Skip Navigation



AOBPreview published online on April 18, 2006

Annals of Botany, doi:10.1093/aob/mcl068
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
97/6/985    most recent
mcl068v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BALSAMO, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by FARRANT, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by BALSAMO, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by FARRANT, J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by BALSAMO, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by FARRANT, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
Received December 12, 2003
Revised March 1, 2004
Accepted January 20, 2006

Article

Drought Tolerance of Selected Eragrostis Species Correlates with Leaf Tensile Properties

R. A. BALSAMO 1 *, C. VANDER WILLIGEN 2, A. M. BAUER 1, and J. FARRANT 2

1 Department of Biology, Villanova University, Villanova, PA 19085, USA
2 Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Cape Town, Private Bag 7701 Rondebosch, South Africa

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
R. A. BALSAMO, E-mail: ronald.balsamo{at}villanova.edu


  Abstract

Background and Aims Previous studies on grass leaf tensile properties (behaviour during mechanical stress) have focused on agricultural applications such as resistance to trampling and palatability; no investigations have directly addressed mechanical properties during water stress, and hence these are the subject of this study.

Methods Critical (lethal) relative water contents were determined for three species of grass in the genus Eragrostis varying in their tolerance to drought. Measurements were taken for leaf tensile strength, elastic modulus, toughness and failure load under different conditions of hydration, and light microscopy and histochemical analyses were undertaken.

Key Results Leaf tensile strength of fully hydrated leaves for the drought-intolerant E. capensis, the moderately drought-tolerant E. tef and the drought-tolerant E. curvula correlated well with drought tolerance (critical relative water content). Eragrostis curvula had higher tensile strength values than E. tef, which in turn had higher values than E. capensis. Measurements on the drought-tolerant grass E. curvula when fully hydrated and when dried to below its turgor loss point showed that tensile strength, toughness and the elastic modulus all increased under conditions of turgor loss, while the failure load remained unchanged. Additional tests of 100 mm segments along the lamina of E. curvula showed that tensile strength, toughness and the elastic modulus all decreased with distance from the base of the lamina, while again the failure load was unaffected. This decrease in mechanical parameters correlated with a reduction in the size of the vascular bundles and the amount of lignification, as viewed in lamina cross-sections.

Conclusions The results confirm that leaf mechanical properties are affected by both water status and position along the lamina, and suggest a positive correlation between leaf internal architecture, tensile strength, cell wall chemistry and tolerance to dehydration for grasses.

Keywords: Biomechanics, drought, Eragrostis, lignification, tensile strength, water stress.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.