Skip Navigation



AOBPreview published online on April 7, 2009

Annals of Botany, doi:10.1093/aob/mcp081
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow ContentSelect
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
103/8/1347    most recent
mcp081v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hanley, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Sykes, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hanley, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Sykes, R. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Hanley, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Sykes, R. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Impacts of seedling herbivory on plant competition and implications for species coexistence

M. E. Hanley1,* and R. J. Sykes2

1 School of Biological Sciences, University of Plymouth, Drake Circus, Plymouth PL4 8AA, UK
2 School of Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Bassett Crescent East, Southampton SO16 7PX, UK

* For correspondence. E-mail mehanley{at}plymouth.ac.uk

Received: 16 December 2008    Returned for revision: 16 February 2009    Accepted: 6 March 2009   

Background and Aims: Although the causes and consequences of seedling herbivory for plant community composition are well understood, the mechanisms by which herbivores influence plant species recruitment to the established phase remain less clear. The aim was to examine how variation in the intensity of seedling herbivory interacts with growth-defence trade-offs and herbivore feeding preferences to affect plant community development.

Methods: Using 14-d-old seedlings of Trifolium pratense and T. repens, relative growth and susceptibility to herbivory by the snail Helix aspersa was quantified to elucidate putative growth-defence trade-offs for these species. Then mixed assemblages of 14-d-old Trifolium seedlings were exposed to herbivory by zero, two, five or ten snails and determined how variation in the intensity of herbivory affected competitive interactions into the mature phase (as measured by total plant biomass at 120 d old).

Key Results: In the absence of herbivory, communities were dominated by T. pratense; a result expected on the basis that it yielded larger and presumably more competitive seedlings. However, when seedlings were exposed to herbivory, the balance of competition shifted. At low levels of herbivory (two snails), both Trifolium species contributed equally to total plant biomass. More intense herbivory (five snails) resulted in almost total mortality of T. pratense and dominance of the mature community by T. repens. The most intense herbivory (ten snails) effectively removed all seedlings from the experimental community.

Conclusions: The study illustrates a mechanism whereby spatio-temporal fluctuations in seedling herbivory, when coupled with species-specific variation in competitive ability and sensitivity to herbivore attack, can differentially influence plant recruitment into the mature phase. This mechanism may be a key element in our attempts to understand plant species coexistence, since fluctuations in plant recruitment are fundamental to the many theories that view coexistence as a consequence of a spatio-temporal lottery for dominance over regeneration micro-sites.

Key words: Growth-defence trade-off, lottery models, plant–animal interactions, plant size variability, seedling acceptability, seedling defence, spatio-temporal niches, Trifolium pratense, Trifolium repens


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.