Skip Navigation



AOBPreview published online on May 15, 2009

Annals of Botany, doi:10.1093/aob/mcp108
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow ContentSelect
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
104/1/179    most recent
mcp108v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Llorens, L.
Right arrow Articles by Beerling, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Llorens, L.
Right arrow Articles by Beerling, D. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Llorens, L.
Right arrow Articles by Beerling, D. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Water-use responses of ‘living fossil’ conifers to CO2 enrichment in a simulated Cretaceous polar environment

Laura Llorens*, Colin P. Osborne and David J. Beerling

Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK

* For correspondence. Present address: Department of Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Sciences, University of Girona, Campus Montilivi, E-17071, Girona, Spain. E-mail laura.llorens{at}udg.edu

Received: 12 December 2008    Returned for revision: 3 March 2009    Accepted: 31 March 2009   

Background and Aims: During the Mesozoic, the polar regions supported coniferous forests that experienced warm climates, a CO2-rich atmosphere and extreme seasonal variations in daylight. How the interaction between the last two factors might have influenced water use of these conifers was investigated. An experimental approach was used to test the following hypotheses: (1) the expected beneficial effects of elevated [CO2] on water-use efficiency (WUE) are reduced or lost during the 24-h light of the high-latitude summer; and (2) elevated [CO2] reduces plant water use over the growing season.

Methods: Measurements of leaf and whole-plant gas exchange, and leaf-stable carbon isotope composition were made on one evergreen (Sequoia sempervirens) and two deciduous (Metasequoia glyptostroboides and Taxodium distichum) ‘living fossil’ coniferous species after 3 years' growth in controlled-environment simulated Cretaceous Arctic (69°N) conditions at either ambient (400 µmol mol–1) or elevated (800 µmol mol–1) [CO2].

Key Results: Stimulation of whole-plant WUE (WUEP) by CO2 enrichment was maintained over the growing season for the three studied species but this pattern was not reflected in patterns of WUE inferred from leaf-scale gas exchange measurements (iWUEL) and {delta}13C of foliage (tWUEL). This response was driven largely by increased rates of carbon uptake, because there was no overall CO2 effect on daily whole-plant transpiration or whole-plant water loss integrated over the study period. Seasonal patterns of tWUEL differed from those measured for iWUEL. The results suggest caution against over simplistic interpretations of WUEP based on leaf isotopic composition.

Conclusions: The data suggest that the efficiency of whole-tree water use may be improved by CO2 enrichment in a simulated high-latitude environment, but that transpiration is relatively insensitive to atmospheric CO2 in the living fossil species investigated.

Key words: Water-use efficiency, elevated CO2, living fossil plants, conifers, paleoecology, ancient polar forests, stable carbon isotopes, stomatal conductance, canopy transpiration


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.