<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org">
<title>Annals of Botany - recent issues</title>
<link>http://aob.oxfordjournals.org</link>
<description>Annals of Botany - RSS feed of recent issues (covers the latest 3 issues, including the current issue) </description>
<prism:eIssn>1095-8290</prism:eIssn>
<prism:publicationName>Annals of Botany</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>0305-7364</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/104/1/i?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/104/1/iii?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/104/1/ix?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/104/1/v?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/104/1/vi?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/104/1/vi-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/104/1/vii?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/104/1/viii?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/104/1/1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/104/1/9?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/104/1/19?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/104/1/33?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/104/1/41?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/104/1/57?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/104/1/71?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/104/1/81?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/104/1/91?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/104/1/115?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/104/1/125?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/104/1/143?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/104/1/161?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/104/1/179?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/104/1/189?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/9/i?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/9/1355?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/9/1365?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/9/1379?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/9/1385?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/9/1395?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/9/1403?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/9/1415?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/9/1425?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/9/1435?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/9/1445?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/9/1459?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/9/1471?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/9/1481?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/9/1489?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/9/1501?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/9/1515?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/9/1529?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/9/1547?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/9/1557?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/9/1567?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/9/1579?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/9/1589?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/8/i?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/8/v?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/8/vii?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/8/viii?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/8/1165?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/8/1173?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/8/1187?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/8/1207?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/8/1219?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/8/1227?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/8/1239?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/8/1249?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/8/1261?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/8/1271?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/8/1279?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/8/1291?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/8/1303?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/8/1315?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/8/1325?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/8/1337?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/8/1347?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
</channel>

<item rdf:about="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/104/1/i?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ContentSnapshots]]></title>
<link>http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/104/1/i?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-16</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/aob/mcp143</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ContentSnapshots]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>104</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>ii</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>i</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>ContentSnapshots</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/104/1/iii?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[John Bryant takes a closer look at some of this month's Original Articles]]></title>
<link>http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/104/1/iii?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bryant, J. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-16</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/aob/mcp145</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[John Bryant takes a closer look at some of this month's Original Articles]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>104</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>iv</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>iii</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>ContentSelect</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/104/1/ix?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Molecular breeding of forage and turf]]></title>
<link>http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/104/1/ix?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Byrne, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-16</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/aob/mcp113</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Molecular breeding of forage and turf]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>104</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>x</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>ix</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>BOOK REVIEWS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/104/1/v?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Annals of Botany Graduate Prize Winner]]></title>
<link>http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/104/1/v?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-16</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/aob/mcp146</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Annals of Botany Graduate Prize Winner]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>104</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>v</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>v</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Graduate Prize Winner</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/104/1/vi?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Bryophyte biology, 2nd edn]]></title>
<link>http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/104/1/vi?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheffield, L., Rowntree, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-16</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/aob/mcp109</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Bryophyte biology, 2nd edn]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>104</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>vi</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>vi</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>BOOK REVIEWS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/104/1/vi-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The illustrated moss flora of Antarctica]]></title>
<link>http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/104/1/vi-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pressel, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-16</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/aob/mcp111</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The illustrated moss flora of Antarctica]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>104</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>vii</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>vi</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>BOOK REVIEWS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/104/1/vii?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Tropical forest community ecology]]></title>
<link>http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/104/1/vii?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Baker, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-16</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/aob/mcp110</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Tropical forest community ecology]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>104</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>viii</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>vii</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>BOOK REVIEWS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/104/1/viii?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Teaching plant anatomy through creative laboratory exercises]]></title>
<link>http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/104/1/viii?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chaffey, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-16</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/aob/mcp112</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Teaching plant anatomy through creative laboratory exercises]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>104</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>ix</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>viii</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>BOOK REVIEWS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/104/1/1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Sucrose-mediated translational control]]></title>
<link>http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/104/1/1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Environmental factors greatly impact plant gene expression and concentrations of cellular metabolites such as sugars and amino acids. The changed metabolite concentrations affect the expression of many genes both transcriptionally and post-transcriptionally.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Recent Progress</st>
<p>Sucrose acts as a signalling molecule in the control of translation of the S1 class basic leucine zipper transcription factor (bZIP) genes. In these genes the main bZIP open reading frames (ORFs) are preceded by upstream open reading frames (uORFs). The presence of uORFs generally inhibits translation of the following ORF but can also be instrumental in specific translational control. <I>bZIP11</I>, a member of the S1 class <I>bZIP</I> genes, harbours four uORFs of which uORF2 is required for translational control in response to sucrose concentrations. This uORF encodes the Sucrose Control peptide (SC-peptide), which is evolutionarily conserved among all S1 class <I>bZIP</I> genes in different plant species. <I>Arabidopsis thaliana bZIP11</I> and related <I>bZIP</I> genes seem to be important regulators of metabolism. These proteins are targets of the Snf1-related protein kinase 1 (SnRK1) KIN10 and KIN11, which are responsive to energy deprivation as well as to various stresses. In response to energy deprivation, ribosomal biogenesis is repressed to preserve cellular function and maintenance. Other key regulators of ribosomal biogenesis such as the protein kinase Target of Rapamycin (TOR) are tightly regulated in response to stress.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Plants use translational control of gene expression to optimize growth and development in response to stress as well as to energy deprivation. This Botanical Briefing discusses the role of sucrose signalling in the translational control of bZIP11 and the regulation of ribosomal biogenesis in response to metabolic changes and stress conditions.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hummel, M., Rahmani, F., Smeekens, S., Hanson, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-16</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/aob/mcp086</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Sucrose-mediated translational control]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>104</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>7</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>BOTANICAL BRIEFING</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/104/1/9?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Differential regulatory role of nitric oxide in mediating nitrate reductase activity in roots of tomato (Solanum lycocarpum)]]></title>
<link>http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/104/1/9?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background and Aims</st>
<p>Nitric oxide (NO) has been demonstrated to stimulate the activity of nitrate reductase (NR) in plant roots supplied with a low level of nitrate, and to affect proteins differently, depending on the ratio of NO to the level of protein. Nitrate has been suggested to regulate the level of NO in plants. This present study examined interactive effects of NO and nitrate level on NR activity in roots of tomato (<I>Solanum lycocarpum</I>).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>NR activity, mRNA level of NR gene and concentration of NR protein in roots fed with 0&middot;5 m<scp>m</scp> or 5 m<scp>m</scp> nitrate and treated with the NO donors, sodium nitroprusside (SNP) and diethylamine NONOate sodium (NONOate), and the NO scavenger, 2-(4-carboxyphenyl)-4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-imidazoline-1-oxyl-3-oxide (cPTIO), were measured in 25-d-old seedlings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Key Results</st>
<p>Addition of SNP and NONOate enhanced but cPTIO decreased NR activity in the roots fed with 0&middot;5 m<scp>m</scp> nitrate. The opposite was true for the roots fed with 5 m<scp>m</scp> nitrate. However, the mRNA level of the NR gene and the protein concentration of NR enzyme in the roots were not affected by SNP treatment, irrespective of nitrate pre-treatment. Nevertheless, a low rate of NO gas increased while cPTIO decreased the NR activities of the enzyme extracts from the roots at both nitrate levels. Increasing the rate of NO gas further increased NR activity in the enzyme extracts of the roots fed with 0&middot;5 m<scp>m</scp> nitrate but decreased it when 5 m<scp>m</scp> nitrate was supplied. Interestingly, the stimulative effect of NO gas on NR activity could be reversed by NO removal through N<SUB>2</SUB> flushing in the enzyme extracts from the roots fed with 0&middot;5 m<scp>m</scp> nitrate but not from those with 5 m<scp>m</scp> nitrate.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The effects of NO on NR activity in tomato roots depend on levels of nitrate supply, and probably result from direct interactions between NO and NR protein.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jin, C. W., Du, S. T., Zhang, Y. S., Lin, X. Y., Tang, C. X.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-16</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/aob/mcp087</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Differential regulatory role of nitric oxide in mediating nitrate reductase activity in roots of tomato (Solanum lycocarpum)]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>104</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>17</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>9</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>ORIGINAL ARTICLES</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/104/1/19?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Different genome-specific chromosome stabilities in synthetic Brassica allohexaploids revealed by wide crosses with Orychophragmus]]></title>
