AOBPreview published online on March 20, 2009
Annals of Botany, doi:10.1093/aob/mcp056
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Realized tolerance to nectar robbing: compensation to floral enemies in Ipomopsis aggregata
Biology Department, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, USA
* E-mail Rebecca.Irwin{at}Dartmouth.edu
Received: 21 September 2008 Returned for revision: 20 November 2008 Accepted: 27 January 2009
Background and Aims: Although the ecological and evolutionary consequences of foliar herbivory are well understood, how plants cope with floral damage is less well explored. Here the concept of tolerance, typically studied within the context of plant defence to foliar herbivores and pathogens, is extended to floral damage. Variation in tolerance to floral damage is examined, together with some of the mechanisms involved.
Methods: The study was conducted on Ipomopsis aggregata, which experiences floral damage and nectar removal by nectar-robbing bees. High levels of robbing can reduce seeds sired and produced by up to 50 %, an indirect effect mediated through pollinator avoidance of robbed plants. Using an experimental common garden with groups of I. aggregata, realized tolerance to robbing was measured. Realized tolerance included both genetic and environmental components of tolerance. It was hypothesized that both resource acquisition and storage traits, and traits involved in pollination would mitigate the negative effects of robbers.
Key Results: Groups of I. aggregata varied in their ability to tolerate nectar robbing. Realized tolerance was observed only through a component of male plant reproduction (pollen donation) and not through components of female plant reproduction. Some groups fully compensated for robbing while others under- or overcompensated. Evidence was found only for a pollination-related trait, flower production, associated with realized tolerance. Plants that produced more flowers and that had a higher inducibility of flower production following robbing were more able to compensate through male function.
Conclusions: Variation in realized tolerance to nectar robbing was found in I. aggregata, but only through an estimate of male reproduction, and traits associated with pollination may confer realized tolerance to robbing. By linking concepts and techniques from studies of plant–pollinator and plant–herbivore interactions, this work provides insight into the role of floral traits in pollinator attraction as well as plant defence.
Key words: Compensation, herbivory, indirect effects, Ipomopsis aggregata, male reproductive success, nectar robbing, pollen donation, pollination, resistance, tolerance
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  R. J. Mitchell, R. E. Irwin, R. J. Flanagan, and J. D. Karron Ecology and evolution of plant-pollinator interactions Ann. Bot., June 1, 2009; 103(9): 1355 - 1363. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|