Skip Navigation



AOBPreview published online on December 7, 2006

Annals of Botany, doi:10.1093/aob/mcl246
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Content Select
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
99/1/75    most recent
mcl246v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Proctor, M. C. F.
Right arrow Articles by Duckett, J. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Proctor, M. C. F.
Right arrow Articles by Duckett, J. G.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Proctor, M. C. F.
Right arrow Articles by Duckett, J. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Desiccation Tolerance in the Moss Polytrichum formosum: Physiological and Fine-structural Changes during Desiccation and Recovery

Michael C. F. Proctor1, Roberto Ligrone2 and Jeffrey G. Duckett3,*

1 School of Biological Sciences, University of Exeter, Geoffrey Pope Building, Stocker Road, Exeter EX4 4QD, UK
2 Dipartimento di Scienze ambientali, Seconda Università di Napoli, via A. Vivaldi 43, 81100 Caserta, Italy
3 School of Biological Sciences, Queen Mary and Westfield College, University of London, Mile End Road,London E1 4NS, UK

* For correspondence. E-mail j.g.duckett{at}qmul.ac.uk

Received: 12 May 2006    Returned for revision: 8 August 2006    Accepted: 9 October 2006   

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: This study explores basic physiological features and time relations of recovery of photosynthetic activity and CO2 uptake following rehydration of a desiccation-tolerant moss in relation to the full temporal sequence of cytological changes associated with recovery to the normal hydrated state. It seeks reconciliation of the apparently conflicting published physiological and cytological evidence on recovery from desiccation in bryophytes.

METHODS: Observations were made of water-stress responses and recovery using infrared gas analysis and modulated chlorophyll fluorescence, and of structural and ultrastructural changes by light and transmission electron microscopy.

KEY RESULTS: Net CO2 uptake fell to zero at approx. 40 % RWC, paralleling the fluorescence parameter {Phi}PSII at 200 µmol m–2 s–1 PPFD. On re-wetting the moss after 9–18 d desiccation, the initially negative net CO2 uptake became positive 10–30 min after re-wetting, restoring a net carbon balance after approx. 0·3–1 h. The parameter Fv/Fm reached approx. 80 % of its pre-desiccation value within approx. 10 min of re-wetting. In the presence of the protein-synthesis inhibitors chloramphenicol and cycloheximide, recovery of Fv/Fm (and CO2 exchange) proceeded normally in the dark, but declined rapidly in the light. Though initial recovery was rapid, both net CO2 uptake and Fv/Fm required approx. 24 h to recover completely to pre-desiccation values. The fixation protocols produced neither swelling of tissues nor plasmolysis. Thylakoids, grana and mitochondrial cristae remained intact throughout the drying–re-wetting cycle, but there were striking changes in the form of the organelles, especially the chloroplasts, which had prominent lobes and lamellar extensions in the normally hydrated state, but rounded off when desiccated, returning slowly to their normal state within approx. 24 h of re-wetting. Sub-cellular events during desiccation and re-wetting were generally similar to those seen in published data from the pteridophyte Selaginella lepidophylla.

CONCLUSIONS: Initial recovery of respiration and photosynthesis (as of protein synthesis) is very rapid, and independent of protein synthesis, suggesting physical reactivation of systems conserved intact through desiccation and rehydration, but full recovery takes approx. 24 h. This is consistent with the cytological evidence, which shows the thylakoids and cristae remaining intact through the whole course of dehydration and rehydration. Substantial and co-ordinated changes in other cell components, which must affect spatial relationships of organelles and metabolic systems, return to normal on a time span similar to full recovery of photosynthesis. Comparison of the present data with recently published results suggests a significant role for the cytoskeleton in desiccation responses.

Key words: Bryophyta, chlorophyll fluorescence, chloroplasts, CO2 exchange desiccation tolerance, electron microscopy, metabolic inhibitors, mosses, Polytrichum formosum


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Plant Cell PhysiolHome page
S.-y. Fukuda, R. Yamakawa, M. Hirai, Y. Kashino, H. Koike, and K. Satoh
Mechanisms to Avoid Photoinhibition in a Desiccation-Tolerant Cyanobacterium, Nostoc commune
Plant Cell Physiol., March 1, 2008; 49(3): 488 - 492.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
T. Hajek and R. P. Beckett
Effect of Water Content Components on Desiccation and Recovery in Sphagnum Mosses
Ann. Bot., January 1, 2008; 101(1): 165 - 173.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
J. K. Rowntree, J. G. Duckett, C. L. Mortimer, M. M. Ramsay, and S. Pressel
Formation of Specialized Propagules Resistant to Desiccation and Cryopreservation in the Threatened Moss Ditrichum plumbicola (Ditrichales, Bryopsida)
Ann. Bot., September 1, 2007; 100(3): 483 - 496.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.