<link>http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/104/1/19?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background and Aims</st>
<p>In sexual hybrids between cultivated <I>Brassica</I> species and another crucifer, <I>Orychophragmus violaceus</I> (2<I>n</I> = 24), parental genome separation during mitosis and meiosis is under genetic control but this phenomenon varies depending upon the <I>Brassica</I> species. To further investigate the mechanisms involved in parental genome separation, complex hybrids between synthetic <I>Brassica</I> allohexaploids (2<I>n</I> = 54, AABBCC) from three sources and <I>O. violaceus</I> were obtained and characterized.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Genomic <I>in situ</I> hybridization, amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) and single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) were used to explore chromosomal/genomic components and rRNA gene expression of the complex hybrids and their progenies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Key Results</st>
<p>Complex hybrids with variable fertility exhibited phenotypes that were different from the female allohexaploids and expressed some traits from <I>O. violaceus</I>. These hybrids were mixoploids (2<I>n</I> = 34&ndash;46) and retained partial complements of allohexaploids, including whole chromosomes of the A and B genomes and some of the C genome but no intact <I>O. violaceus</I> chromosomes; AFLP bands specific for <I>O. violaceus</I>, novel for two parents and absent in hexaploids were detected. The complex hybrids produced progenies with chromosomes/genomic complements biased to <I>B. juncea</I> (2<I>n</I> = 36, AABB) and novel <I>B. juncea</I> lines with two genomes of different origins. The expression of rRNA genes from <I>B. nigra</I> was revealed in all allohexaploids and complex hybrids, showing that the hierarchy of nucleolar dominance (<I>B. nigra</I>, BB &gt; <I>B. rapa</I>, AA &gt; <I>B. oleracea</I>, CC) in <I>Brassica</I> allotetraploids was still valid in these plants.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The chromosomes of three genomes in these synthetic <I>Brassica</I> allohexaploids showed different genome-specific stabilities (B &gt; A &gt; C) under induction of alien chromosome elimination in crosses with <I>O. violaceus</I>, which was possibly affected by nucleolar dominance.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ge, X.-H., Wang, J., Li, Z.-Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-16</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/aob/mcp099</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Different genome-specific chromosome stabilities in synthetic Brassica allohexaploids revealed by wide crosses with Orychophragmus]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>104</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>31</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>19</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>ORIGINAL ARTICLES</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/104/1/33?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Differential effects of nectar robbing by the same bumble-bee species on three sympatric Corydalis species with varied mating systems]]></title>
<link>http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/104/1/33?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background and Aims</st>
<p>Most research on the widespread phenomenon of nectar robbing has focused on the effect of the nectar robbers' behaviour on host-plant fitness. However, attention also needs be paid to the characteristics of host plants, which can potentially influence the consequences of nectar robbing as well. A system of three sympatric <I>Corydalis</I> species sharing the same nectar-robbing bumble-bee was therefore studied over 3 years in order to investigate the effect of nectar robbing on host reproductive fitness.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Three perennial species of <I>Corydalis</I> were studied in the Shennongjia Mountain area, central China. Observations were conducted on visitor behaviour and visitation frequencies of nectar-robbers and legitimate pollinators.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Key Results</st>
<p>The results indicated that the effect of nectar robbing by <I>Bombus pyrosoma</I> varied among species, and the three species had different mating systems. Seed set was thus influenced differentially: there was no effect on seed set of the predominantly selfing <I>C. tomentella</I>; for the facultative outcrossing <I>C. incisa</I>, nectar robbing by <I>B. pyrosoma</I> had a positive effect; and nectar robbing had a significant negative effect on the seed set of outcrossing <I>C. ternatifolia</I>.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>A hypothesis is proposed that the type of host-plant mating system could influence the consequences of nectar robbing on host reproductive fitness.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zhang, Y.-W., Yu, Q., Zhao, J.-M., Guo, Y.-H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-16</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/aob/mcp104</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Differential effects of nectar robbing by the same bumble-bee species on three sympatric Corydalis species with varied mating systems]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>104</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>39</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>33</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>ORIGINAL ARTICLES</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/104/1/41?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Pollination syndromes in African Marantaceae]]></title>
<link>http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/104/1/41?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background and Aims</st>
<p>The Marantaceae (550 spp.) is the most derived family in the order Zingiberales and exhibits a complex explosive pollination mechanism. To understand the evolutionary significance of this unique process of pollen transfer, comparative morphological and ecological studies were conducted in Gabon.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>During a total stay of 11 months, 31 species of Marantaceae were investigated at different sites in Gabon. The study included analyses of floral diversity, observations on the pollinator spectrum as well as ecological measurements (e.g. nectar sugar concentration and volume).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Key Results</st>
<p>Analyses reveal five flower types based on flower size and pigmentation, spatial arrangement of the floral tube and presence/absence of nectar guides and conspicuous outer staminodes. Each type is associated with a specific functional pollinator group leading to the description of distinct pollination syndromes. The &lsquo;small (horizontal)&rsquo; flowers are predominantly pollinated by small bees (<I>Thrinchostoma</I> spp., <I>Allodapula ornaticeps</I>), the &lsquo;large (horizontal)&rsquo; and &lsquo;medium-sized (horizontal)&rsquo; flowers by medium-sized bees (<I>Amegilla vivida</I>, <I>Thrinchostoma bicometes</I>), the &lsquo;locked (horizontal)&rsquo; flowers by large bees (<I>Xylocopa nigrita</I>, <I>X. varipes</I>) and the &lsquo;(large) vertical&rsquo; flowers by sunbirds.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The longevity of Marantaceae individuals and the omnipresence of their pollinators allowed the specialization to a given functional pollinator group. Intermediate ecological values, however, make occasional pollinator overlaps possible, indicating potential pathways of pollinator shifts. Similar radiation tendencies observed on other continents hint at similar selective pressures and evolutionary constraints.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ley, A. C., Classen-Bockhoff, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-16</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/aob/mcp106</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Pollination syndromes in African Marantaceae]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>104</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>56</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>41</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>ORIGINAL ARTICLES</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/104/1/57?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Ecological correlates of ex situ seed longevity: a comparative study on 195 species]]></title>
<link>http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/104/1/57?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background and Aims</st>
<p>Extended seed longevity in the dry state is the basis for the <I>ex situ</I> conservation of &lsquo;orthodox&rsquo; seeds. However, even under identical storage conditions there is wide variation in seed life-span between species. Here, the effects of seed traits and environmental conditions at the site of collection on seed longevity is explored for195 wild species from 71 families from environments ranging from cold deserts to tropical forests.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Seeds were rapidly aged at elevated temperature and relative humidity (either 45&deg;C and 60% RH or 60&deg;C and 60% RH) and regularly sampled for germination. The time taken in storage for viability to fall to 50% (<I>p</I><SUB>50</SUB>) was determined using Probit analysis and used as a measure of relative seed longevity between species.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Key Results</st>
<p>Across species, <I>p</I><SUB>50</SUB> at 45&deg;C and 60% RH varied from 0&middot;1 d to 771 d. Endospermic seeds were, in general, shorter lived than non-endospermic seeds and seeds from hot, dry environments were longer lived than those from cool, wet conditions. These relationships remained significant when controlling for the effects of phylogenetic relatedness using phylogenetically independent contrasts. Seed mass and oil content were not correlated with <I>p</I><SUB>50</SUB>.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The data suggest that the endospermic seeds of early angiosperms which evolved in forest understorey habitats are short-lived. Extended longevity presumably evolved as a response to climatic change or the invasion of drier areas. The apparent short-lived nature of endospermic seeds from cool wet environments may have implications for re-collection and re-testing strategies in <I>ex situ</I> conservation.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Probert, R. J., Daws, M. I., Hay, F. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-16</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/aob/mcp082</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Ecological correlates of ex situ seed longevity: a comparative study on 195 species]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>104</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>69</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>57</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>ORIGINAL ARTICLES</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/104/1/71?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Dynamics of distribution and performance of ramets constructing genets: a demographic-genetic study in a clonal plant, Convallaria keiskei]]></title>
<link>http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/104/1/71?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background and Aims</st>
<p>In clonal plants producing vegetative offspring, performance at the genet level as well as at the ramet level should be investigated in order to understand the entire picture of the population dynamics and the life history characteristics. In this study, demography, including reproduction and survival, the growth patterns and the spatial distributions of ramets within genets of the clonal herb <I>Convallaria keiskei</I> were explored.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Vegetative growth, flowering and survival of shoots whose genets were identified using microsatellite markers were monitored in four study plots for 3 years (2003&ndash;2005). The size structures of ramets in genets and their temporal shifts were then analysed. Their spatial distributions were also examined.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Key Results</st>
<p>During the census, 274 and 149 ramets were mapped in two 1 <FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT> 2 m plots, and 83 and 94 ramets in two 2 <FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT> 2 m quadrats. Thirty-eight genotypes were identified from 580 samples. Each plot included 5&ndash;18 genets, and most ramets belonged to the predominant genet(s) in each plot. Shoots foliated yearly for several years, but flowering ramets did not have an inflorescence the next year. A considerable number of new clonal offspring persistently appeared, forming a bell-shaped curve of the size structure of ramets in each genet. Comparing the structures modelled by the normal distributions suggested variation among ramets belonging to a single genet and variation among genets. Furthermore, spatial analyses revealed clumped and distant distributions of ramet pairs in a genet, in which the distant patterns corresponded to the linearly elongating clonal growth pattern of this species.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Characteristics of ramet performances such as flowering and recruitment of clonal offspring, in addition to growth, played a large part in the regulation of genet dynamics and distribution, which were different among the studied genets. These might be characteristics particularly relevant to clonal life histories.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Araki, K., Shimatani, K., Ohara, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-16</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/aob/mcp092</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Dynamics of distribution and performance of ramets constructing genets: a demographic-genetic study in a clonal plant, Convallaria keiskei]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>104</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>79</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>71</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>ORIGINAL ARTICLES</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/104/1/81?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Introgression of apomixis into sexual species is inhibited by mentor effects and ploidy barriers in the Ranunculus auricomus complex]]></title>
<link>http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/104/1/81?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background and Aims</st>
