Skip Navigation



AOBPreview published online on August 19, 2004

Annals of Botany, doi:10.1093/aob/mch173
© 2004 by Annals of Botany Company
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
94/4/507    most recent
mch173v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by ZWIENIECKI, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by HOLBROOK, N. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by ZWIENIECKI, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by HOLBROOK, N. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by ZWIENIECKI, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by HOLBROOK, N. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Submitted on March 16, 2004
Revised on May 17, 2004
Accepted on June 18, 2004

Functional Design Space of Single-veined Leaves: Role of Tissue Hydraulic Properties in Constraining Leaf Size and Shape

MACIEJ A. ZWIENIECKI1*, C. KEVIN BOYCE2, and N. MICHELE HOLBROOK1

Affiliation of the authors: 1 Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, 16 Divinity Ave, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA; 2 Department of Geophysical Sciences, University of Chicago, 5734 S. Ellis Ave, Chicago, IL 60637, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: mzwienie{at}oeb.harvard.edu.

Background and Aims Morphological diversity of leaves is usually quantified with geometrical characters, while in many cases a simple set of biophysical parameters are involved in constraining size and shape. One of the main physiological functions of the leaf is transpiration and thus one can expect that leaf hydraulic parameters can be used to predict potential morphologies, although with the caveat that morphology in turn influences physiological parameters including light interception and boundary layer thickness and thereby heat transfer and net photosynthesis.

Methods An iterative model was used to determine the relative sizes and shapes that are functionally possible for single-veined leaves as defined by their ability to supply the entire leaf lamina with sufficient water to prevent stomatal closure. The model variables include the hydraulic resistances associated with vein axial and radial transport, as well as with water movement through the mesophyll and the leaf surface.

Key Results The four parameters included in the model are sufficient to define a hydraulic functional design space that includes all single-veined leaf shapes found in nature, including scale-, awl- and needle-like morphologies. This exercise demonstrates that hydraulic parameters have dissimilar effects: surface resistance primarily affects leaf size, while radial and mesophyll resistances primarily affect leaf shape.

Conclusions These distinctions between hydraulic parameters, as well as the differential accessibility of different morphologies, might relate to the convergent evolutionary patterns seen in a variety of fossil lineages concerning overall morphology and anatomical detail that frequently have evolved in linear and simple multi-veined leaves.

Keywords: Morphospace, leaves, functional design space, leaf hydraulics, leaf size, leaf shape.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Plant EcolHome page
T. Whitman and L. W. Aarssen
The leaf size/number trade-off in herbaceous angiosperms
J Plant Ecol, October 4, 2009; (2009) rtp018v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PaleobiologyHome page
C. K. Boyce
How green was Cooksonia? The importance of size in understanding the early evolution of physiology in the vascular plant lineage
Paleobiology, March 1, 2008; 34(2): 179 - 194.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
U. Niinemets, A. Portsmuth, D. Tena, M. Tobias, S. Matesanz, and F. Valladares
Do we Underestimate the Importance of Leaf Size in Plant Economics? Disproportional Scaling of Support Costs Within the Spectrum of Leaf Physiognomy
Ann. Bot., August 1, 2007; 100(2): 283 - 303.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.