences in stamen weight. There were no significant differences between staminate and hermaphrodite flowers in either amount of pollen per anther, or pollen quality as determined by pollen viability, germinability or ability to fertilize other flowers. There was no significant link between gender and time of anthesis. However, position of the flower within the panicle correlated with time of anthesis and gender. Flowers at the apex and at primary pedicels tended to be hermaphrodite and open earlier, whereas flowers arising in secondary pedicels were mainly staminate and were commonly the last to reach anthesis. • Conclusions It is proposed that the main advantage provided by production of staminate flowers in olive is to enhance male fitness by increasing pollen output at the whole plant level, although a relict function of attracting pollinators cannot be completely discarded.
Revised on November 20, 2003
Accepted on January 9, 2004
The Role of Staminate Flowers in the Breeding System of Olea europaea (Oleaceae): an Andromonoecious, Wind-pollinated Taxon
JULIÁN CUEVAS1 and VITO S. POLITO2*
Key words: Andromonoecy, olive, Olea europaea, male function, wind pollination, pistil abortion.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  L. C. Kouonon, A.-L. Jacquemart, A. I. Zoro Bi, P. Bertin, J.-P. Baudoin, and Y. Dje Reproductive biology of the andromonoecious Cucumis melo subsp. agrestis (Cucurbitaceae) Ann. Bot., November 1, 2009; 104(6): 1129 - 1139. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Quesada-Aguilar, S. Kalisz, and T.-L. Ashman Flower morphology and pollinator dynamics in Solanum carolinense (Solanaceae): implications for the evolution of andromonoecy Am. J. Botany, August 1, 2008; 95(8): 974 - 984. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Narbona, P. L. Ortiz, and M. Arista Sexual Dimorphism in the Andromonoecious Euphorbia nicaeensis: Effects of Gender and Inflorescence Development Ann. Bot., April 1, 2008; 101(5): 717 - 726. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|