<p>Apomictic plants maintain functional pollen, and via pollination the genetic factors controlling apomixis can be potentially transferred to congeneric sexual populations. In contrast, the sexual individuals do not fertilize apomictic plants which produce seeds without fertilization of the egg cells. This unidirectional introgressive hybridization is expected finally to replace sexuality by apomixis and is thought to be a causal factor for the wide geographical distribution of apomictic complexes. Nevertheless, this process may be inhibited by induced selfing (mentor effects) of otherwise self-incompatible sexual individuals. Here whether mentor effects or actual cross-fertilization takes place between diploid sexual and polyploid apomictic cytotypes in the <I>Ranunculus auricomus</I> complex was tested via experimental crosses.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Diploid sexual mother plants were pollinated with tetra- and hexaploid apomictic pollen donators by hand, and the amount of well-developed seed compared with aborted seed was evaluated. The reproductive pathways were assessed in the well-developed seed via flow cytometric seed screen (FCSS).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Key Results</st>
<p>The majority of seed was aborted; the well-developed seeds have resulted from both mentor effects and cross-fertilization at very low frequencies (1&middot;3 and 1&middot;6 % of achenes, respectively). Pollination by 4<I>x</I> apomictic pollen plants results more frequently in cross-fertilization, whereas pollen from 6<I>x</I> plants more frequently induced mentor effects.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>It is concluded that introgression of apomixis into sexual populations is limited by ploidy barriers in the <I>R. auricomus</I> complex, and to a minor extent by mentor effects. In mixed populations, sexuality cannot be replaced by apomixis because the higher fertility of sexual populations still compensates the low frequencies of potential introgression of apomixis.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Horandl, E., Temsch, E. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-16</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/aob/mcp093</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Introgression of apomixis into sexual species is inhibited by mentor effects and ploidy barriers in the Ranunculus auricomus complex]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>104</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>89</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>81</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>ORIGINAL ARTICLES</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/104/1/91?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Phytoliths in woody plants from the Miombo woodlands of Mozambique]]></title>
<link>http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/104/1/91?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background and Aims</st>
<p>There are no descriptions of phytoliths produced by plants from the &lsquo;Zambezian&rsquo; zone, where Miombo woodlands are the dominant element of the largest single phytochorion in sub-Saharan Africa. The preservation of phytoliths in fossil records of Africa makes phytoliths a tool to study early plant communities. Paleo-ethnobotanical interpretation of phytoliths relies on the comparison of ancient types with morphotypes extracted from living reference collections.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Phytoliths were extracted from plant samples representing 41 families, 77 genera and 90 species through sonic cleaning, dry ashing and acid treatment; and phytoliths thus extracted were quantified. For each species, an average of 216 phytoliths were counted. The percentage of each morphotype identified per species was calculated, and types were described according to the descriptors from the International Code for Phytolith Nomenclature. Phytolith assemblages were subject to discriminant analysis, cluster analysis and principal component analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Key Results</st>
<p>Phytoliths were grouped into 57 morphotypes (two were articulated forms and 55 were discrete shapes), and provide a reference collection of phytolith assemblages produced by Miombo woody species. Common and unique morphotypes are described and taxonomic and grouping variables are looked into from a statistical perspective.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The first quantitative taxonomy of phytoliths from Miombos is presented here, including new types and constituting the most extensive phytolith key for any African ecoregion. Evidence is presented that local woody species are hypervariable silica producers and their phytolith morphotypes are highly polymorphic. The taxonomic significance of these phytoliths is largely poor, but there are important exceptions that include the morphotypes produced by members from &gt;10 families and orders. The typical phytolithic signal that would allow scientists to identify ancient woodlands of &lsquo;Zambezian&rsquo; affiliation comprises only half of the original number of phytoliths originally produced and might favour the more resilient blocky, cylindroid, globular and tabular forms.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mercader, J., Bennett, T., Esselmont, C., Simpson, S., Walde, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-16</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/aob/mcp097</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Phytoliths in woody plants from the Miombo woodlands of Mozambique]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>104</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>113</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>91</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>ORIGINAL ARTICLES</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/104/1/115?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Ageing effects in an iteroparous plant species with a variable life span]]></title>
<link>http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/104/1/115?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background and Aims</st>
<p>Ageing effects may be due to dysfunction leading to decreasing reproduction and survival with age. In plants, however, other (physiological) causes, associated with size for example, may also play a role. Iteroparous plants with genetically variable life spans can be helpful in unravelling these two aspects of changes associated with growing older.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>In a long-term experiment, <I>Beta vulgaris</I> ssp. <I>maritima</I> (sea beet) plants from the same set of populations but with different ages were compared for flowering date over several years. Flowering date, root growth and seed production were measured in a synthetic population and in progenies derived from reciprocal crosses over three consecutive years and analysed with respect to the number of years yet to live. Heritabilities of these three characters and of life span were estimated.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Key Results</st>
<p>Flowering occurred on average 1&middot;3 d later each year over a plant's whole lifetime. In the year before dying, plants flowered on average 3&middot;3 d later and both root investment and seed production decreased significantly compared with plants that remained alive for at least 1 further year. The negative relationship (trade-off) between reproduction and root investment in early life became positive near the end of life, and the positive relationship between flowering date and root growth became negative.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Effects of ageing &ndash; in the sense of a decline in reproduction and root storage &ndash; combined with later flowering were particularly pronounced in the year before death. The gradual change in flowering phenology, observed over the whole lifetime, could have a physiological basis unrelated to dysfunction.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Van Dijk, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-16</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/aob/mcp100</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Ageing effects in an iteroparous plant species with a variable life span]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>104</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>124</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>115</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>ORIGINAL ARTICLES</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/104/1/125?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Molecular systematics of Gagea and Lloydia (Liliaceae; Liliales): implications of analyses of nuclear ribosomal and plastid DNA sequences for infrageneric classification]]></title>
<link>http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/104/1/125?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background and Aims</st>
<p><I>Gagea</I> is a Eurasian genus of petaloid monocots, with a few species in North Africa, comprising between 70 and approximately 275 species depending on the author. <I>Lloydia</I> (thought to be the closest relative of <I>Gagea</I>) consists of 12&ndash;20 species that have a mostly eastern Asian distribution. Delimitation of these genera and their subdivisions are unresolved questions in Liliaceae taxonomy. The objective of this study is to evaluate generic and infrageneric circumscription of <I>Gagea</I> and <I>Lloydia</I> using DNA sequence data.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A phylogenetic study of <I>Gagea</I> and <I>Lloydia</I> (Liliaceae) was conducted using sequences of nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) and plastid (<I>rpl16</I> intron, <I>trnL</I> intron, <I>trnL-F</I> spacer, <I>matK</I> and the <I>psbA</I>-<I>trnH</I> spacer) DNA regions. This included 149 accessions (seven as outgroups), with multiple accessions of some taxa; 552 sequences were included, of which 393 were generated as part of this research.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Key Results</st>
<p>A close relationship of <I>Gagea</I> and <I>Lloydia</I> was confirmed in analyses using different datasets, but neither <I>Gagea</I> nor <I>Lloydia</I> forms a monophyletic group as currently circumscribed; however, the ITS and plastid analyses did not produce congruent results for the placement of <I>Lloydia</I> relative to the major groups within <I>Gagea. Gagea</I> accessions formed five moderately to strongly supported clades in all trees, with most <I>Lloydia</I> taxa positioned at the basal nodes; in the strict consensus trees from the combined data a basal polytomy occurs. There is limited congruence between the classical, morphology-derived infrageneric taxonomy in <I>Gagea</I> (including <I>Lloydia</I>) and clades in the present phylogenetic analyses.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The analyses support monophyly of <I>Gagea</I>/<I>Lloydia</I> collectively, and they clearly comprise a single lineage, as some previous authors have hypothesized. The results provide the basis for a new classification of <I>Gagea</I> that has support from some morphological features. Incongruence between plastid and nuclear ITS results is interpreted as potentially due to ancient hybridization and/or paralogy of ITS rDNA.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zarrei, M., Wilkin, P., Fay, M. F., Ingrouille, M. J., Zarre, S., Chase, M. W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-16</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/aob/mcp103</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Molecular systematics of Gagea and Lloydia (Liliaceae; Liliales): implications of analyses of nuclear ribosomal and plastid DNA sequences for infrageneric classification]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>104</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>142</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>125</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>ORIGINAL ARTICLES</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/104/1/143?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Phylogenetics of Olea (Oleaceae) based on plastid and nuclear ribosomal DNA sequences: Tertiary climatic shifts and lineage differentiation times]]></title>
<link>http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/104/1/143?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background and Aims</st>
<p>The genus <I>Olea</I> (Oleaceae) includes approx. 40 taxa of evergreen shrubs and trees classified in three subgenera, <I>Olea</I>, <I>Paniculatae</I> and <I>Tetrapilus</I>, the first of which has two sections (<I>Olea</I> and <I>Ligustroides</I>). Olive trees (the <I>O. europaea</I> complex) have been the subject of intensive research, whereas little is known about the phylogenetic relationships among the other species. To clarify the biogeographical history of this group, a molecular analysis of <I>Olea</I> and related genera of Oleaceae is thus necessary.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A phylogeny was built of <I>Olea</I> and related genera based on sequences of the nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer-1 and four plastid regions. Lineage divergence and the evolution of abaxial peltate scales, the latter character linked to drought adaptation, were dated using a Bayesian method.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Key Results</st>
<p><I>Olea</I> is polyphyletic, with <I>O. ambrensis</I> and subgenus <I>Tetrapilus</I> not sharing a most recent common ancestor with the main <I>Olea</I> clade. Partial incongruence between nuclear and plastid phylogenetic reconstructions suggests a reticulation process in the evolution of subgenus <I>Olea</I>. Estimates of divergence times for major groups of <I>Olea</I> during the Tertiary were obtained.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This study indicates the necessity of revising current taxonomic boundaries in <I>Olea</I>. The results also suggest that main lines of evolution were promoted by major Tertiary climatic shifts: (1) the split between subgenera <I>Olea</I> and <I>Paniculatae</I> appears to have taken place at the Miocene&ndash;Oligocene boundary; (2) the separation of sections <I>Ligustroides</I> and <I>Olea</I> may have occurred during the Early Miocene following the Mi-1 glaciation; and (3) the diversification within these sections (and the origin of dense abaxial indumentum in section <I>Olea</I>) was concomitant with the aridification of Africa in the Late Miocene.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Besnard, G., Rubio de Casas, R., Christin, P.-A., Vargas, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-16</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/aob/mcp105</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Phylogenetics of Olea (Oleaceae) based on plastid and nuclear ribosomal DNA sequences: Tertiary climatic shifts and lineage differentiation times]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>104</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>160</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>143</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>ORIGINAL ARTICLES</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/104/1/161?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Genome size in Hieracium subgenus Hieracium (Asteraceae) is strongly correlated with major phylogenetic groups]]></title>
<link>http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/104/1/161?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background and Aims</st>
