Skip Navigation



AOBPreview published online on August 11, 2004

Annals of Botany, doi:10.1093/aob/mch177
© 2004 by Annals of Botany Company
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
94/4/583    most recent
mch177v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by WANG, Y.-Q.
Right arrow Articles by CHEN, Z.-Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by WANG, Y.-Q.
Right arrow Articles by CHEN, Z.-Y.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by WANG, Y.-Q.
Right arrow Articles by CHEN, Z.-Y.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Submitted on March 26, 2004
Revised on May 13, 2004
Accepted on June 29, 2004

Pollen Histochemistry and Pollen: Ovule Ratios in Zingiberaceae

YING-QIANG WANG1, DIAN-XIANG ZHANG2*, and ZHONG-YI CHEN2

Affiliation of the authors: 1 South China Botanical Garden, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510650, China; Zhongkai Agrotechnical College, Guangzhou 510225, China; 2 South China Botanical Garden, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510650, China

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: dx-zhang{at}scib.ac.cn.

Background and Aims Pollen grains of 37 species from 11 genera in the family Zingiberaceae were examined to assess qualitatively starch or lipid contents; the pollen grain and ovule numbers per flower and pollen: ovule ratios were also counted and calculated. Pollen: ovule ratios were studied to reveal patterns of variation in the Zingiberaceae.

Methods Freshly open flowers with dehiscing anthers were collected at random from plants growing in natural habitats or in botanical gardens. Presence of lipids or starch in pollen grains was tested by Sudan solution and IKI solution, respectively, and examined under a microscope. To estimate the pollen and ovule numbers per flower, one anther from each bud was carefully dissected and all pollen grains were counted; ovaries were carefully dissected out of each flower and counted. Whenever possible, at least 10-15 buds were used in the determination.

Key Results Thirty-three of all the 37 species examined had starchy pollen. Starch was not found in only four species and lipid was not found in only one species; among the four tribes in subfamily Zingiberoideae, all species of Zingibereae and Globbeae had pollen with no starch, Alpineae and Hedychieae had pollen with and without starch, whereas, all species of subfamily Costoideae had starchy pollen with abundant lipids. The mean pollen: ovule ratios in the members of the Zingiberaceae investigated range from 3·25 ± 1·56 to 616·52 ± 117·83.

Conclusions The pollen nutrition types seemed not related to mating systems. The pollen: ovule ratios in members of the Zingiberaceae with the same breeding system are noticeably lower than those recorded by previous authors. The lower pollen: ovule ratios in this family are presumed to be related to the highly efficient pollination systems, mediated by pollen which can be quite glutinous and the relatively large stigma area. In most of the Alpinia species the anaflexistylous flowers have much larger numbers of pollen grains and higher pollen: ovule ratios than the cataflexistylous flowers. There are significant differences in mean pollen grain numbers and pollen: ovule ratios between different life forms but ovule numbers are approximately the same.

Keywords: Zingiberaceae, pollen, starch, lipid, pollen-ovule ratio, breeding system.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.