Skip Navigation



AOBPreview published online on April 11, 2007

Annals of Botany, doi:10.1093/aob/mcm041
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
100/3/631    most recent
mcm041v2
mcm041v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Damerval, C.
Right arrow Articles by Nadot, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Damerval, C.
Right arrow Articles by Nadot, S.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Damerval, C.
Right arrow Articles by Nadot, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Evolution of Perianth and Stamen Characteristics with Respect to Floral Symmetry in Ranunculales

Catherine Damerval1,* and Sophie Nadot2

1 CNRS UMR Génétique Végétale, INRA, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Sud, Gif-sur-Yvette, F-91190, France
2 Université Paris-Sud, Laboratoire Ecologie, Systématique, Evolution, CNRS UMR 8079, AgroParisTech, Orsay, F-91405, France

* For correspondence. E-mail: damerval{at}moulon.inra.fr

Received: 30 November 2006    Returned for revision: 10 January 2007    Accepted: 30 January 2007   

Background and Aims: Floral symmetry presents two main states in angiosperms, namely polysymmetry and monosymmetry. Monosymmetry is thought to have evolved several times independently from polysymmetry, possibly in co-adaptation with specialized pollinators. Monosymmetry commonly refers to the perianth, even though associated androecium modifications have been reported. The evolution of perianth symmetry is examined with respect to traits of flower architecture in the Ranunculales, the sister group to all other eudicots, which present a large diversity of floral forms.

Methods: Characters considered were perianth merism, calyx, corolla and androecium symmetry, number of stamens and spurs. Character evolution was optimized on a composite phylogenetic tree of Ranunculales using maximum parsimony.

Key Results: The ancestral state for merism could not be inferred because the basalmost Eupteleaceae lack a perianth and have a variable number of stamens. The Papaveraceae are dimerous, and the five other families share a common trimerous ancestor. Shifts from trimery to dimery (or reverse) are observed. Pentamery evolved in Ranunculaceae. Ranunculales except Eupteleaceae, present a polysymmetric ancestral state. Monosymmetry evolved once within Papaveraceae, Ranunculaceae and Menispermaceae (female flowers only). Oligandry is the ancestral state for all Ranunculales, and polyandry evolved several times independently, in Papaveraceae, Menispermaceae, Berberidaceae and Ranunculaceae, with two reversions to oligandry in the latter. The ancestral state for androecium symmetry is ambiguous for the Ranunculales, while polysymmetry evolved immediately after the divergence of Eupteleaceae. A disymmetric androecium evolved in Papaveraceae. The ancestral state for spurs is none. Multiple spurs evolved in Papaveraceae, Berberidaceae and Ranunculaceae, and single spurs occur in Papaveraceae and Ranunculaceae.

Conclusions: The evolution of symmetry appears disconnected from changes in merism and stamen number, although monosymmetry never evolved in the context of an open ground plan. In bisexual species, monosymmetry evolved coincidently with single spurs, allowing us to propose an evolutionary scenario for Papaveraceae.

Key words: Floral symmetry, Ranunculales, perianth, androecium, stamen, spur, merism, evo-devo


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
F. Jabbour, C. Damerval, and S. Nadot
Evolutionary Trends in the Flowers of Asteridae: Is Polyandry an Alternative to Zygomorphy?
Ann. Bot., August 1, 2008; 102(2): 153 - 165.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
Compiled by, F. Tooke, T. Chiurugwi, and N. Battey
Flowering Newsletter bibliography for 2007
J. Exp. Bot., July 18, 2008; (2008) ern109v1.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
C. P. Scutt, G. Theissen, and C. Ferrandiz
The Evolution of Plant Development: Past, Present and Future: Preface
Ann. Bot., September 1, 2007; 100(3): 599 - 601.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.