<p><I>Hieracium</I> subgenus <I>Hieracium</I> is one of the taxonomically most intricate groups of vascular plants, due to polyploidy and a diversity of breeeding systems (sexuality vs. apomixis). The aim of the present study was to analyse nuclear genome size in a phylogenetic framework and to assess relationships between genome size and ploidy, breeding system and selected ecogeographic features.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Holoploid and monoploid genome sizes (C- and Cx-values) of 215 cultivated plants from 89 field populations of 42 so-called &lsquo;basic&rsquo; <I>Hieracium</I> species were determined using propidium iodide flow cytometry. Chromosome counts were available for all analysed plants, and all plants were tested experimentally for their mode of reproduction (sexuality vs. apomixis). For constructing molecular phylogenetic trees, the external transcribed spacer region of nuclear ribosomal DNA was used.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Key Results</st>
<p>The mean 2C values differed up to 2&middot;37-fold among different species (from 7&middot;03 pg in diploid to 16&middot;67 in tetraploid accessions). The 1Cx values varied 1&middot;22-fold (between 3&middot;51 and 4&middot;34 pg). Variation in 1Cx values between conspecific (species in a broad sense) accessions ranged from 0&middot;24% to 7&middot;2%. Little variation (not exceeding the approximate measurement inaccurracy threshold of 3&middot;5%) was found in 33 species, whereas variation higher than 3&middot;5% was detected in seven species. Most of the latter may have a polytopic origin. Mean 1Cx values of the three cytotypes (2<I>n</I>, 3<I>n</I> and 4<I>n</I>) differed significantly (average of 3&middot;93 pg in diploids, 3&middot;82 pg in triploids and 3&middot;78 pg in tetraploids) indicating downsizing of genomes in polyploids. The pattern of genome size variation correlated well with two major phylogenetic clades which were composed of species with western or eastern European origin. The monoploid genome size in the &lsquo;western&rsquo; species was significantly lower than in the &lsquo;eastern&rsquo; ones. Correlation of genome size with latitude, altitude and selected ecological characters (light and temperature) was not significant. A longitudinal component was only apparent for the whole data set, but absent within the major lineages.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Phylogeny was the most important factor explaining the pattern of genome size variation in <I>Hieracium sensu stricto</I>, species of western European origin having significantly lower genome size in comparison with those of eastern European origin. Any correlation with ecogeographic variables, including longitude, was outweighed by the divergence of the genus into two major phylogenetic lineages.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chrtek, J., Zahradnicek, J., Krak, K., Fehrer, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-16</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/aob/mcp107</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Genome size in Hieracium subgenus Hieracium (Asteraceae) is strongly correlated with major phylogenetic groups]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>104</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>178</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>161</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>ORIGINAL ARTICLES</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/104/1/179?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Water-use responses of 'living fossil' conifers to CO2 enrichment in a simulated Cretaceous polar environment]]></title>
<link>http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/104/1/179?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background and Aims</st>
<p>During the Mesozoic, the polar regions supported coniferous forests that experienced warm climates, a CO<SUB>2</SUB>-rich atmosphere and extreme seasonal variations in daylight. How the interaction between the last two factors might have influenced water use of these conifers was investigated. An experimental approach was used to test the following hypotheses: (1) the expected beneficial effects of elevated [CO<SUB>2</SUB>] on water-use efficiency (WUE) are reduced or lost during the 24-h light of the high-latitude summer; and (2) elevated [CO<SUB>2</SUB>] reduces plant water use over the growing season.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Measurements of leaf and whole-plant gas exchange, and leaf-stable carbon isotope composition were made on one evergreen (<I>Sequoia sempervirens</I>) and two deciduous (<I>Metasequoia glyptostroboides</I> and <I>Taxodium distichum</I>) &lsquo;living fossil&rsquo; coniferous species after 3 years' growth in controlled-environment simulated Cretaceous Arctic (69&deg;N) conditions at either ambient (400 &micro;mol mol<sup>&ndash;1</sup>) or elevated (800 &micro;mol mol<sup>&ndash;1</sup>) [CO<SUB>2</SUB>].</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Key Results</st>
<p>Stimulation of whole-plant WUE (<I>WUE</I><SUB>P</SUB>) by CO<SUB>2</SUB> enrichment was maintained over the growing season for the three studied species but this pattern was not reflected in patterns of WUE inferred from leaf-scale gas exchange measurements (i<I>WUE</I><SUB>L</SUB>) and <sup>13</sup>C of foliage (t<I>WUE</I><SUB>L</SUB>). This response was driven largely by increased rates of carbon uptake, because there was no overall CO<SUB>2</SUB> effect on daily whole-plant transpiration or whole-plant water loss integrated over the study period. Seasonal patterns of t<I>WUE</I><SUB>L</SUB> differed from those measured for i<I>WUE</I><SUB>L</SUB>. The results suggest caution against over simplistic interpretations of <I>WUE</I><SUB>P</SUB> based on leaf isotopic composition.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The data suggest that the efficiency of whole-tree water use may be improved by CO<SUB>2</SUB> enrichment in a simulated high-latitude environment, but that transpiration is relatively insensitive to atmospheric CO<SUB>2</SUB> in the living fossil species investigated.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Llorens, L., Osborne, C. P., Beerling, D. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-16</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/aob/mcp108</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Water-use responses of 'living fossil' conifers to CO2 enrichment in a simulated Cretaceous polar environment]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>104</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>188</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>179</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>ORIGINAL ARTICLES</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/104/1/189?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Uptake of aluminium into Arabidopsis root cells measured by fluorescent lifetime imaging]]></title>
<link>http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/104/1/189?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background and Aims</st>
<p>Measuring the Al<sup>3+</sup> uptake rate across the plasma membrane of intact root cells is crucial for understanding the mechanisms and time-course of Al toxicity in plants. However, a reliable method with the sufficient spatial and temporal resolution to estimate Al<sup>3+</sup> uptake in intact root cells does not exist.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>In the current study, fluorescent lifetime imaging (FLIM) analysis was used to quantify Al<sup>3+</sup> uptake in the root-cell cytoplasm <I>in vivo.</I> This was performed via the estimation of the fluorescence lifetime of Al&ndash;lumogallion {5-chloro-3[(2,4-dihydroxyphenyl)azo]-2-hydroxybenzenesulfonic acid} complexes and measurements of intracellular pH while exposing arabidopsis seedlings to acidic and Al<sup>3+</sup> stresses.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Key Results</st>
<p>The lifetime of Al&ndash;lumogallion complexes fluorescence is pH-dependent. The primary sites for Al<sup>3+</sup> entry are the meristem and distal elongation zones, while Al<sup>3+</sup> uptake via the cortex and epidermis of the mature root zone is limited. The maximum rates of Al uptake into the cytoplasm (2&ndash;3 &micro;mol m<sup>&ndash;3</sup> min<sup>&ndash;1</sup> for the meristematic root zone and 3&ndash;7 &micro;mol m<sup>&ndash;3</sup> min<sup>&ndash;1</sup> for the mature zone) were observed after a 30-min exposure to 100 &micro;<scp>m</scp> AlCl<SUB>3</SUB> (pH 4&middot;2). Intracellular Al concentration increased to 0&middot;4 &micro;<scp>m</scp> Al within the first 3 h of exposure to 100 &micro;<scp>m</scp> AlCl<SUB>3</SUB>.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>FLIM analysis of the fluorescence of Al&ndash;lumogallion complexes can be used to reliably quantify Al uptake in the cytoplasm of intact root cells at the initial stages of Al<sup>3+</sup> stress.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Babourina, O., Rengel, Z.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-16</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/aob/mcp098</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Uptake of aluminium into Arabidopsis root cells measured by fluorescent lifetime imaging]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>104</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>195</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>189</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>SHORT COMMUNICATION</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/9/i?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ContentSnapshots]]></title>
<link>http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/9/i?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/aob/mcp114</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ContentSnapshots]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>9</prism:number>
<prism:volume>103</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>iii</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>i</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>ContentSnapshots</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/9/1355?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Ecology and evolution of plant-pollinator interactions]]></title>
<link>http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/9/1355?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Some of the most exciting advances in pollination biology have resulted from interdisciplinary research combining ecological and evolutionary perspectives. For example, these two approaches have been essential for understanding the functional ecology of floral traits, the dynamics of pollen transport, competition for pollinator services, and patterns of specialization and generalization in plant&ndash;pollinator interactions. However, as research in these and other areas has progressed, many pollination biologists have become more specialized in their research interests, focusing their attention on either evolutionary or ecological questions. We believe that the continuing vigour of a synthetic and interdisciplinary field like pollination biology depends on renewed connections between ecological and evolutionary approaches.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Scope</st>
<p>In this Viewpoint paper we highlight the application of ecological and evolutionary approaches to two themes in pollination biology: (1) links between pollinator behaviour and plant mating systems, and (2) generalization and specialization in pollination systems. We also describe how mathematical models and synthetic analyses have broadened our understanding of pollination biology, especially in human-modified landscapes. We conclude with several suggestions that we hope will stimulate future research. This Viewpoint also serves as the introduction to this Special Issue on the Ecology and Evolution of Plant&ndash;Pollinator Interactions. These papers provide inspiring examples of the synergy between evolutionary and ecological approaches, and offer glimpses of great accomplishments yet to come.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mitchell, R. J., Irwin, R. E., Flanagan, R. J., Karron, J. D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/aob/mcp122</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Ecology and evolution of plant-pollinator interactions]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>9</prism:number>
<prism:volume>103</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1363</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1355</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>VIEWPOINT</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/9/1365?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Trapline foraging by pollinators: its ontogeny, economics and possible consequences for plants]]></title>
<link>http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/9/1365?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Trapline foraging (repeated sequential visits to a series of feeding locations) has been often observed in pollinators collecting nectar or pollen from flowers. Although field studies on bumble-bees and hummingbirds have clarified fundamental aspects of this behaviour, trapline foraging still poses several difficult questions from the perspectives of both animals and plants. These questions include whether and how traplining improves foraging performance, how animals develop traplines with accumulating foraging experience, and how traplining affects pollen flow or plant reproduction.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Scope</st>
<p>First, we review our previous work performed by using computer simulations and indoor flight-cage experiments with bumble-bees foraging from arrays of automated feeders. Our findings include the following: (1) traplining benefits foragers that are competing for resources that replenish in a decelerating way, (2) traplining is a learned behaviour that develops over a period of hours and (3) the establishment of traplines could be hampered by spatial configuration of plants such as zigzags. Second, using a simulation model linking pollinator movement and pollen transfer, we consider how service by pollinators with different foraging patterns (searchers or trapliners) would affect pollen flow. Traplining increases mating distance and mate diversity, and reduces &lsquo;iterogamy&rsquo; (self-pollination caused by return visits) at the population level. Furthermore, increased visitation rates can have opposite effects on the reproductive success of a plant, depending on whether the visitors are traplining or searching. Finally, we discuss possible consequences of traplining for plants in the light of new experimental work and modelling.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>We suggest that trapline foraging by pollinators increases variation among plant populations in genetic diversity, inbreeding depression and contributions of floral traits to plant fitness, which should in turn affect the rates and directions of floral evolution. More theoretical and empirical studies are needed to clarify possible outcomes of such a neglected side of pollination.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ohashi, K., Thomson, J. D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/aob/mcp088</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Trapline foraging by pollinators: its ontogeny, economics and possible consequences for plants]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>9</prism:number>
<prism:volume>103</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1378</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1365</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>LINKING POLLINATOR BEHAVIOUR TO PLANT MATING PATTERNS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/9/1379?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Pollinator visitation patterns strongly influence among-flower variation in selfing rate]]></title>
<link>http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/9/1379?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background and Aims</st>
