Skip Navigation



AOBPreview published online on July 26, 2004

Annals of Botany, doi:10.1093/aob/mch166
© 2004 by Annals of Botany Company
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
94/3/473    most recent
mch166v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by IIJIMA, M.
Right arrow Articles by BARLOW, P. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by IIJIMA, M.
Right arrow Articles by BARLOW, P. W.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by IIJIMA, M.
Right arrow Articles by BARLOW, P. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Submitted on April 5, 2004
Revised on May 24, 2004
Accepted on June 11, 2004

Contribution of Root Cap Mucilage and Presence of an Intact Root Cap in Maize (Zea mays) to the Reduction of Soil Mechanical Impedance

MORIO IIJIMA1*, TOSHIFUMI HIGUCHI1, and PETER W. BARLOW2

Affiliation of the authors: 1 Graduate School of Bioagricultural Sciences, Nagoya University, Chikusa, Nagoya 464-8601, Japan; 2 School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Woodland Road, Bristol BS8 1UG, UK

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: miijima{at}agr.nagoya-u.ac.jp.

Background and Aims The impedance to root growth imposed by soil can be decreased by both mucilage secretion and the sloughing of border cells from the root cap. The aim of this study is to quantify the contribution of these two factors for maize root growth in compact soil.

Methods These effects were evaluated by assessing growth after removing both mucilage (treatment I - intact) and the root cap (treatment D - decapped) from the root tip, and then by adding back 2 µL of mucilage to both intact (treatment IM - intact plus mucilage) and decapped (treatment DM - decapped plus mucilage) roots. Roots were grown in either loose (0·9 Mg m-3) or compact (1·5 Mg m-3) loamy sand soils. Also examined were the effects of decapping on root penetration resistance at three soil bulk densities (1·3, 1·4 and 1·5 Mg m-3).

Key Results In treatment I, mucilage was visible 12 h after transplanting to the compact soil. The decapping and mucilage treatments affected neither the root elongation nor the root widening rates when the plants were grown in loose soil for 12 h. Root growth pressures of seminal axes in D, DM, I and IM treatments were 0·328, 0·288, 0·272 and 0·222 MPa, respectively, when the roots were grown in compact soil (1·5 Mg m-3 density; 1·59 MPa penetrometer resistance).

Conclusions The contributions of mucilage and presence of the intact root cap without mucilage to the lubricating effect of root cap (percentage decrease in root penetration resistance caused by decapping) were 43% and 58%, respectively. The lubricating effect of the root cap was about 30% and unaffected by the degree of soil compaction (for penetrometer resistances of 0·52, 1·20 and 1·59 MPa).

Keywords: Border cell, decapping, lubricating effect, maize, mucilage, root cap, root growth pressure, sloughed cells, soil mechanical impedance, soil compaction, Zea mays.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol PlantHome page
A. Hahn, R. Zimmermann, D. Wanke, K. Harter, and H. G. Edelmann
The Root Cap Determines Ethylene-Dependent Growth and Development in Maize Roots
Mol Plant, March 1, 2008; 1(2): 359 - 367.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
A. G. Bengough, M. F. Bransby, J. Hans, S. J. McKenna, T. J. Roberts, and T. A. Valentine
Root responses to soil physical conditions; growth dynamics from field to cell
J. Exp. Bot., January 1, 2006; 57(2): 437 - 447.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.