Skip Navigation



AOBPreview published online on February 14, 2006
Annals of Botany, doi:10.1093/aob/mcl011
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
97/4/505    most recent
mcl011v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McLETCHIE, D. N.
Right arrow Articles by STARK, L. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McLETCHIE, D. N.
Right arrow Articles by STARK, L. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by McLETCHIE, D. N.
Right arrow Articles by STARK, L. R.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
Received September 7, 2005
Revised November 8, 2005
Accepted December 21, 2005

Article

Sporophyte and Gametophyte Generations Differ in their Thermotolerance Response in the Moss Microbryum

D. NICHOLAS McLETCHIE 1 and LLOYD R. STARK 2 *

1 Department of Biology, 101 Morgan Building, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506-0225, USA
2 Department of Biological Sciences, University of Nevada, 4505 Maryland Parkway, Las Vegas, NV 89154-4004, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
LLOYD R. STARK, E-mail: lrs{at}unlv.nevada.edu


  Abstract

• Background and Aims Actively growing post-embryonic sporophytes of desert mosses are restricted to the cooler, wetter months. However, most desert mosses have perennial gametophytes. It is hypothesized that these life history patterns are due in part to a reduced thermotolerance for sporophytes relative to gametophytes.

• Methods Gametophytes with attached embryonic sporophytes of Microbryum starckeanum were exposed whilst desiccated to thermal episodes of 35 °C (1 hr), 55 °C (1 hr), 75 °C (1 hr) and 75 °C (3 hr), then moistened and allowed to recover for 35 d in a growth chamber.

• Key Results All of the gametophytes survived the thermal exposures and produced protonemata, with the majority also producing shoot buds. Symptoms of gametophytic stress (leaf burning and discoloration of entire shoots) were present in lower frequencies in the 55 °C exposure. Sporophyte resumption of growth and maturation to meiosis were significantly negatively affected by thermal treatment. Not a single sporophyte exposed to the two higher thermal treatments (75 °C for 1 h and 75 °C for 3 h) survived to meiosis, and those sporophytes exposed to 75 °C that survived to the post-embryonic phenophase took significantly longer to reach this phase. Furthermore, among the thermal treatments where some capsules reached maturity (35 °C and 55 °C), maternal shoots that produced a meiotic capsule took longer to regenerate through protonemata than maternal shoots aborting their sporophyte, suggestive of a resource trade-off between generations.

• Conclusions Either (1) the inherent sporophyte thermotolerance is quite low even in this desert moss, and/or (2) a gametophytic thermal stress response controls sporophyte viability.

Keywords: Bryophyte, thermal stress, regeneration, sporophyte, gametophyte, protonema, Microbryum starckeanum.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
L. R. Stark, M. J. Oliver, B. D. Mishler, and D. N. McLetchie
Generational Differences in Response to Desiccation Stress in the Desert Moss Tortula inermis
Ann. Bot., January 1, 2007; 99(1): 53 - 60.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.