<p>Adjacent flowers on <I>Mimulus ringens</I> floral displays often vary markedly in selfing rate. We hypothesized that this fine-scale variation in mating system reflects the tendency of bumble-bee pollinators to probe several flowers consecutively on multiflower displays. When a pollinator approaches a display, the first flower probed is likely to receive substantial outcross pollen. However, since pollen carryover in this species is limited, receipt of self pollen should increase rapidly for later flowers. Here the first direct experimental test of this hypothesis is described.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>In order to link floral visitation sequences with selfing rates of individual flowers, replicate linear arrays were established, each composed of plants with unique genetic markers. This facilitated unambiguous assignment of paternity to all sampled progeny. A single wild bumble-bee was permitted to forage on each linear array, recording the order of floral visits on each display. Once fruits had matured, 120 fruits were harvested (four flowers from each of five floral displays in each of six arrays). Twenty-five seedlings from each fruit were genotyped and paternity was unambiguously assigned to all 3000 genotyped progeny.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Key Results</st>
<p>The order of pollinator probes on <I>Mimulus</I> floral displays strongly and significantly influenced selfing rates of individual fruits. Mean selfing rates increased from 21 % for initial probes to 78 % for the fourth flower probed on each display.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Striking among-flower differences in selfing rate result from increased deposition of geitonogamous (among-flower, within-display) self pollen as bumble-bees probe consecutive flowers on each floral display. The resulting heterogeneity in the genetic composition of sibships may influence seedling competition and the expression of inbreeding depression.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Karron, J. D., Holmquist, K. G., Flanagan, R. J., Mitchell, R. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/aob/mcp030</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Pollinator visitation patterns strongly influence among-flower variation in selfing rate]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>9</prism:number>
<prism:volume>103</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1383</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1379</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>LINKING POLLINATOR BEHAVIOUR TO PLANT MATING PATTERNS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/9/1385?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Flowering phenology influences seed production and outcrossing rate in populations of an alpine snowbed shrub, Phyllodoce aleutica: effects of pollinators and self-incompatibility]]></title>
<link>http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/9/1385?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background and Aims</st>
<p>Because of differences in snowmelt time, the reproductive phenologies of alpine plants are highly variable among local populations, and there is large variation in seed set across populations. Temporal variation in pollinator availability during the season may be a major factor affecting not only seed production but also outcrossing rate of alpine plants.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Among local populations of <I>Phyllodoce aleutica</I> that experience different snowmelt regimes, flowering phenology, pollinator availability, seed-set rate, and outcrossing rate were compared with reference to the mating system (self-compatibility or heterospecific compatibility with a co-occurring congeneric species).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Key Results</st>
<p>Flowering occurred sequentially among populations reflecting snowmelt time from mid-July to late August. The visit frequency of bumble-bees increased substantially in late July when workers appeared. Both seed set and outcrossing rate increased as flowering season progressed. Although flowers were self-compatible and heterospecific compatible, the mixed-pollination experiment revealed that fertilization with conspecific, outcrossing pollen took priority over selfing and hybridization, indicating a cryptic self-incompatibility. In early snowmelt populations, seed production was pollen-limited and autogamous selfing was common. However, genetic analyses revealed that selfed progenies did not contribute to the maintenance of populations due to late-acting inbreeding depression.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Large variations in seed-set and outcrossing rates among populations were caused by the timing of pollinator availability during the season and the cryptic self-incompatibility of this species. Despite the intensive pollen limitation in part of the early season, reproductive assurance by autogamous selfing was not evident. Under fluctuating conditions of pollinator availability and flowering structures, <I>P. aleutica</I> maintained the genetic composition by conspecific outcrossing.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kameyama, Y., Kudo, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/aob/mcp037</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Flowering phenology influences seed production and outcrossing rate in populations of an alpine snowbed shrub, Phyllodoce aleutica: effects of pollinators and self-incompatibility]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>9</prism:number>
<prism:volume>103</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1394</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1385</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>LINKING POLLINATOR BEHAVIOUR TO PLANT MATING PATTERNS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/9/1395?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The birds and the bees: pollinator behaviour and variation in the mating system of the rare shrub Grevillea macleayana]]></title>
<link>http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/9/1395?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background and Aims</st>
<p>In Australia, honey-bees have invaded systems that evolved without social insect pollinators, where many plants are adapted to vertebrate pollination. Behavioural differences between pollinators are likely to influence mating patterns, but few studies have examined this empirically in long-lived, woody, perennials. It was shown previously that outcrossing rates in <I>Grevillea macleayana</I> vary among populations. Here tests were conducted to determine whether the behaviour of birds and honey-bees differed between a population previously found to be highly outcrossed and two inbreeding populations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Visit frequencies and movement patterns of the visitors to inflorescences at three sites over two seasons were compared. A caging experiment was used to test the effects of excluding birds on pollen removal from newly opened flowers and on pollen deposition on stigmas that had been washed clean.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Key Results</st>
<p>Honey-bees were the most frequent visitors overall, but honeyeaters were more frequent visitors in the population previously found to have a high outcrossing rate than they were in either of the other populations. More visits by honeyeaters were from distant plants. Pollen removal did not vary greatly among sites, and was not affected by bird exclusion; however, more pollen was deposited on the stigmas of cleaned pollen presenters in the population previously observed to be highly outcrossing than in the other two. This high level of pollen deposition was reduced by experimental bird exclusion.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Honey-bees were the most frequent visitors, by an order of magnitude, and excluding vertebrates revealed that bees were removing most of the pollen but deposited fewer pollen grains on stigmas. Birds were more frequent visitors at the site previously found to be outcrossing than the other two sites, and they moved further between plants and visited fewer inflorescences on a plant during a foraging bout than bees did. These characteristics of bird visits to <I>G. macleayana</I> would be sufficient to produce significant variation in outcrossing rates among sites.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Whelan, R. J., Ayre, D. J., Beynon, F. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/aob/mcp091</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The birds and the bees: pollinator behaviour and variation in the mating system of the rare shrub Grevillea macleayana]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>9</prism:number>
<prism:volume>103</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1401</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1395</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>LINKING POLLINATOR BEHAVIOUR TO PLANT MATING PATTERNS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/9/1403?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[New frontiers in competition for pollination]]></title>
<link>http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/9/1403?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Co-flowering plant species frequently share pollinators. Pollinator sharing is often detrimental to one or more of these species, leading to competition for pollination. Perhaps because it offers an intriguing juxtaposition of ecological opposites &ndash; mutualism and competition &ndash; within one relatively tractable system, competition for pollination has captured the interest of ecologists for over a century.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Scope</st>
<p>Our intent is to contemplate exciting areas for further work on competition for pollination, rather than to exhaustively review past studies. After a brief historical summary, we present a conceptual framework that incorporates many aspects of competition for pollination, involving both the quantity and quality of pollination services, and both female and male sex functions of flowers. Using this framework, we contemplate a relatively subtle mechanism of competition involving pollen loss, and consider how competition might affect plant mating systems, overall reproductive success and multi-species interactions. We next consider how competition for pollination might be altered by several emerging consequences of a changing planet, including the spread of alien species, climate change and pollinator declines. Most of these topics represent new frontiers whose exploration has just begun.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Competition for pollination has served as a model for the integration of ecological and evolutionary perspectives in the study of species interactions. Its study has elucidated both obvious and more subtle mechanisms, and has documented a range of outcomes. However, the potential for this interaction to inform our understanding of both pure and applied aspects of pollination biology has only begun to be realized.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mitchell, R. J., Flanagan, R. J., Brown, B. J., Waser, N. M., Karron, J. D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/aob/mcp062</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[New frontiers in competition for pollination]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>9</prism:number>
<prism:volume>103</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1413</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1403</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>MULTISPECIES INTERACTIONS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/9/1415?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Yeasts in floral nectar: a quantitative survey]]></title>
<link>http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/9/1415?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background and Aims</st>
<p>One peculiarity of floral nectar that remains relatively unexplored from an ecological perspective is its role as a natural habitat for micro-organisms. This study assesses the frequency of occurrence and abundance of yeast cells in floral nectar of insect-pollinated plants from three contrasting plant communities on two continents. Possible correlations between interspecific differences in yeast incidence and pollinator composition are also explored.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>The study was conducted at three widely separated areas, two in the Iberian Peninsula (Spain) and one in the Yucat&aacute;n Peninsula (Mexico). Floral nectar samples from 130 species (37&ndash;63 species per region) in 44 families were examined microscopically for the presence of yeast cells. For one of the Spanish sites, the relationship across species between incidence of yeasts in nectar and the proportion of flowers visited by each of five major pollinator categories was also investigated.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Key Results</st>
<p>Yeasts occurred regularly in the floral nectar of many species, where they sometimes reached extraordinary densities (up to 4 <FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT> 10<sup>5</sup> cells mm<sup>&ndash;3</sup>). Depending on the region, between 32 and 44 % of all nectar samples contained yeasts. Yeast cell densities in the order of 10<sup>4</sup> cells mm<sup>&ndash;3</sup> were commonplace, and densities &gt;10<sup>5</sup> cells mm<sup>&ndash;3</sup> were not rare. About one-fifth of species at each site had mean yeast cell densities &gt;10<sup>4</sup> cells mm<sup>&ndash;3</sup>. Across species, yeast frequency and abundance were directly correlated with the proportion of floral visits by bumble-bees, and inversely with the proportion of visits by solitary bees.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Incorporating nectar yeasts into the scenario of plant&ndash;pollinator interactions opens up a number of intriguing avenues for research. In addition, with yeasts being as ubiquitous and abundant in floral nectars as revealed by this study, and given their astounding metabolic versatility, studies focusing on nectar chemical features should carefully control for the presence of yeasts in nectar samples.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Herrera, C. M., de Vega, C., Canto, A., Pozo, M. I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/aob/mcp026</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Yeasts in floral nectar: a quantitative survey]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>9</prism:number>
<prism:volume>103</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1423</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1415</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>MULTISPECIES INTERACTIONS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/9/1425?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Realized tolerance to nectar robbing: compensation to floral enemies in Ipomopsis aggregata]]></title>
<link>http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/9/1425?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background and Aims</st>
<p>Although the ecological and evolutionary consequences of foliar herbivory are well understood, how plants cope with floral damage is less well explored. Here the concept of tolerance, typically studied within the context of plant defence to foliar herbivores and pathogens, is extended to floral damage. Variation in tolerance to floral damage is examined, together with some of the mechanisms involved.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>The study was conducted on <I>Ipomopsis aggregata</I>, which experiences floral damage and nectar removal by nectar-robbing bees. High levels of robbing can reduce seeds sired and produced by up to 50 %, an indirect effect mediated through pollinator avoidance of robbed plants. Using an experimental common garden with groups of <I>I. aggregata</I>, realized tolerance to robbing was measured. Realized tolerance included both genetic and environmental components of tolerance. It was hypothesized that both resource acquisition and storage traits, and traits involved in pollination would mitigate the negative effects of robbers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Key Results</st>
