AOBPreview published online on May 13, 2005
Annals of Botany, doi:10.1093/aob/mci155
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Section of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA
* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Aims To outline the current state of knowledge and discuss the evolution of various viewpoints put forth to explain the mechanism of cellulose biosynthesis. Scope Understanding the mechanism of cellulose biosynthesis is one of the major challenges in plant biology. The simplicity in the chemical structure of cellulose belies the complexities that are associated with the synthesis and assembly of this polysaccharide. Assembly of cellulose microfibrils in most organisms is visualized as a multi-step process involving a number of proteins with the key protein being the cellulose synthase catalytic sub-unit. Although genes encoding this protein have been identified in almost all cellulose synthesizing organisms, it has been a challenge in general, and more specifically in vascular plants, to demonstrate cellulose synthase activity in vitro. The assembly of glucan chains into cellulose microfibrils of specific dimensions, viewed as a spontaneous process, necessitates the assembly of synthesizing sites unique to most groups of organisms. The steps of polymerization (requiring the specific arrangement and activity of the cellulose synthase catalytic sub-units) and crystallization (directed self-assembly of glucan chains) are certainly interlinked in the formation of cellulose microfibrils. Mutants affected in cellulose biosynthesis have been identified in vascular plants. Studies on these mutants and herbicide-treated plants suggest an interesting link between the steps of polymerization and crystallization during cellulose biosynthesis. Conclusions With the identification of a large number of genes encoding cellulose synthases and cellulose synthase-like proteins in vascular plants and the supposed role of a number of other proteins in cellulose biosynthesis, a complete understanding of this process will necessitate a wider variety of research tools and approaches than was thought to be required a few years back.
Received January 18, 2005
Revised March 15, 2005
Accepted March 25, 2005
Invited Review
Cellulose Biosynthesis: Current Views and Evolving Concepts
R. MALCOLM BROWN JR, E-mail: rmbrown{at}mail.utexas.edu
![]()
Abstract ![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
I. I. Atanassov, J. K. Pittman, and S. R. Turner Elucidating the Mechanisms of Assembly and Subunit Interaction of the Cellulose Synthase Complex of Arabidopsis Secondary Cell Walls J. Biol. Chem., February 6, 2009; 284(6): 3833 - 3841. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Xu, K. F. Chater, Z. Deng, and M. Tao A Cellulose Synthase-Like Protein Involved in Hyphal Tip Growth and Morphological Differentiation in Streptomyces J. Bacteriol., July 15, 2008; 190(14): 4971 - 4978. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Lorenzo-Morales, J. Kliescikova, E. Martinez-Carretero, L. M. De Pablos, B. Profotova, E. Nohynkova, A. Osuna, and B. Valladares Glycogen Phosphorylase in Acanthamoeba spp.: Determining the Role of the Enzyme during the Encystment Process Using RNA Interference Eukaryot. Cell, March 1, 2008; 7(3): 509 - 517. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. S. Dhugga Maize Biomass Yield and Composition for Biofuels Crop Sci., November 7, 2007; 47(6): 2211 - 2227. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. B. Sticklen Feedstock Crop Genetic Engineering for Alcohol Fuels Crop Sci., November 7, 2007; 47(6): 2238 - 2248. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||