<p>Groups of <I>I. aggregata</I> varied in their ability to tolerate nectar robbing. Realized tolerance was observed only through a component of male plant reproduction (pollen donation) and not through components of female plant reproduction. Some groups fully compensated for robbing while others under- or overcompensated. Evidence was found only for a pollination-related trait, flower production, associated with realized tolerance. Plants that produced more flowers and that had a higher inducibility of flower production following robbing were more able to compensate through male function.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Variation in realized tolerance to nectar robbing was found in <I>I. aggregata</I>, but only through an estimate of male reproduction, and traits associated with pollination may confer realized tolerance to robbing. By linking concepts and techniques from studies of plant&ndash;pollinator and plant&ndash;herbivore interactions, this work provides insight into the role of floral traits in pollinator attraction as well as plant defence.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Irwin, R. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/aob/mcp056</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Realized tolerance to nectar robbing: compensation to floral enemies in Ipomopsis aggregata]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>9</prism:number>
<prism:volume>103</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1433</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1425</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>MULTISPECIES INTERACTIONS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/9/1435?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reproductive biology of Datura wrightii: the benefits of a herbivorous pollinator]]></title>
<link>http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/9/1435?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background and Aims</st>
<p>A deeper understanding of mutualism can be reached by studying systems with measurable costs and benefits. Most studies of this type focus on an unusual class of obligate, species-specific pollination mutualisms. The interaction between <I>Datura wrightii</I> (Solanaceae) and the hawkmoth <I>Manduca sexta</I> offers similar advantages but greater generality. Adult moths both nectar at and deposit eggs on the same plant; larvae are herbivorous. The antagonistic component of this interaction has been well studied. Here the role of <I>M. sexta</I> as a pollinator of <I>D. wrightii</I>, particularly in the context of this moth's frequent nectaring visits to the bat-pollinated plant <I>Agave palmeri</I>, is documented.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Hand-pollinations were used to determine breeding system and the reproductive consequences of mixed loads of <I>A. palmeri</I> and <I>D. wrightii</I> pollen. Plants and moths were caged overnight to assess whether nectaring visits led to fruit and seed set. Finally, pollen deposited on field-collected stigmas was identified, with a particular focus on documenting the presence of <I>D. wrightii</I> and <I>A. palmeri</I> grains.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Key Results</st>
<p><I>Datura wrightii</I> is highly self-compatible, and a visit that deposits either outcross or self pollen almost doubles fruit and seed set compared with unvisited flowers. <I>Manduca sexta</I> transferred enough pollen to produce fruit and seed sets comparable to hand-pollination treatments. <I>Agave palmeri</I> did not interfere with <I>D. wrightii</I> success: in the field, stigmas received almost pure <I>D. wrightii</I> pollen, and hand-addition of large quantities of <I>A. palmeri</I> pollen had no measurable effect on fruit and seed set.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The floral visitation component of the <I>D. wrightii&ndash;M. sexta</I> interaction is indeed mutualistic. This finding is essential background to future development of this interaction as a model system for studying mutualism's costs and benefits. It is already proving valuable for dissecting third-species effects on the outcome of mutualism. Results indicate that <I>M. sexta</I>'s heavy visitation to <I>A. palmeri</I> has no negative effect on the benefits conferred to <I>D. wrightii</I>. However, it can be predicted to augment <I>M. sexta</I> populations to the point where the costs of the interaction begin to exceed its benefits.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bronstein, J. L., Huxman, T., Horvath, B., Farabee, M., Davidowitz, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/aob/mcp053</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reproductive biology of Datura wrightii: the benefits of a herbivorous pollinator]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>9</prism:number>
<prism:volume>103</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1443</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1435</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>MULTISPECIES INTERACTIONS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/9/1445?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Uniting pattern and process in plant-animal mutualistic networks: a review]]></title>
<link>http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/9/1445?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Ecologists and evolutionary biologists are becoming increasingly interested in networks as a framework to study plant&ndash;animal mutualisms within their ecological context. Although such focus on networks has brought about important insights into the structure of these interactions, relatively little is still known about the mechanisms behind these patterns.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Scope</st>
<p>The aim in this paper is to offer an overview of the mechanisms influencing the structure of plant&ndash;animal mutualistic networks. A brief summary is presented of the salient network patterns, the potential mechanisms are discussed and the studies that have evaluated them are reviewed. This review shows that researchers of plant&ndash;animal mutualisms have made substantial progress in the understanding of the processes behind the patterns observed in mutualistic networks. At the same time, we are still far from a thorough, integrative mechanistic understanding. We close with specific suggestions for directions of future research, which include developing methods to evaluate the relative importance of mechanisms influencing network patterns and focusing research efforts on selected representative study systems throughout the world.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vazquez, D. P., Bluthgen, N., Cagnolo, L., Chacoff, N. P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/aob/mcp057</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Uniting pattern and process in plant-animal mutualistic networks: a review]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>9</prism:number>
<prism:volume>103</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1457</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1445</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>MULTISPECIES INTERACTIONS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/9/1459?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Size-specific interaction patterns and size matching in a plant-pollinator interaction web]]></title>
<link>http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/9/1459?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background and Aims</st>
<p>Many recent studies show that plant&ndash;pollinator interaction webs exhibit consistent structural features such as long-tailed distributions of the degree of generalization, nestedness of interactions and asymmetric interaction dependencies. Recognition of these shared features has led to a variety of mechanistic attempts at explanation. Here it is hypothesized that beside size thresholds and species abundances, the frequency distribution of sizes (nectar depths and proboscis lengths) will play a key role in determining observed interaction patterns.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>To test the influence of size distributions, a new network parameter is introduced: the degree of size matching between nectar depth and proboscis length. The observed degree of size matching in a Spanish plant&ndash;pollinator web was compared with the expected degree based on joint probability distributions, integrating size thresholds and abundance, and taking the sampling method into account.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Key Results</st>
<p>Nectar depths and proboscis lengths both exhibited right-skewed frequency distributions across species and individuals. Species-based size matching was equally close for plants, independent of nectar depth, but differed significantly for pollinators of dissimilar proboscis length. The observed patterns were predicted well by a model considering size distributions across species. Observed size matching was closer when relative abundances of species were included, especially for flowers with openly accessible nectar and pollinators with long proboscises, but was predicted somewhat less successfully by the model that included abundances.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The results suggest that in addition to size thresholds and species abundances, size distributions are important for understanding interaction patterns in plant&ndash;pollinator webs. It is likely that the understanding will be improved further by characterizing for entire communities how nectar production of flowers and energetic requirements of pollinators covary with size, and how sampling methods influence the observed interaction patterns.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stang, M., Klinkhamer, P. G. L., Waser, N. M., Stang, I., van der Meijden, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/aob/mcp027</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Size-specific interaction patterns and size matching in a plant-pollinator interaction web]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>9</prism:number>
<prism:volume>103</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1469</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1459</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>MULTISPECIES INTERACTIONS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/9/1471?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A global test of the pollination syndrome hypothesis]]></title>
<link>http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/9/1471?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background and Aims</st>
<p>&lsquo;Pollination syndromes&rsquo; are suites of phenotypic traits hypothesized to reflect convergent adaptations of flowers for pollination by specific types of animals. They were first developed in the 1870s and honed during the mid 20th Century. In spite of this long history and their central role in organizing research on plant&ndash;pollinator interactions, the pollination syndromes have rarely been subjected to test. The syndromes were tested here by asking whether they successfully capture patterns of covariance of floral traits and predict the most common pollinators of flowers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Flowers in six communities from three continents were scored for expression of floral traits used in published descriptions of the pollination syndromes, and simultaneously the pollinators of as many species as possible were characterized.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Key Results</st>
<p>Ordination of flowers in a multivariate &lsquo;phenotype space&rsquo; defined by the syndromes showed that almost no plant species fall within the discrete syndrome clusters. Furthermore, in approximately two-thirds of plant species, the most common pollinator could not be successfully predicted by assuming that each plant species belongs to the syndrome closest to it in phenotype space.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The pollination syndrome hypothesis as usually articulated does not successfully describe the diversity of floral phenotypes or predict the pollinators of most plant species. Caution is suggested when using pollination syndromes for organizing floral diversity, or for inferring agents of floral adaptation. A fresh look at how traits of flowers and pollinators relate to visitation and pollen transfer is recommended, in order to determine whether axes can be identified that describe floral functional diversity more successfully than the traditional syndromes.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ollerton, J., Alarcon, R., Waser, N. M., Price, M. V., Watts, S., Cranmer, L., Hingston, A., Peter, C. I., Rotenberry, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/aob/mcp031</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A global test of the pollination syndrome hypothesis]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>9</prism:number>
<prism:volume>103</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1480</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1471</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>SPECIALIZATION AND GENERALIZATION IN PLANT-POLLINATOR INTERACTIONS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/9/1481?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A generalized pollination system in the tropics: bats, birds and Aphelandra acanthus]]></title>
<link>http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/9/1481?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background and Aims</st>
<p>A number of different types of flower-visiting animals coexist in any given habitat. What evolutionary and ecological factors influence the subset of these that a given plant relies on for its pollination? Addressing this question requires a mechanistic understanding of the importance of different potential pollinators in terms of visitation rate (pollinator &lsquo;quantity&rsquo;) and effectiveness at transferring pollen (pollinator &lsquo;quality&rsquo;) is required. While bat-pollinated plants typically are highly specialized to bats, there are some instances of bat-pollinated plants that use other pollinators as well. These generalized exceptions tend to occur in habitats where bat &lsquo;quantity&rsquo; is poor due to low or fluctuating bat densities.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p><I>Aphelandra acanthus</I> occurs in tropical cloud forests with relatively high densities of bat visitors, yet displays a mix of floral syndrome characteristics, suggesting adaptation to multiple types of pollinators. To understand its pollination system better, aspects of its floral phenology and the &lsquo;quantity&rsquo; and &lsquo;quality&rsquo; components of pollination by its floral visitors are studied here.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Key Results</st>
<p>Flowers were found to open and senesce throughout the day and night, although anther dehiscence was restricted to the late afternoon and night. Videotaping reveals that flowers are visited nocturnally by bats and moths, and diurnally by hummingbirds. Analysis of pollen deposition shows that bats regularly transfer large amounts of conspecific pollen, while hummingbirds occasionally transfer some pollen, and moths rarely do so.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Hummingbirds and bats were comparable in terms of pollination &lsquo;quantity&rsquo;, while bats were the most effective in terms of &lsquo;quality&rsquo;. Considering these components together, bats are responsible for approx. 70 % of <I>A. acanthus</I> pollination. However, bats also transferred remarkably large amounts of foreign pollen along with the conspecific grains (three of four grains were foreign). It is suggested that the negative effects of interspecific pollen transfer may decrease bat &lsquo;quality&rsquo; for <I>A. acanthus</I>, and thus select for generalization on multiple pollinators instead of specialization on bats.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Muchhala, N., Caiza, A., Vizuete, J. C., Thomson, J. D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/aob/mcn260</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A generalized pollination system in the tropics: bats, birds and Aphelandra acanthus]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>9</prism:number>
<prism:volume>103</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1487</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1481</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>SPECIALIZATION AND GENERALIZATION IN PLANT-POLLINATOR INTERACTIONS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/9/1489?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Extreme variation in floral characters and its consequences for pollinator attraction among populations of an Andean cactus]]></title>
<link>http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/9/1489?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background and aims</st>
<p>A South American cactus species, <I>Echinopsis ancistrophora</I> (Cactaceae), with dramatic among-population variation in floral traits is presented.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Eleven populations of <I>E. ancistrophora</I> were studied in their habitats in northern Argentina, and comparisons were made of relevant floral traits such as depth, stigma position, nectar volume and sugar concentration, and anthesis time. Diurnal and nocturnal pollinator assemblages were evaluated for populations with different floral trait combinations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Key Results</st>
<p>Remarkable geographical variations in floral traits were recorded among the 11 populations throughout the distribution range of <I>E. ancistrophora</I>, with flower lengths ranging from 4&middot;5 to 24&middot;1 cm. Other floral traits associated with pollinator attraction also varied in a population-specific manner, in concert with floral depth. Populations with the shortest flowers showed morning anthesis and those with the longest flowers opened at dusk, whereas those with flowers of intermediate length opened at unusual times (2300&ndash;0600 h). Nectar production varied non-linearly with floral length; it was absent to low (population means up to 15 &micro;L) in short- to intermediate-length flowers, but was high (population means up to 170 &micro;L) in the longest tubed flowers. Evidence from light-trapping of moths, pollen carriage on their bodies and moth scale deposition on stigmas suggests that sphingid pollination is prevalent only in the four populations with the longest flowers, in which floral morphological traits and nectar volumes match the classic expectations for the hawkmoth pollination syndrome. All other populations, with flowers 4&middot;5&ndash;15 cm long, were pollinated exclusively by solitary bees.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The results suggest incipient differentiation at the population level and local adaptation to either bee or hawkmoth (potentially plus bee) pollination.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Schlumpberger, B. O., Cocucci, A. A., More, M., Sersic, A. N., Raguso, R. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/aob/mcp075</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Extreme variation in floral characters and its consequences for pollinator attraction among populations of an Andean cactus]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>9</prism:number>
<prism:volume>103</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1500</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1489</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>SPECIALIZATION AND GENERALIZATION IN PLANT-POLLINATOR INTERACTIONS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/9/1501?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Fly pollination in Ceropegia (Apocynaceae: Asclepiadoideae): biogeographic and phylogenetic perspectives]]></title>
<link>http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/9/1501?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background and Aims</st>
<p><I>Ceropegia</I> (Apocynaceae subfamily Asclepiadoideae) is a large, Old World genus of &gt;180 species, all of which possess distinctive flask-shaped flowers that temporarily trap pollinators. The taxonomic diversity of pollinators, biogeographic and phylogenetic patterns of pollinator exploitation, and the level of specificity of interactions were assessed in order to begin to understand the role of pollinators in promoting diversification within the genus.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Flower visitor and pollinator data for approx. 60 <I>Ceropegia</I> taxa were analysed with reference to the main centres of diversity of the genus and to a cpDNA&ndash;nrDNA molecular phylogeny of the genus.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Key Results</st>
<p><I>Ceropegia</I> spp. interact with flower-visiting Diptera from at least 26 genera in 20 families, of which 11 genera and 11 families are pollinators. Size range of flies was 0&middot;5&ndash;4&middot;0 mm and approx. 94 % were females. <I>Ceropegia</I> from particular regions do not use specific fly genera or families, though Arabian Peninsula species are pollinated by a wider range of Diptera families than those in other regions. The basal-most clade interacts with the highest diversity of Diptera families and genera, largely due to one hyper-generalist taxon, <I>C. aristolochioides</I> subsp. <I>deflersiana</I>. Species in the more-derived clades interact with a smaller diversity of Diptera. Approximately 60 % of taxa are so far recorded as interacting with only a single genus of pollinators, the remaining 40 % being less conservative in their interactions. <I>Ceropegia</I> spp. can therefore be ecological specialists or generalists.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The genus <I>Ceropegia</I> has largely radiated without evolutionary shifts in pollinator functional specialization, maintaining its interactions with small Diptera. Intriguing biogeographic and phylogenetic patterns may reflect processes of regional dispersal, diversification and subsequent specialization onto a narrower range of pollinators, though some of the findings may be caused by inconsistent sampling. Comparisons are made with other plant genera in the Aristolochiaceae and Araceae that have evolved flask-shaped flowers that trap female flies seeking oviposition sites.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ollerton, J., Masinde, S., Meve, U., Picker, M., Whittington, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/aob/mcp072</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Fly pollination in Ceropegia (Apocynaceae: Asclepiadoideae): biogeographic and phylogenetic perspectives]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>9</prism:number>
<prism:volume>103</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1514</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1501</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>SPECIALIZATION AND GENERALIZATION IN PLANT-POLLINATOR INTERACTIONS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/9/1515?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Wind of change: new insights on the ecology and evolution of pollination and mating in wind-pollinated plants]]></title>
<link>http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/9/1515?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>The rich literature that characterizes the field of pollination biology has focused largely on animal-pollinated plants. At least 10 % of angiosperms are wind pollinated, and this mode of pollination has evolved on multiple occasions among unrelated lineages, and hence this discrepancy in research interest is surprising. Here, the evolution and functional ecology of pollination and mating in wind-pollinated plants are discussed, a theoretical framework for modelling the selection of wind pollination is outlined, and pollen capture and the occurrence of pollen limitation in diverse wind-pollinated herbs are investigated experimentally.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Scope and Conclusions</st>
<p>Wind pollination may commonly evolve to provide reproductive assurance when pollinators are scarce. Evidence is presented that pollen limitation in wind-pollinated plants may not be as common as it is in animal-pollinated species. The studies of pollen capture in wind-pollinated herbs demonstrate that pollen transfer efficiency is not substantially lower than in animal-pollinated plants as is often assumed. These findings challenge the explanation that the evolution of few ovules in wind-pollinated flowers is associated with low pollen loads. Floral and inflorescence architecture is crucial to pollination and mating because of the aerodynamics of wind pollination. Evidence is provided for the importance of plant height, floral position, and stamen and stigma characteristics in promoting effective pollen dispersal and capture. Finally, it is proposed that geitonogamous selfing may alleviate pollen limitation in many wind-pollinated plants with unisexual flowers.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Friedman, J., Barrett, S. C. H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/aob/mcp035</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Wind of change: new insights on the ecology and evolution of pollination and mating in wind-pollinated plants]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>9</prism:number>
<prism:volume>103</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1527</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1515</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>SPECIALIZATION AND GENERALIZATION IN PLANT-POLLINATOR INTERACTIONS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/9/1529?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The adaptive accuracy of flowers: measurement and microevolutionary patterns]]></title>
<link>http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/9/1529?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background and Aims</st>
<p>From Darwin's time onward, biologists have thought about adaptation as evolution toward optimal trait values, but they have not usually assessed the relative importance of the distinct causes of deviations from optima. This problem is investigated here by measuring adaptive inaccuracy (phenotypic deviation from the optimum), using flower pollination as an adaptive system.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Adaptive accuracy is shown to have at least three distinct components, two of which are optimality (deviation of the mean from the optimum) and precision (trait variance). We then describe adaptive accuracy of both individuals and populations. Individual inaccuracy comprises the deviation of the genotypic target (the mean phenotype of a genotype grown in a range of environments) from the optimum and the phenotypic variation around that genotypic target (phenotypic imprecision). Population inaccuracy has three basic components: deviation of the population mean from the optimum, variance in the genotypic targets and phenotypic imprecision. In addition, a fourth component is proposed, namely within-population variation in the optimum. These components are directly estimable, have additive relationships, and allow exploration of the causes of adaptive inaccuracy of both individuals and populations. Adaptive accuracy of a sample of flowers is estimated, relating floral phenotypes controlling pollen deposition on pollinators to adaptive optima defined as the site most likely to get pollen onto stigmas (male inaccuracy). Female inaccuracy is defined as the deviation of the position of stigma contact from the expected location of pollen on pollinators.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Key Results</st>
<p>A surprising amount of variation in estimated accuracy within and among similar species is found. Some of this variation is generated by developmental changes in positions of stigmas or anthers during anthesis (the floral receptive period), which can cause dramatic change in accuracy estimates. There seem to be trends for higher precision and accuracy in flowers with higher levels of integration and dichogamy (temporal separation of sexual functions), and in those that have pollinators that are immobile (or immobilized) during pollen transfer. Large deviations from putative adaptive optima were observed, and these may be related to the effects of conflicting selective pressures on flowers, such as selection against self-pollination promoting herkogamy (spatial separation of pollen and stigmas).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Adaptive accuracy is a useful concept for understanding the adaptive significance of phenotypic means and variances of floral morphology within and among populations and species. Estimating and comparing the various components of adaptive accuracy can be particularly helpful for identifying the causes of inaccuracy, such as conflicting selective pressures, low environmental canalization and developmental instability.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Armbruster, W. S., Hansen, T. F., Pelabon, C., Perez-Barrales, R., Maad, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/aob/mcp095</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The adaptive accuracy of flowers: measurement and microevolutionary patterns]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>9</prism:number>
<prism:volume>103</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1545</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1529</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>FUNCTIONAL ECOLOGY OF FLORAL TRAITS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/9/1547?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Tests of adaptation: functional studies of pollen removal and estimates of natural selection on anther position in wild radish]]></title>
<link>http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/9/1547?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>There are a number of difficulties associated with the study of adaptation. One is a lack of variation in the trait, which is common in adaptations because past selection has removed unfit variants. This lack of variation makes it difficult to determine the relationship between trait variation and fitness. Another difficulty is proving causation in this trait&ndash;fitness relationship, because a correlated trait might be the actual adaptation. These difficulties can be ameliorated at least partially by combining studies of natural variation with studies of experimentally manipulated traits and traits whose variance has been augmented by artificial selection.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Scope</st>
<p>We review here a number of our studies on the adaptive value of two aspects of anther position in wild radish (<I>Raphanus raphanistrum</I>, Brassicaceae): anther exsertion, i.e. the degree to which anthers protrude from the mouth of the corolla tube, and anther height dimorphism, i.e. the difference in lengths of the filaments between the two short and four long stamens. We have used both functional analyses, in which the response variable is pollen removal, and measurements of selection, in which the response variable is lifetime male fitness estimated by molecular genetic paternity analyses. In these studies we use both the natural variation in populations as well as manipulated variation, the latter through both stamen removal and artificial selection, to re-create the ancestral trait conditions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Our work provides convincing evidence that intermediate anther exsertion values are adaptive, and that this is probably an adaptation to a subset of the pollinator fauna, small bees. The picture for anther height dimorphism is much less clear, as the weight of current evidence suggests that current values of this trait might actually be maladaptive; however, if this is true it is difficult to understand how the dimorphism is maintained across the family Brassicaceae.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Conner, J. K., Sahli, H. F., Karoly, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/aob/mcp071</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Tests of adaptation: functional studies of pollen removal and estimates of natural selection on anther position in wild radish]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>9</prism:number>
<prism:volume>103</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1556</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1547</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>FUNCTIONAL ECOLOGY OF FLORAL TRAITS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/9/1557?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Using phenotypic manipulations to study multivariate selection of floral trait associations]]></title>
<link>http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/9/1557?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>A basic theme in the study of plant&ndash;pollinator interactions is that pollinators select not just for single floral traits, but for associations of traits. Responses of pollinators to sets of traits are inherent in the idea of pollinator syndromes. In its most extreme form, selection on a suite of traits can take the form of correlational selection, in which a response to one trait depends on the value of another, thereby favouring floral integration. Despite the importance of selection for combinations of traits in the evolution of flowers, evidence is relatively sparse and relies mostly on observational approaches.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Scope</st>
<p>Here, methods for measuring selection on multivariate suites of floral traits are presented, and the studies to date are reviewed. It is argued that phenotypic manipulations present a powerful, but rarely used, approach to teasing apart the separate and combined effects of particular traits. The approach is illustrated with data from studies of alpine plants in Colorado and New Zealand, and recommendations are made about several features of the design of such experiments.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Phenotypic manipulations of two or more traits in combination provide a direct way of testing for selection of floral trait associations. Such experiments will be particularly valuable if rooted in hypotheses about differences between types of pollinators and tied to a proposed evolutionary history.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Campbell, D. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/aob/mcp032</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Using phenotypic manipulations to study multivariate selection of floral trait associations]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>9</prism:number>
<prism:volume>103</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1566</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1557</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>FUNCTIONAL ECOLOGY OF FLORAL TRAITS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/9/1567?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Pollinators of the Rocky Mountain columbine: temporal variation, functional groups and associations with floral traits]]></title>
<link>http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/9/1567?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background and Aims</st>
<p>Pollinators together with other biotic and some abiotic factors can select for floral traits. However, variation in pollinator abundance over time and space can weaken such selection. In the present study, the variation in pollinator abundance over time and space was examined in populations of the Rocky Mountain columbine. The variation in three floral traits is described and correlations between pollinator type, functional pollinator groups or altitude and floral traits are examined.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Pollinator observations took place in six <I>Aquilegia coerulea</I> populations over 1&ndash;4 years and spur length, flower colour and sepal length were measured in 12 populations. Pollinator abundance, measured as visits per flower per hour, was compared among populations and years. Pollinators were grouped into two functional groups: pollen or nectar collectors. The following associations were examined: annual presence of hawkmoths and whiter flowers with longer spurs; the presence of <I>Sphinx vashti</I> and longer spurs; and higher altitudes and whiter flowers. The study looked at whether an increase in the proportion of hawkmoths in a population was associated with whiter and larger flowers with longer spurs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Key Results</st>
<p>The abundance of different pollinator groups varied over time and space. Floral traits varied among populations. Higher altitude was correlated with bluer flowers. Whiter flowers were associated with the annual presence of hawkmoths. Populations visited by <I>Sphinx vashti</I> had longer spurs than populations visited only by <I>Hyles lineata</I>. Populations with greater percentage of nectar-collecting pollinators did not have whiter, larger flowers with longer spurs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Despite the large variation in pollinator abundance over time and space, one species of bumble-bee or hawkmoth tended to predominate in each population each year. Future studies of <I>Aquilegia coerulea</I> should examine the specific influences of pollinators and the environment on flower colour and of hawkmoth species on spur length.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brunet, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/aob/mcp096</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Pollinators of the Rocky Mountain columbine: temporal variation, functional groups and associations with floral traits]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>9</prism:number>
<prism:volume>103</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1578</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1567</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>FUNCTIONAL ECOLOGY OF FLORAL TRAITS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/9/1579?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[How much does agriculture depend on pollinators? Lessons from long-term trends in crop production]]></title>
<link>http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/9/1579?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background and Aims</st>
<p>Productivity of many crops benefits from the presence of pollinating insects, so a decline in pollinator abundance should compromise global agricultural production. Motivated by the lack of accurate estimates of the size of this threat, we quantified the effect of total loss of pollinators on global agricultural production and crop production diversity. The change in pollinator dependency over 46 years was also evaluated, considering the developed and developing world separately.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Using the extensive FAO dataset, yearly data were compiled for 1961&ndash;2006 on production and cultivated area of 87 important crops, which we classified into five categories of pollinator dependency. Based on measures of the aggregate effect of differential pollinator dependence, the consequences of a complete loss of pollinators in terms of reductions in total agricultural production and diversity were calculated. An estimate was also made of the increase in total cultivated area that would be required to compensate for the decrease in production of every single crop in the absence of pollinators.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Key Results</st>
<p>The expected direct reduction in total agricultural production in the absence of animal pollination ranged from 3 to 8 %, with smaller impacts on agricultural production diversity. The percentage increase in cultivated area needed to compensate for these deficits was several times higher, particularly in the developing world, which comprises two-thirds of the land devoted to crop cultivation globally. Crops with lower yield growth tended to have undergone greater expansion in cultivated area. Agriculture has become more pollinator-dependent over time, and this trend is more pronounced in the developing than developed world.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>We propose that pollination shortage will intensify demand for agricultural land, a trend that will be more pronounced in the developing world. This increasing pressure on supply of agricultural land could significantly contribute to global environmental change.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aizen, M. A., Garibaldi, L. A., Cunningham, S. A., Klein, A. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/aob/mcp076</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[How much does agriculture depend on pollinators? Lessons from long-term trends in crop production]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>9</prism:number>
<prism:volume>103</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1588</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1579</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>POLLINATION BIOLOGY IN HUMAN-MODIFIED SYSTEMS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/9/1589?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Modelling pollination services across agricultural landscapes]]></title>
<link>http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/9/1589?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background and Aims</st>
<p>Crop pollination by bees and other animals is an essential ecosystem service. Ensuring the maintenance of the service requires a full understanding of the contributions of landscape elements to pollinator populations and crop pollination. Here, the first quantitative model that predicts pollinator abundance on a landscape is described and tested.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Using information on pollinator nesting resources, floral resources and foraging distances, the model predicts the relative abundance of pollinators within nesting habitats. From these nesting areas, it then predicts relative abundances of pollinators on the farms requiring pollination services. Model outputs are compared with data from coffee in Costa Rica, watermelon and sunflower in California and watermelon in New Jersey&ndash;Pennsylvania (NJPA).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Key Results</st>
<p>Results from Costa Rica and California, comparing field estimates of pollinator abundance, richness or services with model estimates, are encouraging, explaining up to 80 % of variance among farms. However, the model did not predict observed pollinator abundances on NJPA, so continued model improvement and testing are necessary. The inability of the model to predict pollinator abundances in the NJPA landscape may be due to not accounting for fine-scale floral and nesting resources within the landscapes surrounding farms, rather than the logic of our model.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The importance of fine-scale resources for pollinator service delivery was supported by sensitivity analyses indicating that the model's predictions depend largely on estimates of nesting and floral resources within crops. Despite the need for more research at the finer-scale, the approach fills an important gap by providing quantitative and mechanistic model from which to evaluate policy decisions and develop land-use plans that promote pollination conservation and service delivery.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lonsdorf, E., Kremen, C., Ricketts, T., Winfree, R., Williams, N., Greenleaf, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/aob/mcp069</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Modelling pollination services across agricultural landscapes]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>9</prism:number>
<prism:volume>103</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1600</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1589</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>POLLINATION BIOLOGY IN HUMAN-MODIFIED SYSTEMS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/8/i?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ContentSnapshots]]></title>
<link>http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/8/i?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-21</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/aob/mcp115</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ContentSnapshots]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>103</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>iii</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>i</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>ContentSnapshots</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/8/v?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[John Bryant takes a closer look at some of this month's Original Articles]]></title>
<link>http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/8/v?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bryant, J. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-21</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/aob/mcp125</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[John Bryant takes a closer look at some of this month's Original Articles]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>103</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>vi</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>v</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>ContentSelect</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/8/vii?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Root hairs. Plant Cell Monographs, vol. 12]]></title>
<link>http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/8/vii?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chaffey, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-21</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/aob/mcp083</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Root hairs. Plant Cell Monographs, vol. 12]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>103</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>vii</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>vii</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>BOOK REVIEWS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/8/viii?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The plant cytoskeleton: a key tool for agro-biotechnology]]></title>
<link>http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/8/viii?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chaffey, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-21</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/aob/mcp084</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The plant cytoskeleton: a key tool for agro-biotechnology]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>103</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>vi